The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Constraints on the generalized Chaplygin gas from supernovae observations
Open accessAbstract
We explore the implications of type Ia supernovae (SNIa) observations on flat cosmological models whose matter content is an exotic fluid with equation of state, p=−M4(α+1)/ρα. In this scenario, a single fluid component may drive the Universe from a nonrelativistic matter dominated phase to an accelerated expansion phase behaving, first, like dark matter and in a more recent epoch as dark energy. We show that these models are consistent with current SNIa data for a rather broad range of parameters. However, future SNIa experiments will place stringent constraints on these models, and could safely rule out the special case of a Chaplygin gas (α=1) if the Universe is dominated by a true cosmological constant.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Measurements of Ω and Λ from 42 High‐Redshift Supernovae
Perlmutter, S., Aldering, G., Goldhaber, G., Knop, R. A., Nugent, P., Castro, P. G., Deustua, S., Fabbro, S., Goobar, A., Groom, D. E., et al. (1999) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1086/307221 · Cited by 18,062
Cosmological consequences of a rolling homogeneous scalar field
Ratra, B., & Peebles, P. J. E. (1988) · Physical Review D · doi:10.1103/physrevd.37.3406 · Cited by 4,310
THE CASE FOR A POSITIVE COSMOLOGICAL Λ-TERM
SAHNI, V., & STAROBINSKY, A. (2000) · International Journal of Modern Physics D · doi:10.1142/s0218271800000542 · Cited by 2,767
Cited by
Cosmology and fundamental physics with the Euclid satellite
The Euclid Theory Working Group, Amendola, L., Appleby, S., Avgoustidis, A., Bacon, D., Baker, T., Baldi, M., Bartolo, N., Blanchard, A., Bonvin, C., et al. (2018) · Living Reviews in Relativity · doi:10.1007/s41114-017-0010-3 · Cited by 1,009
Cosmology and Fundamental Physics with the Euclid Satellite
The Euclid Theory Working Group, Amendola, L., Appleby, S., Bacon, D., Baker, T., Baldi, M., Bartolo, N., Blanchard, A., Bonvin, C., Borgani, S., et al. (2013) · Living Reviews in Relativity · doi:10.12942/lrr-2013-6 · Cited by 899
Quintom cosmology: Theoretical implications and observations
Cai, Y.-F., Saridakis, E. N., Setare, M. R., & Xia, J.-Q. (2010) · Physics Reports · doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2010.04.001 · Cited by 868
The end of unified dark matter?
Sandvik, H. B., Tegmark, M., Zaldarriaga, M., & Waga, I. (2004) · Physical Review D · doi:10.1103/physrevd.69.123524 · Cited by 433
Self-citationWMAP and the generalized Chaplygin gas
Amendola, L., Finelli, F., Burigana, C., & Carturan, D. (2003) · Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics · doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2003/07/005 · Cited by 271
Metadata
- Authors
- Makler, M., de Oliveira, S. Q., & Waga, I.
- Venue
- Physics Letters B
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2003-02
- Volume
- 555
- Issue
- 1-2
- Pages
- 1-6
- ISSN
- 0370-2693 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2021155634
- Cited by
- 264
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 13.14
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Constraints on the generalized Chaplygin gas from supernovae observations. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/s0370-2693(03)00038-8
- The paper
- Makler, M., de Oliveira, S. Q., & Waga, I. (2003). Constraints on the generalized Chaplygin gas from supernovae observations. Physics Letters B. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0370-2693(03)00038-8
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
