The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Shot noise in mesoscopic conductors
Open accessAbstract
Abstract Theoretical and experimental work concerned with dynamic fluctuations has developed into a very active and fascinating subfield of mesoscopic physics. We present a review of this development focusing on shot noise in small electric conductors. Shot noise is a consequence of the quantization of charge. It can be used to obtain information on a system which is not available through conductance measurements. In particular, shot noise experiments can determine the charge and statistics of the quasiparticles relevant for transport, and reveal information on the potential profile and internal energy scales of mesoscopic systems. Shot noise is generally more sensitive to the effects of electron–electron interactions than the average conductance. We present a discussion based on the conceptually transparent scattering approach and on the classical Langevin and Boltzmann–Langevin methods; in addition a discussion of results which cannot be obtained by these methods is provided. We conclude the review by pointing out a number of unsolved problems and an outlook on the likely future development of the field.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Correlation between Photons in two Coherent Beams of Light
BROWN, R. H., & TWISS, R. Q. (1956) · Nature · doi:10.1038/177027a0 · Cited by 2,573
Random-matrix theory of quantum transport
Beenakker, C. W. J. (1997) · Reviews of Modern Physics · doi:10.1103/revmodphys.69.731 · Cited by 2,551
Tunneling in a finite superlattice
Tsu, R., & Esaki, L. (1973) · Applied Physics Letters · doi:10.1063/1.1654509 · Cited by 2,371
The Fermionic Hanbury Brown and Twiss Experiment
Henny, M., Oberholzer, S., Strunk, C., Heinzel, T., Ensslin, K., Holland, M., & Schönenberger, C. (1999) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.284.5412.296 · Cited by 411
Quantum interference in electron collision
Liu, R. C., Odom, B., Yamamoto, Y., & Tarucha, S. (1998) · Nature · doi:10.1038/34611 · Cited by 249
Cited by
Aspelmeyer, M., Kippenberg, T. J., & Marquardt, F. (2014) · Reviews of Modern Physics · doi:10.1103/revmodphys.86.1391 · Cited by 5,501
A cold-atom Fermi–Hubbard antiferromagnet
Mazurenko, A., Chiu, C. S., Ji, G., Parsons, M. F., Kanász-Nagy, M., Schmidt, R., Grusdt, F., Demler, E., Greif, D., & Greiner, M. (2017) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature22362 · Cited by 788
Free fermion antibunching in a degenerate atomic Fermi gas released from an optical lattice
Rom, T., Best, T., van Oosten, D., Schneider, U., Fölling, S., Paredes, B., & Bloch, I. (2006) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature05319 · Cited by 268
Spatial Quantum Correlations in Multiple Scattered Light
Lodahl, P., Mosk, A. P., & Lagendijk, A. (2005) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.95.173901 · Cited by 68
Cryogenic amplifier for shot noise measurement at 20 mK
Arakawa, T., Nishihara, Y., Maeda, M., Norimoto, S., & Kobayashi, K. (2013) · Applied Physics Letters · doi:10.1063/1.4826681 · Cited by 30
Metadata
- Authors
- Blanter, Y. M., & Büttiker, M.
- Venue
- Physics Reports
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2000-09
- Volume
- 336
- Issue
- 1-2
- Pages
- 1-166
- ISSN
- 0370-1573 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2082702006
- Cited by
- 2,560
- References
- 5
- FWCI
- 39.83
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Shot noise in mesoscopic conductors. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/s0370-1573(99)00123-4
- The paper
- Blanter, Y. M., & Büttiker, M. (2000). Shot noise in mesoscopic conductors. Physics Reports. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0370-1573(99)00123-4
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
