Cited by 461Infant Development and Preterm CareNeonatal and fetal brain pathologyCerebral Palsy and Movement Disorders

The qualitative assessment of general movements in preterm, term and young infants — review of the methodology

Einspieler, Christa, Prechtl, Heinz F.R., Ferrari, Fabrizio, Cioni, Giovanni, Bos, Arend F.·1997·Early Human Development

Abstract

We describe the state of the art of Prechtl's method for the qualitative assessment of general movements as a diagnostic tool for early detection of brain dysfunction. After discussing the optimal technique for video recording general movements in preterm, term and young infants, attention is focused on the proper analysis of this spontaneous motor pattern. Recently, a group of active researchers in the field reached consensus on the various qualities of normal and abnormal general movements. These definitions are reported here in full. Since it is a newly introduced method careful investigation into its reliability is required. Various groups of investigators have obtained data which demonstrate the robust character of the method (interscorer agreement: 78-98%). Finally, we discuss the validity of this early assessment method on the basis of the reports published so far. While the method's sensitivity is similar in all age groups studied (preterm, term, first month, second month, and third month age epochs), and averages 94.5%, the specificity of the method is age-dependent. It is low during the early ages, increases gradually and reaches 82 to 100% at 3 months post-term. This phenomenon is explained by spontaneous recovery of early dysfunction. In contrast, consistent abnormalities of general movements are linked to neurological deficits found at the 2 year follow-up.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0378-3782(97)00092-3

Cites

24 of 24 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Recent international protocols recommend additional evaluations for at-risk infants early in life, including visual observations of the infant's general movements (GM) by an expert clinician throughout the preterm and term phase.

    “Recent international protocols recommend additional evaluations for at-risk infants early in life, including visual observations of the infant’s general movements (GM) by an expert clinician throughout the preterm and term phase (2, 4, 10).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Einspieler, C., Prechtl, H. F. R., Ferrari, F., Cioni, G., & Bos, A. F.
Affiliations
  • University of Graz (AT)
  • Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Modena (IT)
  • University of Pisa (IT)
  • University Medical Center Groningen (NL)
Corresponding author
Einspieler, Christa
Venue
Early Human Development
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1997-11
Volume
50
Issue
1
Pages
47-60
ISSN
0378-3782 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2038026546
Cited by
461
References
24
Citations by year
2026: 18 · 2025: 27 · 2024: 44 · 2023: 43 · 2022: 31 · 2021: 43 · 2020: 32 · 2019: 20 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 16 · 2016: 20 · 2015: 17 · 2014: 16 · 2013: 12 · 2012: 9
FWCI
3.02
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Early Human Development (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • University of Groningen research database (University of Groningen / Centre for Information Technology) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Infant Development and Preterm Care
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Neonatal and fetal brain pathology
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Cerebral Palsy and Movement Disorders
Keywords
General Movements Assessment, preterm infants, term infants, sensitivity and specificity
MeSH terms
Brain Diseases, Child, Preschool, Female, Fetal Movement, Fetus, Humans, Infant, Infant, Newborn, Neurologic Examination, Pregnancy, Video Recording, Reproducibility of Results, Ultrasonography, Prenatal, Infant Behavior

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review