Cited by 314Complex Systems and Decision MakingSimulation Techniques and ApplicationsModeling and Simulation Systems

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 66 of the 68 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Model calibration as a testing strategy for system dynamics models

Oliva, Rogelio·2003·European Journal of Operational Research

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0377-2217(02)00622-7

Cites

66 of 66 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 68 references

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. Bell, 1980, Methods for enhancing refutability in system dynamics modeling, TIMS Studies in the Management Sciences, 14, 61
  2. Forrester, 1980, Tests for building confidence in system dynamics models, TIMS Studies in the Management Sciences, 14, 209
  3. Senge, P.M., 1978. The system dynamics investment function: A comparison of the neoclassical investment function. PhD Thesis, Sloan School of Management, MIT, Cambridge, MA
  4. Sterman, 1984, Appropriate summary statistics for evaluating the historical fit of system dynamics models, Dynamica, 10, 51

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Oliva, R.
Affiliations
Harvard University (US)
Corresponding author
Oliva, Rogelio
Venue
European Journal of Operational Research
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2003-12
Volume
151
Issue
3
Pages
552-568
ISSN
0377-2217 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2150086489
Cited by
314
References
68
Citations by year
2026: 17 · 2025: 18 · 2024: 20 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 23 · 2019: 16 · 2018: 21 · 2017: 19 · 2016: 27 · 2015: 19 · 2014: 14 · 2013: 13 · 2012: 12
FWCI
7.55
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • European Journal of Operational Research (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Complex Systems and Decision Making
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Simulation Techniques and Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Modeling and Simulation › Modeling and Simulation Systems
Keywords
system dynamics modeling, model calibration, model testing, hypothesis testing, structure-behavior relationship, parameter estimation, model validation, decision-making

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review