Cited by 73Quantum Chromodynamics and Particle InteractionsHigh-Energy Particle Collisions ResearchParticle physics theoretical and experimental studies

SU(3) latent heat and surface tension from tree level and tadpole improved actions

Open access
Beinlich, B., Karsch, F., Peikert, A.·1997·Physics Letters B

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0370-2693(96)01401-3

Cites

20 of 20 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • From the small values of surface tension and latent heat found in lattice QCD calculations, the amount of supercooling is found to be small.

    “From the small values of surface tension and latent heat found in lattice QCD calculations [82], the amount of supercooling is found to be small [85].”

    From Phase Transitions in the Early and Present Universe (2006) · cites this paper as [85]

  • After the first bubbles have been nucleated, they grow most probably by weak deflagration.

    “After the first bubbles have been nucleated, they grow most probably by weak deflagration [84, 85, 88, 89].”

    From Phase Transitions in the Early and Present Universe (2006) · cites this paper as [85]

    The Surface Tension section (pp. 4–5) discusses coexisting phases, interfaces, and surface free energy, not how nucleated bubbles grow. Searches for weak deflagration and bubble nucleation or growth found no passage in our copy addressing the claim. (LLM, conf=0.76)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 22 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [6][6] G.P. Lepage and P.B Mackenzie, Phys. Rev. D48 (1993) 2250 M. Alford, W. Dimm, G.P. Lepage, G. Hockney and P.B. Mackenzie, Nucl. Phys. B (Proc. Suppl.) 42 (1995) 787. -

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Beinlich, B., Karsch, F., & Peikert, A.
Affiliations
Bielefeld University (DE)
Venue
Physics Letters B
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1997-01
Volume
390
Issue
1-4
Pages
268-274
ISSN
0370-2693 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2088638642
Cited by
72
References
22
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 1 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 2
FWCI
4.91
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Physics Letters B (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • CERN Document Server (European Organization for Nuclear Research) (submittedVersion)
  • PUB – Publications at Bielefeld University (Bielefeld University) (submittedVersion)
  • Publikationen an der Universität Bielefeld (Universität Bielefeld) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Funders
Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (Pe 340/6-1)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Nuclear and High Energy Physics › Quantum Chromodynamics and Particle Interactions
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Nuclear and High Energy Physics › High-Energy Particle Collisions Research
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Nuclear and High Energy Physics › Particle physics theoretical and experimental studies
Keywords
latent heat, surface tension, cutoff effects, Wilson action, finite temperature QCD, lattice QCD

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review