The DOI matches its Crossref record; 25 of the 25 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Focusing on form: student engagement with teacher feedback?
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“F. Hyland (2003), for example, found that the extent her two case study students engaged with form-focused feedback varied greatly, so that one lower-intermediate student's response to teacher feedback was strongly influenced by her emotional reactions to the teachers' comments on her work.”
From Student engagement with teacher and automated feedback on L2 writing (2018) · cites this paper as F. Hyland (2003)
Citations
Cites
A Cognitive Approach to Language Learning
Garcia, P., & Skehan, P. (1999) · TESOL Quarterly · doi:10.2307/3587891 · Cited by 3,489
The Case Against Grammar Correction in L2 Writing Classes
Truscott, J. (1996) · Language Learning · doi:10.1111/j.1467-1770.1996.tb01238.x · Cited by 1,874
Error feedback in L2 writing classes
Ferris, D., & Roberts, B. (2001) · Journal of Second Language Writing · doi:10.1016/s1060-3743(01)00039-x · Cited by 981
The case for grammar correction in L2 writing classes: A response to truscott (1996)
Ferris, D. R. (1999) · Journal of Second Language Writing · doi:10.1016/s1060-3743(99)80110-6 · Cited by 856
Zamel, V. (1985) · TESOL Quarterly · doi:10.2307/3586773 · Cited by 763
(2002) · Cited by 661
Reducing Composition Errors: An Experiment
Lalande, J. F. (1982) · Modern Language Journal · doi:10.1111/j.1540-4781.1982.tb06973.x · Cited by 642
Student Reactions to Teacher Response in Multiple‐Draft Composition Classrooms*
Ferris, D. (1995) · TESOL Quarterly · doi:10.2307/3587804 · Cited by 630
Kepner, C. G. (1991) · Modern Language Journal · doi:10.1111/j.1540-4781.1991.tb05359.x · Cited by 627
The influence of teacher commentary on student revision
Ferris, D. R. (1997) · TESOL Quarterly · doi:10.2307/3588049 · Cited by 618
Salience of Feedback on Error and Its Effect on EFL Writing Quality
Robb, T., Ross, S. J., & Shortreed, I. (1986) · TESOL Quarterly · doi:10.2307/3586390 · Cited by 568
The case for “The Case Against Grammar Correction in L2 Writing Classes”: A response to Ferris
Truscott, J. (1999) · Journal of Second Language Writing · doi:10.1016/s1060-3743(99)80124-6 · Cited by 541
The preferences of ESL students for error correction in college-level writing classes
Leki, I. (1991) · Foreign Language Annals · doi:10.1111/j.1944-9720.1991.tb00464.x · Cited by 516
The impact of teacher written feedback on individual writers
Hyland, F. (1998) · Journal of Second Language Writing · doi:10.1016/s1060-3743(98)90017-0 · Cited by 456
Self-citationSemke, H. D. (1984) · Foreign Language Annals · doi:10.1111/j.1944-9720.1984.tb01727.x · Cited by 402
Feedback on feedback: Assessing learner receptivity to teacher response in L2 composing
Hedgcock, J., & Lefkowitz, N. (1994) · Journal of Second Language Writing · doi:10.1016/1060-3743(94)90012-4 · Cited by 308
ESL writers and feedback: giving more autonomy to students
Hyland, F. (2000) · Language Teaching Research · doi:10.1177/136216880000400103 · Cited by 296
Self-citationAcademic writing in a second language: Essays on research and pedagogy
Samraj, B. (1996) · English for Specific Purposes · doi:10.1016/0889-4906(96)81112-4 · Cited by 287
“If I only had more time:” ESL learners' changes in linguistic accuracy on essay revisions
Polio, C. G., Fleck, C., & Leder, N. (1998) · Journal of Second Language Writing · doi:10.1016/s1060-3743(98)90005-4 · Cited by 277
Raimes, A. (1987) · Language Learning · doi:10.1111/j.1467-1770.1987.tb00579.x · Cited by 266
ESL student reaction to written comments on their written work
Radecki, P. M., & Swales, J. M. (1988) · System · doi:10.1016/0346-251x(88)90078-4 · Cited by 233
Teacher commentary on student writing: Descriptions & implications
Ferris, D. R., Pezone, S., Tade, C. R., & Tinti, S. (1997) · Journal of Second Language Writing · doi:10.1016/s1060-3743(97)90032-1 · Cited by 207
Some Input on Input: Two Analyses of Student Response to Expert Feedback in L2 Writing
Hedgcock, J. S., & Lefkowitz, N. (1996) · Modern Language Journal · doi:10.1111/j.1540-4781.1996.tb01612.x · Cited by 151
TREATMENT OF ERROR IN SECOND LANGUAGE STUDENT WRITING. UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN PRESS
Ferris, D. R. (2002) · Cited by 18
Error Correction in Foreign Language Teaching
Cui, Y. (2001) · Cited by 17
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Student engagement literature review
Trowler, V. (2010) · Cited by 1,078
Feedback on second language students' writing
Hyland, K., & Hyland, F. (2006) · Language Teaching · doi:10.1017/s0261444806003399 · Cited by 1,048
Self-citationStudent engagement with teacher and automated feedback on L2 writing
Zhang, Z. (., & Hyland, K. (2018) · Assessing Writing · doi:10.1016/j.asw.2018.02.004 · Cited by 546
Exploring learner engagement with written corrective feedback in a Chinese tertiary EFL classroom
Han, Y., & Hyland, F. (2015) · Journal of Second Language Writing · doi:10.1016/j.jslw.2015.08.002 · Cited by 530
Self-citationFacilitating productive use of feedback in higher education
Jonsson, A. (2013) · Active Learning in Higher Education · doi:10.1177/1469787412467125 · Cited by 414
Metadata
- Authors
- Hyland, F.
- Affiliations
- University of Hong Kong (HK)
- Corresponding author
- Hyland, Fiona
- Venue
- System
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2003-06
- Volume
- 31
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 217-230
- ISSN
- 0346-251X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1965566286
- Cited by
- 411
- References
- 25
- Citations by year
- 2026: 10 · 2025: 18 · 2024: 28 · 2023: 22 · 2022: 32 · 2021: 36 · 2020: 27 · 2019: 47 · 2018: 20 · 2017: 18 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 22 · 2014: 21 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 17
- FWCI
- 37.98
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- System (publishedVersion)
- The HKU Scholars Hub (University of Hong Kong) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning
- Social Sciences › Education › Student Assessment and Feedback
- Social Sciences › Linguistics and Language › Discourse Analysis in Language Studies
- Keywords
- teacher feedback, student revision, academic writing, linguistic accuracy, student engagement, writing instruction
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
