The DOI matches its Crossref record; 7 of the 7 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Distance measures to compare real and ideal quantum processes
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The average gate fidelity of the experimental quantum CNOT gate is F = 0.82 ± 0.01.
“our results show that the average gate fidelity of our experimental quantum CNOT gate is F = 0 . 82 ± 0 . 01.”
From Realization of a Knill-Laflamme-Milburn controlled-NOT photonic quantum circuit combining effective optical nonlinearities (2011) · cites this paper as [28]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Quantum Computation and Quantum Information
Nielsen, M. A., Chuang, I., & Grover, L. K. (2002) · American Journal of Physics · doi:10.1119/1.1463744 · Cited by 21,895
Self-citationTeleporting an unknown quantum state via dual classical and Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen channels
Bennett, C. H., Brassard, G., Crépeau, C., Jozsa, R., Peres, A., & Wootters, W. K. (1993) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.70.1895 · Cited by 13,703
A scheme for efficient quantum computation with linear optics
Knill, E., Laflamme, R., & Milburn, G. J. (2001) · Nature · doi:10.1038/35051009 · Cited by 5,880
The ‘transition probability’ in the state space of a—algebra
Uhlmann, A. (1976) · Reports on Mathematical Physics · doi:10.1016/0034-4877(76)90060-4 · Cited by 1,649
Bernstein, E., & Vazirani, U. (1993) · Proceedings of the twenty-fifth annual ACM symposium on Theory of computing - STOC '93 · doi:10.1145/167088.167097 · Cited by 1,284
Noncommuting Mixed States Cannot Be Broadcast
Barnum, H., Caves, C. M., Fuchs, C. A., Jozsa, R., & Schumacher, B. (1996) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.76.2818 · Cited by 654
Bowdrey, M. D., Oi, D. K. L., Short, A. J., Banaszek, K., & Jones, J. A. (2002) · Physics Letters A · doi:10.1016/s0375-9601(02)00069-5 · Cited by 172
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 26
- 10.1016/0003-4916(91)90182-8 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevA.53.2998 · DOI
- I. L. Chuang, 1997, J. Mod. Opt., 44, 2455, 10.1080/09500349708231894 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1103/PhysRevLett.78.390 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1103/PhysRevLett.93.040506 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevA.64.022321 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevLett.87.077903 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevA.64.010301 · DOI
- 10.1088/1464-4266/1/4/321 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevA.60.4354 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/S0375-9601(02)01272-0 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/S0375-9601(01)00640-5 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevA.64.012314 · DOI · Paper page
- A. M. Childs, 2000, J. Mod. Opt., 47, 155, 10.1080/09500340008244034 · DOI
- 10.1137/S0097539796300921 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1103/PhysRevA.54.2614 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevA.51.2738 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/0034-4877(72)90011-0 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1142/S0129055X94000407 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevA.66.044301 · DOI
- 10.1109/18.761271 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevLett.71.1291 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1103/PhysRevLett.77.1 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevA.60.1888 · DOI · Paper page
- S. Boyd, 2004, Convex Optimization, 10.1017/CBO9780511804441 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1126/science.275.5298.350 · DOI · Paper page
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Quantum internet: a vision for the road ahead
Wehner, S., Elkouss, D., & Hanson, R. (2018) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aam9288 · Cited by 2,467
Gühne, O., & Tóth, G. (2009) · Physics Reports · doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2009.02.004 · Cited by 2,401
The Theory of Quantum Information
Watrous, J. (2018) · doi:10.1017/9781316848142 · Cited by 1,325
An open-system quantum simulator with trapped ions
Barreiro, J. T., Müller, M., Schindler, P., Nigg, D., Monz, T., Chwalla, M., Hennrich, M., Roos, C. F., Zoller, P., & Blatt, R. (2011) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature09801 · Cited by 1,100
