The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The economics of risk, uncertainty and learning in the adoption of new agricultural technologies: where are we on the learning curve?
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Dixit, R. K., & Pindyck, R. S. (1994) · doi:10.1515/9781400830176 · Cited by 9,029
Adoption of Agricultural Innovations in Developing Countries: A Survey
Feder, G., Just, R. E., & Zilberman, D. (1985) · Economic Development and Cultural Change · doi:10.1086/451461 · Cited by 3,482
Learning by doing and learning from others: Human capital and technical change in agriculture
Foster, A. D., & Rosenzweig, M. R. (1995) · Journal of Political Economy · doi:10.1086/601447 · Cited by 2,038
Cited by
Positive but variable effects of crop diversification on biodiversity and ecosystem services
Beillouin, D., Ben‐Ari, T., Malézieux, E., Seufert, V., & Makowski, D. (2021) · Global Change Biology · doi:10.1111/gcb.15747 · Cited by 590
Predicting farmer uptake of new agricultural practices: a tool for research, extension and policy
Kuehne, G., Llewellyn, R., Pannell, D. J., Wilkinson, R., Dolling, P., Ouzman, J., & Ewing, M. (2017) · Agricultural Systems · doi:10.1016/j.agsy.2017.06.007 · Cited by 367
Self-citationImpact of Bt cotton on pesticide poisoning in smallholder agriculture: A panel data analysis
Kouser, S., & Qaim, M. (2011) · Ecological Economics · doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2011.06.008 · Cited by 192
Jacobs, A. A., Evans, R. S., Allison, J. K., Garner, E. R., Kingery, W. L., & McCulley, R. L. (2022) · Soil and Tillage Research · doi:10.1016/j.still.2021.105310 · Cited by 99
The adopters versus the technology: which matters more when predicting or explaining adoption?
de Oca Munguia, O. M., & Llewellyn, R. (2020) · Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy · doi:10.1002/aepp.13007 · Cited by 90
Information quality and effectiveness for more rapid adoption decisions by farmers
Llewellyn, R. S. (2007) · Field Crops Research · doi:10.1016/j.fcr.2007.03.022 · Cited by 79
The sustainable start‐up paradox: Predicting the business and climate performance of start‐ups
Leendertse, J., van Rijnsoever, F. J., & Eveleens, C. P. (2021) · Business Strategy and the Environment · doi:10.1002/bse.2667 · Cited by 64
Mola-Yudego, B., & Pelkonen, P. (2008) · Energy Policy · doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2008.03.036 · Cited by 59
Canales, E., Bergtold, J. S., & Williams, J. R. (2024) · American Journal of Agricultural Economics · doi:10.1111/ajae.12414 · Cited by 38
Devilliers, E., Koutchadé, O. P., & Carpentier, A. (2025) · European Review of Agricultural Economics · doi:10.1093/erae/jbaf025 · Cited by 1
Metadata
- Authors
- Marra, M., Pannell, D. J., & Abadi Ghadim, A.
- Venue
- Agricultural Systems
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2003-02
- Volume
- 75
- Issue
- 2-3
- Pages
- 215-234
- ISSN
- 0308-521X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2020068677
- Cited by
- 589
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 57.51
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
