The DOI matches its Crossref record; 39 of the 39 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Talking Back: "Small" Interactional Response Tokens in Everyday Conversation
Abstract
Because many studies of small talk (and talk in general) focus on the input of main speakers, the verbal behavior of listeners is often underrepresented in descriptions of interaction. The notion of small talk as talk superfluous to transactional exigencies enables us to encompass a variety of phenomena, including phatic exchanges, relational language, and various types of insertion sequence. This article adds to this range of phenomena by examining a set of high-frequency short listener response tokens that fulfill the criteria of being superfluous to transactional needs, of being focused on the interpersonal plane of discourse, and of having social functions that seem to overlap with those of phatic and relational episodes in different types of talk. Probably because the items involved are themselves "small" (in that their position is often difficult to locate on the cline from back-channels to full turns), their relational importance is easily overlooked.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking for conversation
Sacks, H., Schegloff, E. A., & Jefferson, G. (1974) · Language · doi:10.2307/412243 · Cited by 11,350
Gumperz, J. J. (1982) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511611834 · Cited by 5,861
Agreeing and disagreeing with assessments: some features of preferred/dispreferred turn shapes
Pomerantz, A. (1985) · Structures of Social Action · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511665868.008 · Cited by 2,905
Schiffrin, D. (1987) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511611841 · Cited by 2,810
Conversational Organization: Interaction Between Speakers and Hearers
Goodwin, C. (1981) · Cited by 2,305
Turn organization: one intersection of grammar and interaction
Schegloff, E. A. (1996) · Interaction and Grammar · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511620874.002 · Cited by 1,615
Schiffrin, D. (1994) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 1,394
Some signals and rules for taking speaking turns in conversations.
Duncan, S. (1972) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/h0033031 · Cited by 1,385
Fraser, B. (1999) · Journal of Pragmatics · doi:10.1016/s0378-2166(98)00101-5 · Cited by 1,295
The problem of meaning in primitive languages
Malinowski, B. (1967) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 1,135
Cited by
Interjections as pragmatic markers
Norrick, N. R. (2009) · Journal of Pragmatics · doi:10.1016/j.pragma.2008.08.005 · Cited by 298
Non-lexical conversational sounds in American English
Ward, N. (2006) · Pragmatics & Cognition · doi:10.1075/pc.14.1.08war · Cited by 170
McCarthy, M. (2010) · English Profile Journal · doi:10.1017/s2041536210000012 · Cited by 129
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- McCarthy, M.
- Venue
- Research on Language & Social Interaction
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2003-01
- Volume
- 36
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 33-63
- ISSN
- 0835-1813 (ISSN-L)
- 1532-7973
- OpenAlex
- W1990792574
- Cited by
- 393
- References
- 39
- FWCI
- 26.59
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Talking Back: "Small" Interactional Response Tokens in Everyday Conversation. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1207/s15327973rlsi3601_3
- The paper
- McCarthy, M. (2003). Talking Back: "Small" Interactional Response Tokens in Everyday Conversation. Research on Language & Social Interaction. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327973rlsi3601_3
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.