The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Multi-criteria assessment of new and renewable energy power plants
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Review on multi-criteria decision analysis aid in sustainable energy decision-making
Wang, J.-J., Jing, Y.-Y., Zhang, C.-F., & Zhao, J.-H. (2009) · Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.rser.2009.06.021 · Cited by 2,346
Application of multi-criteria decision making to sustainable energy planning—A review
Pohekar, S. D., & Ramachandran, M. (2004) · Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.rser.2003.12.007 · Cited by 1,938
Energy system analysis of 100% renewable energy systems—The case of Denmark in years 2030 and 2050
Lund, H., & Mathiesen, B. V. (2009) · Energy · doi:10.1016/j.energy.2008.04.003 · Cited by 1,121
Decision making in renewable energy investments: a review
Strantzali, E., & Aravossis, K. (2016) · Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.rser.2015.11.021 · Cited by 400
Renewable energy from Cyanobacteria: energy production optimization by metabolic pathway engineering
Quintana, N., Van der Kooy, F., Van de Rhee, M. D., Voshol, G. P., & Verpoorte, R. (2011) · Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology · doi:10.1007/s00253-011-3394-0 · Cited by 338
Metadata
- Authors
- Afgan, N. H., & Carvalho, M. G.
- Venue
- Energy
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2002-08
- Volume
- 27
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 739-755
- ISSN
- 0360-5442 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1997696532
- Cited by
- 381
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 3.25
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Multi-criteria assessment of new and renewable energy power plants. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/s0360-5442(02)00019-1
- The paper
- Afgan, N. H., & Carvalho, M. G. (2002). Multi-criteria assessment of new and renewable energy power plants. Energy. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0360-5442(02)00019-1
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
