The DOI matches its Crossref record; 36 of the 36 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The classification of coherence relations and their linguistic markers: An exploration of two languages
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Rhetorical Structure Theory: Toward a functional theory of text organization
MANN, W. C., & THOMPSON, S. A. (1988) · Text - Interdisciplinary Journal for the Study of Discourse · doi:10.1515/text.1.1988.8.3.243 · Cited by 3,853
The Psychology of Written Composition
Cumming, A., Bereiter, C., & Scardamalia, M. (1989) · The Modern Language Journal · doi:10.2307/327270 · Cited by 2,807
Attention, intentions, and the structure of discourse
Grosz, B. J., & Sidner, C. L. (1986) · doi:10.5555/12457.12458 · Cited by 2,580
English Text: System and structure
Martin, J. R. (1992) · John Benjamins Publishing Company eBooks · doi:10.1075/z.59 · Cited by 1,451
Psychology of Reasoning: Structure and Content
Wason, P. C., & Johnson-Laird, P. N. (1972) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 1,421
From etymology to pragmatics metaphorical and cultural aspects of semantic structure
Sweetser, E. E. (1994) · Cited by 1,309
Causal thinking and the representation of narrative events
Trabasso, T., & van den Broek, P. (1985) · Journal of Memory and Language · doi:10.1016/0749-596x(85)90049-x · Cited by 1,069
Hobbs, J. R. (1979) · Cognitive Science · doi:10.1207/s15516709cog0301_4 · Cited by 906
RHETORICAL STRUCTURE THEORY: A THEORY OF TEXT ORGANIZATION
Mann, W. C. (1987) · Cited by 892
Toward a taxonomy of coherence relations
Sanders, T. J. M., Spooren, W. P. M., & Noordman, L. G. M. (1992) · Discourse Processes · doi:10.1080/01638539209544800 · Cited by 800
Self-citation
Cited by
Rhetorical Structure Theory: looking back and moving ahead
Taboada, M., & Mann, W. C. (2006) · Discourse Studies · doi:10.1177/1461445606061881 · Cited by 451
The Role of Coherence Relations and Their Linguistic Markers in Text Processing
Sanders, T. J. M., & Noordman, L. G. M. (2000) · Discourse Processes · doi:10.1207/s15326950dp2901_3 · Cited by 405
Self-citationAn unsupervised approach to recognizing discourse relations
Marcu, D., & Echihabi, A. (2001) · Proceedings of the 40th Annual Meeting on Association for Computational Linguistics - ACL '02 · doi:10.3115/1073083.1073145 · Cited by 382
From Argument Diagrams to Argumentation Mining in Texts: A Survey
Peldszus, A., & Stede, M. (2013) · International Journal of Cognitive Informatics and Natural Intelligence · doi:10.4018/jcini.2013010101 · Cited by 276
Metadata
- Authors
- Knott, A., & Sanders, T.
- Venue
- Journal of Pragmatics
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 1998-08
- Volume
- 30
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 135-175
- ISSN
- 0378-2166 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1968871606
- Cited by
- 278
- References
- 36
- FWCI
- 58.81
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The classification of coherence relations and their linguistic markers: An exploration of two languages. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/s0378-2166(98)00023-x
- The paper
- Knott, A., & Sanders, T. (1998). The classification of coherence relations and their linguistic markers: An exploration of two languages. Journal of Pragmatics. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0378-2166(98)00023-x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
