The DOI matches its Crossref record; 12 of the 12 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Fidelity of single qubit maps
Open accessOverview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Due to the invariance of the Fubini-Study measure the average fidelity depends only on the noise operator and can been expressed in the form [9, 10, 11]”
From Scalable noise estimation with random unitary operators (2005) · cites this paper as [10]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Principles of Nuclear Magnetic Resonance in One and Two Dimensions
Ernst, R. R., Bodenhausen, G., Wokaun, A. J., & Redfield, A. G. (1989) · Physics Today · doi:10.1063/1.2811094 · Cited by 4,202
Quantum information and computation
Bennett, C. H., & DiVincenzo, D. P. (2000) · Nature · doi:10.1038/35005001 · Cited by 3,263
The ‘transition probability’ in the state space of a—algebra
Uhlmann, A. (1976) · Reports on Mathematical Physics · doi:10.1016/0034-4877(76)90060-4 · Cited by 1,649
Principles of nuclear magnetic resonance in one and two dimensions
Redpath, T. W. (1988) · Magnetic Resonance Imaging · doi:10.1016/0730-725x(88)90413-4 · Cited by 1,208
Ensemble quantum computing by NMR spectroscopy
Cory, D. G., Fahmy, A. F., & Havel, T. F. (1997) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.94.5.1634 · Cited by 964
Levitt, M. H. (1986) · Progress in Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy · doi:10.1016/0079-6565(86)80005-x · Cited by 778
Complete Characterization of a Quantum Process: The Two-Bit Quantum Gate
Poyatos, J. F., Cirac, J. I., & Zoller, P. (1997) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.78.390 · Cited by 694
Optimal universal and state-dependent quantum cloning
Bruß, D., DiVincenzo, D. P., Ekert, A., Fuchs, C. A., Macchiavello, C., & Smolin, J. A. (1998) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.57.2368 · Cited by 554
Jones, J. A. (2001) · Progress in Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy · doi:10.1016/s0079-6565(00)00033-9 · Cited by 177
Self-citationEitel, K. (2000) · New Journal of Physics · doi:10.1088/1367-2630/2/1/301 · Cited by 113
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- Cummins, 2000, New J. Phys., 2, 1
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 101–171 of 171
Comparing the randomized benchmarking figure with the average infidelity of a quantum gate-set
Qi, J., & Ng, H. K. (2019) · International Journal of Quantum Information · doi:10.1142/s021974991950031x · Cited by 14
Norms and Cones in the Theory of Quantum EntanglementPreprint
Johnston, N. (2012) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1207.1479 · Cited by 13
Quantum teleportation and thermal entanglement of two-scattering qubit state in graphene lattices
Mhamdi, H., Jebli, L., Habiballah, N., & Nassik, M. (2022) · Modern Physics Letters A · doi:10.1142/s0217732322501504 · Cited by 10
Optical rotation of heavy hole spins by non-Abelian geometrical means
Sun, H., Feng, X., Wu, C., Liu, J., Gong, S., & Oh, C. H. (2009) · Physical Review B · doi:10.1103/physrevb.80.235404 · Cited by 11
On the quantum performance evaluation of two distributed quantum architectures
Vardoyan, G., Skrzypczyk, M., & Wehner, S. (2021) · Performance Evaluation · doi:10.1016/j.peva.2021.102242 · Cited by 10
A 98-qubit trapped-ion quantum computer with all-to-all connectivity
Ransford, A., Allman, M. S., Arkinstall, J., Campora, J. P., Cooper, S. F., Delaney, R. D., Dreiling, J. M., Estey, B., Figgatt, C., Hall, A., et al. (2026) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-026-10676-4 · Cited by 16
Optimized continuous dynamical decoupling via differential geometry and machine learning
Morazotti, N. A. D. C., da Silva, A. H., Audi, G., Fanchini, F. F., & Napolitano, R. D. J. (2024) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.110.042601 · Cited by 9
Toffoli gate based on a three-body fine-structure-state-changing Förster resonance in Rydberg atoms
Ashkarin, I. N., Beterov, I. I., Yakshina, E. A., Tretyakov, D. B., Entin, V. M., Ryabtsev, I. I., Cheinet, P., Pham, K.-L., Lepoutre, S., & Pillet, P. (2022) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.106.032601 · Cited by 10
A bifunctional superconducting cell as flux qubit and neuron
