The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Comparison of the free radical-scavenging activity of propolis from several regions of Argentina
Open accessOverview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Advances in the analysis of phenolic compounds in products derived from bees
Gómez-Caravaca, A. M., Gómez-Romero, M., Arráez-Román, D., Segura-Carretero, A., & Fernández-Gutiérrez, A. (2006) · Journal of Pharmaceutical and Biomedical Analysis · doi:10.1016/j.jpba.2006.03.002 · Cited by 441
Yang, S.-A., Jeon, S.-K., Lee, E.-J., Shim, C.-H., & Lee, I.-S. (2010) · Natural Product Research · doi:10.1080/14786410802496598 · Cited by 204
Propolis Inhibits UVA-Induced Apoptosis of Human Keratinocyte HaCaT Cells by Scavenging ROS
Kim, H. B., & Yoo, B. S. (2016) · Toxicological Research · doi:10.5487/tr.2016.32.4.345 · Cited by 42
Comparison of characteristics in commercial fermented vinegars made with different ingredients
Na, H. S., Choi, G. C., Yang, S. I., Lee, J. H., Cho, J. Y., Ma, S. J., & Kim, J. Y. (2013) · Korean Journal of Food Preservation · doi:10.11002/kjfp.2013.20.4.482 · Cited by 25
Metadata
- Authors
- Moreno, M. I. N., Isla, M. I., Sampietro, A. R., & Vattuone, M. A.
- Venue
- Journal of Ethnopharmacology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2000-07
- Volume
- 71
- Issue
- 1-2
- Pages
- 109-114
- ISSN
- 0378-8741 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2055602611
- Cited by
- 1,040
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 5.96
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Comparison of the free radical-scavenging activity of propolis from several regions of Argentina. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/s0378-8741(99)00189-0
- The paper
- Moreno, M. I. N., Isla, M. I., Sampietro, A. R., & Vattuone, M. A. (2000). Comparison of the free radical-scavenging activity of propolis from several regions of Argentina. Journal of Ethnopharmacology. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0378-8741(99)00189-0
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