Universal Digital Quantum Simulation with Trapped Ions
Lanyon, B. P., Hempel, C., Nigg, D., Müller, M., Gerritsma, R., Zähringer, F., Schindler, P., Barreiro, J. T., Rambach, M., Kirchmair, G., et al. (2011) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1208001 · Cited by 613
Measure for the non-Markovianity of quantum processes
Laine, E.-M., Piilo, J., & Breuer, H.-P. (2010) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.81.062115 · Cited by 484
Evenly distributed unitaries: On the structure of unitary designs
Gross, D., Audenaert, K., & Eisert, J. (2007) · Journal of Mathematical Physics · doi:10.1063/1.2716992 · Cited by 358
A Fully Quantum Asymptotic Equipartition Property
Tomamichel, M., Colbeck, R., & Renner, R. (2009) · IEEE Transactions on Information Theory · doi:10.1109/tit.2009.2032797 · Cited by 356
Experimental Demonstration of a Compiled Version of Shor’s Algorithm with Quantum Entanglement
Lanyon, B. P., Weinhold, T. J., Langford, N. K., Barbieri, M., James, D. F. V., Gilchrist, A., & White, A. G. (2007) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.99.250505 · Cited by 327
Self-citationSingle ion qubit with estimated coherence time exceeding one hour
Wang, P., Luan, C.-Y., Qiao, M., Um, M., Zhang, J., Wang, Y., Yuan, X., Gu, M., Zhang, J., & Kim, K. (2021) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-020-20330-w · Cited by 321
Demonstration of a Simple Entangling Optical Gate and Its Use in Bell-State Analysis
Langford, N. K., Weinhold, T. J., Prevedel, R., Resch, K. J., Gilchrist, A., O’Brien, J. L., Pryde, G. J., & White, A. G. (2005) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.95.210504 · Cited by 262
Self-citationInitial correlations in open-systems dynamics: The Jaynes-Cummings model
Smirne, A., Breuer, H.-P., Piilo, J., & Vacchini, B. (2010) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.82.062114 · Cited by 125
General Conditions for Approximate Quantum Error Correction and Near-Optimal Recovery Channels
Bény, C., & Oreshkov, O. (2010) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.104.120501 · Cited by 126
The Information-Disturbance Tradeoff and the Continuity of Stinespring's Representation
Kretschmann, D., Schlingemann, D., & Werner, R. F. (2008) · IEEE Transactions on Information Theory · doi:10.1109/tit.2008.917696 · Cited by 122
Okamoto, R., O’Brien, J. L., Hofmann, H. F., & Takeuchi, S. (2011) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1018839108 · Cited by 92
Experimental quantum process tomography of non-trace-preserving maps
Bongioanni, I., Sansoni, L., Sciarrino, F., Vallone, G., & Mataloni, P. (2010) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.82.042307 · Cited by 79
Mitigating algorithmic errors in a Hamiltonian simulation
Endo, S., Zhao, Q., Li, Y., Benjamin, S., & Yuan, X. (2019) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.99.012334 · Cited by 72
All-optical-fiber polarization-based quantum logic gate
Clark, A. S., Fulconis, J., Rarity, J. G., Wadsworth, W. J., & O’Brien, J. L. (2009) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.79.030303 · Cited by 65
Baldwin, C. H., Mayer, K., Brown, N. C., Ryan-Anderson, C., & Hayes, D. (2022) · Quantum · doi:10.22331/q-2022-05-09-707 · Cited by 54
Quantum simulation of interacting high-dimensional systems: The influence of noise
Dür, W., Bremner, M. J., & Briegel, H. J. (2008) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.78.052325 · Cited by 41
A small quantum computer is needed to optimize fault-tolerant protocols
Iyer, P., & Poulin, D. (2018) · Quantum Science and Technology · doi:10.1088/2058-9565/aab73c · Cited by 34
Quantum algorithms for classical lattice models
De las Cuevas, G., Dür, W., Van den Nest, M., & Martin-Delgado, M. A. (2011) · New Journal of Physics · doi:10.1088/1367-2630/13/9/093021 · Cited by 40
Efficient and scalable quantum walk algorithms via the quantum Fourier transform
Shakeel, A. (2020) · Quantum Information Processing · doi:10.1007/s11128-020-02834-y · Cited by 23
Metadata
- Authors
- Gilchrist, A., Langford, N. K., & Nielsen, M. A.
- Venue
- Physical Review A
- Publisher
- American Physical Society (APS)
- Published
- 2005-06-13
- Volume
- 71
- Issue
- 6
- ISSN
- 1050-2947
- 1094-1622
- Cited by
- 548
- References
- 7
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