Pashin, D. S., Pikunov, P. V., Bastrakova, M. V., Schegolev, A. E., Klenov, N. V., & Soloviev, I. I. (2023) · Beilstein Journal of Nanotechnology · doi:10.3762/bjnano.14.92 · Cited by 9
Composite-pulse enhanced room-temperature diamond magnetometry
Dong, Y., Xu, J., Zhang, S.-C., Zheng, Y. H., Chen, X.-D., Zhu, W., Wang, G., Guo, G., & Sun, F. (2021) · Functional Diamond · doi:10.1080/26941112.2021.1898792 · Cited by 8
Exploring Quantum Average-Case Distances: Proofs, Properties, and Examples
Maciejewski, F. B., Puchała, Z., & Oszmaniec, M. (2023) · IEEE Transactions on Information Theory · doi:10.1109/tit.2023.3250100 · Cited by 11
Zhang, K., Nusran, N., Slezak, B. R., & Dutt, M. V. G. (2016) · New Journal of Physics · doi:10.1088/1367-2630/18/5/053029 · Cited by 7
Phonon-induced decoherence of a charge quadrupole qubit
Kornich, V., Vavilov, M., Friesen, M. G., & Coppersmith, S. N. (2018) · New Journal of Physics · doi:10.1088/1367-2630/aae61f · Cited by 8
Designing arbitrary single-axis rotations robust against perpendicular time-dependent noise
Li, B., Calderon-Vargas, F. A., Zeng, J., & Barnes, E. (2021) · New Journal of Physics · doi:10.1088/1367-2630/ac22ea · Cited by 11
Quantum spin-flipping by the Faraday mirror
Secondi, V., Sciarrino, F., & Martini, F. D. (2004) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.70.040301 · Cited by 8
Long-range C C Φ gates via radio-frequency-induced Förster resonances
Ashkarin, I. N., Lepoutre, S., Pillet, P., Beterov, I. I., Ryabtsev, I. I., & Cheinet, P. (2025) · Physical Review Research · doi:10.1103/physrevresearch.7.013034 · Cited by 8
Rescaling Interactions for Quantum Control
Bhole, G., Tsunoda, T., Leek, P., & Jones, J. A. (2020) · Physical Review Applied · doi:10.1103/physrevapplied.13.034002 · Cited by 8
Self-citationSingle qubit gates with jump and return sequences
Bowdrey, M. D., & Jones, J. A. (2006) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.74.052324 · Cited by 7
Self-citationOn-chip polarization-encoded single-qubit gates with twisted waveguides
Morozko, F., Novitsky, A. V., Mikhalychev, A. B., & Karabchevsky, A. (2023) · Physical Review Research · doi:10.1103/physrevresearch.5.043155 · Cited by 6
Regularized maximum pure-state input-output fidelity of a quantum channel
Ernst, M., & Klesse, R. (2017) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.96.062319 · Cited by 6
Qubit coherent control and entanglement with squeezed light fields
Shahmoon, E., Levit, S., & Ozeri, R. (2009) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.80.033803 · Cited by 6
Optimal transfer of an unknown state via a bipartite quantum operation
Liu, Y., Guo, Y., & Zhou, D. (2013) · Europhysics Letters (EPL) · doi:10.1209/0295-5075/102/50003 · Cited by 6
Fidelity-disturbance-entropy tradeoff in quantum channels
Sun, Y., Li, N., & Luo, S. (2022) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.105.062458 · Cited by 5
Robust optimal control for a systematic error in the control amplitude of transmon qubits
Cykiert, M., & Ginossar, E. (2024) · Physica Scripta · doi:10.1088/1402-4896/ad7540 · Cited by 5
State-independent purity and fidelity of quantum operations
Kong, F., Zong, X.-L., Yang, M., & Cao, Z. (2016) · Laser Physics Letters · doi:10.1088/1612-2011/13/4/045201 · Cited by 5
Saturable Purcell filter for circuit quantum electrodynamics
Iakoupov, I., & Koshino, K. (2023) · Physical Review Research · doi:10.1103/physrevresearch.5.013148 · Cited by 5
Han, H. S., Lee, H. G., & Cho, D. (2019) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.122.133201 · Cited by 5
Manipulation of the dynamics of many-body systems via quantum control methods
Dinerman, J., & dos Santos, L. F. (2010) · New Journal of Physics · doi:10.1088/1367-2630/12/5/055025 · Cited by 5
Course 10 Nuclear magnetic resonance quantum computation
Jones, J. A. (2004) · Les Houches/Les Houches · doi:10.1016/s0924-8099(03)80034-3 · Cited by 5
Self-citationZwanenburg, M. F. S., Singh, S., Huang, E. Y., Yilmaz, F., Stefanski, T. V., Hu, J., Kumaravadivel, P., & Andersen, C. K. (2025) · Physical Review Research · doi:10.1103/z62h-kcnh · Cited by 7
Implementation of Single-Qubit Gates via Parametric Modulation in the Majorana Transmon
Lupo, E., Grosfeld, E., & Ginossar, E. (2022) · PRX Quantum · doi:10.1103/prxquantum.3.020340 · Cited by 4
