What factors facilitate teacher skill, teacher morale, and perceived student learning in technology-using classrooms?
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
For more than 20 years, the value of technology forced education stakeholders to change their way of designing their programs.
“Baylor and Ritchie (2002) claim that for more than 20 years, the value of technology forced education stakeholders to change their way of designing their programs.”
From Applications Used in Distance Education in English Language Classrooms (2025) · cites this paper as Baylor and Ritchie (2002)
ICT training has an important influence on how well ICT is embraced in the classroom.
“Baylor and Ritchie (2002) conclude that ICT training has an important influence on how well ICT is embraced in the classroom.”
From ICT integration in the classroom: Challenging the potential of a school policy (2008) · cites this paper as Baylor and Ritchie (2002)
Leadership is a critical predictor of ICT integration.
“Baylor and Ritchie (2002, p. 412) also describe leadership as a critical predictor of ICT integration, since it focuses on promoting the use of ICT at a strategic and action level: 'school principals who wish to nurture a technology culture need to join in rather than sitting by the side'.”
From ICT integration in the classroom: Challenging the potential of a school policy (2008) · cites this paper as Baylor and Ritchie (2002, p. 412)
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Critical success factors for e-learning acceptance: Confirmatory factor models
Selim, H. M. (2007) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2005.09.004 · Cited by 1,055 · see citing works
Sang, G., Valcke, M., Braak, J. V., & Tondeur, J. (2010) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2009.07.010 · Cited by 840 · see citing works
ICT integration in the classroom: Challenging the potential of a school policy
Tondeur, J., van Keer, H., van Braak, J., & Valcke, M. (2008) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2007.05.003 · Cited by 456 · see citing works
Explaining different types of computer use among primary school teachers
van Braak, J., Tondeur, J., & Valcke, M. (2004) · European Journal of Psychology of Education · doi:10.1007/bf03173218 · Cited by 322 · see citing works
Explaining technology integration in K-12 classrooms: a multilevel path analysis model
Liu, F., Ritzhaupt, A. D., Dawson, K., & Barron, A. E. (2017) · Educational Technology Research and Development · doi:10.1007/s11423-016-9487-9 · Cited by 116 · see citing works
Applications Used in Distance Education in English Language Classrooms
Mahir, M. A. A. (2025) · International Journal of Teaching, Learning and Education · doi:10.22161/ijtle.4.3.3
- Authors
- Baylor, A. L., & Ritchie, D.
- Affiliations
- Florida State University (US)
- San Diego State University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Baylor, Amy L
- Venue
- Computers & Education
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2002-12
- Volume
- 39
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 395-414
- ISSN
- 0360-1315 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2031282991
- Cited by
- 706
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 8 · 2025: 19 · 2024: 22 · 2023: 31 · 2022: 33 · 2021: 30 · 2020: 26 · 2019: 32 · 2018: 41 · 2017: 25 · 2016: 38 · 2015: 83 · 2014: 53 · 2013: 37 · 2012: 48
- FWCI
- 40.59
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Computers & Education (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Education › Education and Technology Integration
- Social Sciences › Education › Education and Communication Studies
- Social Sciences › Education › Teacher Education and Leadership Studies
- Keywords
- educational technology, technology integration, teacher morale, higher-order thinking skills, content acquisition, school technology leadership, professional development, curriculum alignment, technology planning
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
