The DOI matches its Crossref record; 12 of the 12 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Fidelity of single qubit maps
Open accessOverview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Due to the invariance of the Fubini-Study measure the average fidelity depends only on the noise operator and can been expressed in the form [9, 10, 11]”
From Scalable noise estimation with random unitary operators (2005) · cites this paper as [10]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Principles of Nuclear Magnetic Resonance in One and Two Dimensions
Ernst, R. R., Bodenhausen, G., Wokaun, A. J., & Redfield, A. G. (1989) · Physics Today · doi:10.1063/1.2811094 · Cited by 4,202
Quantum information and computation
Bennett, C. H., & DiVincenzo, D. P. (2000) · Nature · doi:10.1038/35005001 · Cited by 3,263
The ‘transition probability’ in the state space of a—algebra
Uhlmann, A. (1976) · Reports on Mathematical Physics · doi:10.1016/0034-4877(76)90060-4 · Cited by 1,649
Principles of nuclear magnetic resonance in one and two dimensions
Redpath, T. W. (1988) · Magnetic Resonance Imaging · doi:10.1016/0730-725x(88)90413-4 · Cited by 1,208
Ensemble quantum computing by NMR spectroscopy
Cory, D. G., Fahmy, A. F., & Havel, T. F. (1997) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.94.5.1634 · Cited by 964
Levitt, M. H. (1986) · Progress in Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy · doi:10.1016/0079-6565(86)80005-x · Cited by 778
Complete Characterization of a Quantum Process: The Two-Bit Quantum Gate
Poyatos, J. F., Cirac, J. I., & Zoller, P. (1997) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.78.390 · Cited by 694
Optimal universal and state-dependent quantum cloning
Bruß, D., DiVincenzo, D. P., Ekert, A., Fuchs, C. A., Macchiavello, C., & Smolin, J. A. (1998) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.57.2368 · Cited by 554
Jones, J. A. (2001) · Progress in Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy · doi:10.1016/s0079-6565(00)00033-9 · Cited by 177
Self-citationEitel, K. (2000) · New Journal of Physics · doi:10.1088/1367-2630/2/1/301 · Cited by 113
Universal manipulation of a single qubit
Hardy, L., & Song, D. D. (2001) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.63.032304 · Cited by 14
Nonlinear qubit transformations
Hardy, L., & Song, D. D. (2001) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.64.032301 · Cited by 8
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- Cummins, 2000, New J. Phys., 2, 1
Cited by
Sorted by citations
NMR techniques for quantum control and computation
Vandersypen, L. M. K., & Chuang, I. L. (2005) · Reviews of Modern Physics · doi:10.1103/revmodphys.76.1037 · Cited by 1,217
Simple Pulses for Elimination of Leakage in Weakly Nonlinear Qubits
Motzoi, F., Gambetta, J. M., Rebentrost, P., & Wilhelm, F. K. (2009) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.103.110501 · Cited by 814
A simple formula for the average gate fidelity of a quantum dynamical operation
Nielsen, M. A. (2002) · Physics Letters A · doi:10.1016/s0375-9601(02)01272-0 · Cited by 725
Distance measures to compare real and ideal quantum processes
Gilchrist, A., Langford, N. K., & Nielsen, M. A. (2005) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.71.062310 · Cited by 548
Scalable noise estimation with random unitary operators
Emerson, J., Alicki, R., & Życzkowski, K. (2005) · Journal of Optics B: Quantum and Semiclassical Optics · doi:10.1088/1464-4266/7/10/021 · Cited by 502
Metadata
- Authors
- Bowdrey, M. D., Oi, D. K. L., Short, A. J., Banaszek, K., & Jones, J. A.
- Affiliations
- University of Oxford (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Jones, Jonathan A.
- Venue
- Physics Letters A
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2002-03
- Volume
- 294
- Issue
- 5-6
- Pages
- 258-260
- ISSN
- 0375-9601 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2170140113
- Cited by
- 172
- References
- 12
- Citations by year
- 2026: 7 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 18 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 5
- FWCI
- 6.57
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Locations
- Physics Letters A (publishedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- CERN Document Server (European Organization for Nuclear Research) (submittedVersion)
- Bristol Research (University of Bristol) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Quantum Information and Cryptography
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Quantum Computing Algorithms and Architecture
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Quantum Mechanics and Applications
- Keywords
- average fidelity, single-qubit operations, unitary operators, quantum channel characterization, nuclear magnetic resonance, quantum state preparation and measurement
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