On the Quantum Performance Evaluation of Two Distributed Quantum Architectures
Vardoyan, G., Skrzypczyk, M., & Wehner, S. (2022) · ACM SIGMETRICS Performance Evaluation Review · doi:10.1145/3529113.3529123 · Cited by 4
Non-Markovianity and memory of the initial state
Hinarejos, M., Bañuls, M. C., Pérez, A., & de Vega, I. (2017) · Journal of Physics A Mathematical and Theoretical · doi:10.1088/1751-8121/aa7972 · Cited by 4
Augmented fidelities for single-qubit gates
Wudarski, F., Marshall, J., Petukhov, A. G., & Rieffel, E. G. (2020) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.102.052612 · Cited by 4
Dan, G., Zhen-Shuang, Z., Zhu, A., Wang, H., Xiao-Qiang, S., & Shou, Z. (2010) · Chinese Physics B · doi:10.1088/1674-1056/19/9/090313 · Cited by 4
Effect of an Ohmic environment on an optimally controlled flux-biased phase qubit
Poudel, A., & Vavilov, M. (2010) · Physical Review B · doi:10.1103/physrevb.82.144528 · Cited by 4
Nonadiabatic geometric rotation of an electron spin in a quantum dot by 2π hyperbolic secant pulses
Pei, P., Zhang, F.-Y., Li, C., & Song, H.-S. (2010) · Journal of Physics B Atomic Molecular and Optical Physics · doi:10.1088/0953-4075/43/12/125504 · Cited by 4
Strečka, J., Benabdallah, F., & Mohammed Daoud, A. (2025) · Physica Scripta · doi:10.1088/1402-4896/ae02f9 · Cited by 3
Genetic Algorithm for Searching Bipolar Single-Flux-Quantum Pulse Sequences for Qubit Control
Bastrakova, M. V., Kulandin, D. S., Laptyeva, T. V., Vozhakov, V. A., & Liniov, A. (2023) · Lobachevskii Journal of Mathematics · doi:10.1134/s1995080223010043 · Cited by 3
Yan, F.-F., Xu, Z., Li, Q., Wang, J., Zhou, J.-Y., Lin, W.-X., Xu, J., Wang, Y., Li, C., & Guo, G. (2021) · Physical Review Applied · doi:10.1103/physrevapplied.16.024027 · Cited by 3
Bifurcation Oscillator as an Advanced Sensor for Quantum State Control
Pashin, D. S., Bastrakova, M. V., Михайлович, С. А., & Klenov, N. V. (2022) · Sensors · doi:10.3390/s22176580 · Cited by 3
Operation fidelity explored by numerical range of Kraus operators
Chełstowski, I., Rajchel-Mieldzioć, G., & Życzkowski, K. (2023) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.108.022409 · Cited by 3
Quantum gate-assisted teleportation in noisy environments: robustness and fidelity improvement
Harraz, S., Zhang, J., & Cong, S. (2023) · Communications in Theoretical Physics · doi:10.1088/1572-9494/ad1325 · Cited by 3
Robust quantum optimal control for Markovian quantum systems
Liu, R., Yang, X., & Li, J. (2024) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.110.012402 · Cited by 4
Symmetrization methods for characterization and benchmarking of quantum processes
Emerson, J. (2008) · Canadian Journal of Physics · doi:10.1139/p07-192 · Cited by 3
Probabilistic minimal disturbance measurement of symmetrical qubit states
Filip, R., Mišta, L., Martini, F. D., Ricci, M., & Sciarrino, F. (2006) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.74.052312 · Cited by 3
Logical channel for heralded and pure loss with the Gottesman-Kitaev-Preskill code
Harris, T. B., Matsuura, T., Baragiola, B. Q., & Menicucci, N. C. (2025) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/rmlm-vbfd · Cited by 5
Quantum state transfer: interplay between gate and readout errors
Thotakura, B., & Wei, T.-C. (2023) · Quantum Information Processing · doi:10.1007/s11128-023-04030-0 · Cited by 3
Scalable approaches to the characterization of open quantum system dynamics
López, C. C. (2009) · DSpace@MIT (Massachusetts Institute of Technology) · Cited by 2
Quantum qubit switch: entropy and entanglementPreprint
Sawerwain, M., & Wiśniewska, J. (2017) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1709.02407 · Cited by 2
Naji, A. (2025) · Quantum Information Processing · doi:10.1007/s11128-024-04641-1 · Cited by 1
Lamine, M. A., & Hamid Ez-zahraouy, A. (2026) · Journal of Magnetism and Magnetic Materials · doi:10.1016/j.jmmm.2026.173869 · Cited by 1
Omari, F., Asri, S. E., Mouslih, S., Jakha, M., Manaut, B., & Taj, S. (2026) · Journal of Low Temperature Physics · doi:10.1007/s10909-026-03370-2 · Cited by 1
Effect of component variations on the gate fidelity in linear optical networks
Crickmore, J., Frazer, J., Shaw, S., & Kok, P. (2016) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.94.022326 · Cited by 1
