Cited by 1,055Online and Blended LearningTechnology-Enhanced Education StudiesTechnology Adoption and User Behaviour

Critical success factors for e-learning acceptance: Confirmatory factor models

Selim, Hassan M.·2007·Computers & Education

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.compedu.2005.09.004

Cites

34 of 34 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 35 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Selim, H. M.
Affiliations
United Arab Emirates University (AE)
Corresponding author
Selim, Hassan M.
Venue
Computers & Education
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2007-09
Volume
49
Issue
2
Pages
396-413
ISSN
0360-1315 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2164441776
Cited by
1,055
References
35
Citations by year
2026: 15 · 2025: 17 · 2024: 38 · 2023: 63 · 2022: 94 · 2021: 98 · 2020: 78 · 2019: 68 · 2018: 62 · 2017: 50 · 2016: 70 · 2015: 61 · 2014: 77 · 2013: 64 · 2012: 57
FWCI
30.35
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Computers & Education (publishedVersion)
Funders
Utah Agricultural Experiment Station
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Online and Blended Learning
  • Social Sciences › Education › Technology-Enhanced Education Studies
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Technology Adoption and User Behaviour
Keywords
online learning, success factors, technology acceptance, university students, instructor support, student support, information technology, university support, online course design, factor structure

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review