The AdS/CFT correspondence and topological censorship
Open accessIntegrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In Lorentzian signature, AdS geometries with multiple boundaries always contain horizons that separate the different boundaries.
“In lorentzian signature the resolution of this puzzle is well known (Maldacena, 2003): AdS geometries with multiple boundaries always contain horizons that separate the different boundaries (Galloway et al., 2001) 27 .”
From Euclidean Wormholes, Baby Universes, and Their Impact on Particle Physics and Cosmology (2018) · cites this paper as Galloway et al., 2001
Cited by
Sorted by citations
A Covariant Holographic Entanglement Entropy Proposal
Hubeny, V. E., Rangamani, M., & Takayanagi, T. (2007) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.0705.0016 · Cited by 1,822
A covariant holographic entanglement entropy proposal
Hubeny, V. E., Rangamani, M., & Takayanagi, T. (2007) · Journal of High Energy Physics · doi:10.1088/1126-6708/2007/07/062 · Cited by 1,822 · see citing works
Eternal black holes in anti-de Sitter
Maldacena, J. (2003) · Journal of High Energy Physics · doi:10.1088/1126-6708/2003/04/021 · Cited by 1,555 · see citing works
Maximin surfaces, and the strong subadditivity of the covariant holographic entanglement entropy
Wall, A. C. (2014) · Classical and Quantum Gravity · doi:10.1088/0264-9381/31/22/225007 · Cited by 545 · see citing works
Maldacena, J., & Maoz, L. (2004) · Journal of High Energy Physics · doi:10.1088/1126-6708/2004/02/053 · Cited by 426 · see citing works
Causality & holographic entanglement entropy
Headrick, M., Hubeny, V. E., Lawrence, A., & Rangamani, M. (2014) · Journal of High Energy Physics · doi:10.1007/jhep12(2014)162 · Cited by 418 · see citing works
Euclidean Wormholes, Baby Universes, and Their Impact on Particle Physics and Cosmology
Hebecker, A., Mikhail, T., & Soler, P. (2018) · Frontiers in Astronomy and Space Sciences · doi:10.3389/fspas.2018.00035 · Cited by 136 · see citing works
“In lorentzian signature the resolution of this puzzle is well known [223]: AdS geometries with multiple boundaries always contain horizons that separate the different boundaries [224].”
Background
- Authors
- Galloway, G. J., Schleich, K., Witt, D. M., & Woolgar, E.
- Affiliations
- University of Miami (US)
- University of British Columbia (CA)
- University of Alberta (CA)
- Corresponding author
- Galloway, G.J.
- Schleich, K.
- Witt, D.M.
- Woolgar, E.
- Venue
- Physics Letters B
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2001-04
- Volume
- 505
- Issue
- 1-4
- Pages
- 255-262
- ISSN
- 0370-2693 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1531964626
- Cited by
- 107
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2025: 3 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 3 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 4
- FWCI
- 4.30
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Locations
- Physics Letters B (publishedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Nuclear and High Energy Physics › Black Holes and Theoretical Physics
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Relativity and Gravitational Theory
- Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Applied Mathematics › Geometric Analysis and Curvature Flows
- Keywords
- AdS/CFT correspondence, topological censorship, spacetime topology, higher-dimensional gravity, Euclidean topology
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