Sawerwain, M., & Wiśniewska, J. (2016) · Wireless Personal Communications · doi:10.1007/s11277-016-3749-z · Cited by 1
Demystifying Quantum Gate Fidelity for Electronics Engineers
Borgarino, M., & Badiali, A. (2025) · Applied Sciences · doi:10.3390/app15052675 · Cited by 3
Testing the limits of nonlocality
Altepeter, J. B. (2006) · Illinois Digital Environment for Access to Learning and Scholarship (University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign) · Cited by 1
Pulse-level characterization of qubits on quantum devices
Salamanca, Q., & Andrés, D. B. (2021) · Cited by 1
Accurate Qubit Control with Single Flux Quantum PulsesPreprint
McDermott, R., & Vavilov, M. (2014) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1408.0390 · Cited by 1
On single-crystal solid-state NMR based quantum information processing.
Moussa, O. (2010) · UWSpace (University of Waterloo) · Cited by 1
Pulse optimization for multi-qubit gates in transmon system
Hortensius, J. R. (2015) · Research Repository (Delft University of Technology)
On the robustness of holonomic quantum computation
Lupo, C. (2008) · Università degli Studi di Napoli Federico II · doi:10.6092/unina/fedoa/1789
Room temperature caesium quantum memory for quantum information applicationsPreprint
Michelberger, P. (2015) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1706.01104
Exponential enhancement of multi-photon entanglement rate via quantum interference bufferingPreprint
Meyer-Scott, E., Prasannan, N., Dhand, I., Eigner, C., Quiring, V., Barkhofen, S., Brecht, B., Plenio, M. B., & Silberhorn, C. (2019) · arXiv (Cornell University)
Engineering fast high-fidelity quantum operations with constrained interactions
Roque, T. F., Clerk, A. A., & Ribeiro, H. (2021) · npj Quantum Information · doi:10.1038/s41534-020-00349-z
O(1) benchmarking of precise rotation in a spin-squeezed Bose-Einstein condensate
Du, P. D., Tang, H., Zhang, J., & Zhang, W. (2023) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.107.053315
Jesus, J. D. D. C., Li, B., Gao, Y., Barends, R., Cárdenas-López, F. A., & Motzoi, F. (2026) · PRX Quantum · doi:10.1103/sdxb-v39h · Cited by 4
Erasure Conversion in Integer Fluxonium Qubits
Wang, J., Mencia, R., Manucharyan, V., & Vavilov, M. (2026) · PRX Quantum · doi:10.1103/jszm-48h7 · Cited by 2
Few-body Förster resonances in Rydberg atoms for the implementation of quantum computing
Ashkarin, I. N. (2023) · theses.fr (ABES) · doi:10.70675/eebef4cdzf16dz4fbcz9077z90e6d536c474
Entangling power and fidelity diagnostics for bipartite quantum channels
Rudziński, M., Tartaglione, G., & Życzkowski, K. (2026) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/gkc7-tkbq · Cited by 2
Abd‐Rabbou, M. Y., Aljuaydi, F., Jaradat, E. K., & Alghwali, A. S. A. (2026) · Quantum Information Processing · doi:10.1007/s11128-026-05348-1
Metadata
- Authors
- Bowdrey, M. D., Oi, D. K. L., Short, A. J., Banaszek, K., & Jones, J. A.
- Affiliations
- University of Oxford (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Jones, Jonathan A.
- Venue
- Physics Letters A
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2002-03
- Volume
- 294
- Issue
- 5-6
- Pages
- 258-260
- ISSN
- 0375-9601 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2170140113
- Cited by
- 172
- References
- 12
- Citations by year
- 2026: 7 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 18 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 5
- FWCI
- 6.57
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Locations
- Physics Letters A (publishedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- CERN Document Server (European Organization for Nuclear Research) (submittedVersion)
- Bristol Research (University of Bristol) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Quantum Information and Cryptography
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Quantum Computing Algorithms and Architecture
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Quantum Mechanics and Applications
- Keywords
- average fidelity, single-qubit operations, unitary operators, quantum channel characterization, nuclear magnetic resonance, quantum state preparation and measurement
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review