The DOI matches its Crossref record; 25 of the 25 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
What are discourse markers?
Open accessAbstract
This paper is an attempt to clarify the status of discourse markers. These lexical expressions have been studied under various labels, including discourse markers, discourse connectives, discourse operators, pragmatic connectives, sentence connectives, and cue phrases. Although most researchers agree that they are expressions which relate discourse segments, there is no agreement on how they are to be defined or how they function. After reviewing prior theoretical research, I define discourse markers as a class of lexical expressions drawn primarily from the syntactic classes of conjunctions, adverbs, and prepositional phrases. With certain exceptions, they signal a relationship between the interpretation of the segment they introduce, S2, and the prior segment, S1. They have a core meaning, which is procedural, not conceptual, and their more specific interpretation is ‘negotiated’ by the context, both linguistic and conceptual. There are two types: those that relate the explicit interpretation conveyed by S2 with some aspect associated with the segment, S1; and those that relate the topic of S2 to that of S1. I conclude by presenting what appears to be the major classes according to their function.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A Comprehensive Grammar of the English Language
Huddleston, R., Quirk, R., Greenbaum, S., Leech, G., & Svartvik, J. (1988) · Language · doi:10.2307/415437 · Cited by 7,587
Halliday, M. A. K., & Hasan, R. (2014) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9781315836010 · Cited by 6,082
Rhetorical Structure Theory: Toward a functional theory of text organization
MANN, W. C., & THOMPSON, S. A. (1988) · Text - Interdisciplinary Journal for the Study of Discourse · doi:10.1515/text.1.1988.8.3.243 · Cited by 3,853
From Etymology to Pragmatics: Metaphorical and Cultural Aspects of Semantic Structure
Sweetser, E. (1990) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511620904 · Cited by 2,963
Semantic constraints on relevance
(1988) · Lingua · doi:10.1016/0024-3841(88)90024-1 · Cited by 1,428
Wilson, D., & Sperber, D. (1993) · Lingua · doi:10.1016/0024-3841(93)90058-5 · Cited by 908
RHETORICAL STRUCTURE THEORY: A THEORY OF TEXT ORGANIZATION
Mann, W. C. (1987) · Cited by 892
An approach to discourse markers
Fraser, B. (1990) · Journal of Pragmatics · doi:10.1016/0378-2166(90)90096-v · Cited by 813
Self-citationToward a taxonomy of coherence relations
Sanders, T. J. M., Spooren, W. P. M., & Noordman, L. G. M. (1992) · Discourse Processes · doi:10.1080/01638539209544800 · Cited by 800
On the coherence and structure of discourse
Hobbs, J. R. (1985) · Center for the Study of Language and Information eBooks · Cited by 525
Cited by
Rhetorical Structure Theory: looking back and moving ahead
Taboada, M., & Mann, W. C. (2006) · Discourse Studies · doi:10.1177/1461445606061881 · Cited by 451
Talking Back: "Small" Interactional Response Tokens in Everyday Conversation
McCarthy, M. (2003) · Research on Language & Social Interaction · doi:10.1207/s15327973rlsi3601_3 · Cited by 393
Discourse Markers and Spoken English: Native and Learner Use in Pedagogic Settings
Fung, L., & Carter, R. (2007) · Applied Linguistics · doi:10.1093/applin/amm030 · Cited by 364
Bilingual discourse markers in Puerto Rican Spanish
TORRES, L. (2002) · Language in Society · doi:10.1017/s0047404502001033 · Cited by 118
Automatic coding of dialogue acts in collaboration protocols
Erkens, G., & Janssen, J. (2008) · International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning · doi:10.1007/s11412-008-9052-6 · Cited by 103
Metadata
- Authors
- Fraser, B.
- Venue
- Journal of Pragmatics
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 1999-07
- Volume
- 31
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 931-952
- ISSN
- 0378-2166 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2090599418
- Cited by
- 1,295
- References
- 25
- FWCI
- 56.26
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: What are discourse markers? https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/s0378-2166(98)00101-5
- The paper
- Fraser, B. (1999). What are discourse markers? Journal of Pragmatics. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0378-2166(98)00101-5
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.