The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The end of unified dark matter?
Open accessAbstract
Despite the interest in dark matter and dark energy, it has never been shown that they are in fact two separate substances. We provide the first strong evidence that they are separate by ruling out a broad class of so-called unified dark matter models that have attracted much recent interest. We find that they produce oscillations or exponential blowup of the dark matter power spectrum inconsistent with observation. For the particular case of generalized Chaplygin gas models, 99.999% of the previously allowed parameter space is excluded, leaving essentially only the standard $\ensuremath{\Lambda}\mathrm{CDM}$ limit allowed.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Spergel, D. N., Verde, L., Peiris, H. V., Komatsu, E., Nolta, M. R., Bennett, C. L., Halpern, M., Hinshaw, G., Jarosik, N., Kogut, A., et al. (2003) · The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series · doi:10.1086/377226 · Cited by 10,976
Armendáriz-Picón, C., Damour, T., & Mukhanov, V. (1999) · Physics Letters B · doi:10.1016/s0370-2693(99)00603-6 · Cited by 1,846
Cited by
Bamba, K., Capozziello, S., Nojiri, S., & Odintsov, S. D. (2012) · Astrophysics and Space Science · doi:10.1007/s10509-012-1181-8 · Cited by 2,387
Cosmology and Fundamental Physics with the Euclid Satellite
The Euclid Theory Working Group, Amendola, L., Appleby, S., Bacon, D., Baker, T., Baldi, M., Bartolo, N., Blanchard, A., Bonvin, C., Borgani, S., et al. (2013) · Living Reviews in Relativity · doi:10.12942/lrr-2013-6 · Cited by 899
Reconciling dark energy models withf(R)theories
Capozziello, S., Cardone, V. F., & Troisi, A. (2005) · Physical Review D · doi:10.1103/physrevd.71.043503 · Cited by 527
Large-scale instability in interacting dark energy and dark matter fluids
Väliviita, J., Majerotto, E., & Maartens, R. (2008) · Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics · doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2008/07/020 · Cited by 391
Note on bigravity and dark matter
Bañados, M., Gomberoff, A., Rodrigues, D. C., & Skordis, C. (2009) · Physical Review D · doi:10.1103/physrevd.79.063515 · Cited by 47
Metadata
- Authors
- Sandvik, H. B., Tegmark, M., Zaldarriaga, M., & Waga, I.
- Venue
- Physical Review D
- Publisher
- American Physical Society (APS)
- Published
- 2004-06-30
- Volume
- 69
- Issue
- 12
- ISSN
- 0556-2821 (ISSN-L)
- 1550-7998
- 1550-2368
- OpenAlex
- W2041639733
- Cited by
- 433
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 16.54
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The end of unified dark matter? https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1103/physrevd.69.123524
- The paper
- Sandvik, H. B., Tegmark, M., Zaldarriaga, M., & Waga, I. (2004). The end of unified dark matter? Physical Review D. https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevd.69.123524
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
