Cosmological Time in (2+1) - Gravity
Open accessAbstract
Abstract We consider maximal globally hyperbolic flat (2+1)-spacetimes with compact space S of genus g>1. For any spacetime M of this type, the length of time that the events have been in existence is M defines a global time, called the cosmological time CT of M, which reveals deep intrinsic properties of spacetime. In particular, the past/future asymptotic states of the cosmological time recover and decouple the linear and the translational parts of the ISO(2,1)-valued holonomy of the flat spacetime. The initial singularity can be interpreted as an isometric action of the fundamental group of S on a suitable real tree. The initial singularity faithfully manifests itself as a lack of smoothness of the embedding of the CT level surfaces into the spacetime M. The cosmological time determines a real analytic curve in the Teichmuller space of Riemann surfaces of genus g, which connects an interior point (associated to the linear part of the holonomy) with a point on Thurston's natural boundary (associated to the initial singularity).
AI snapshot
Written from the paper’s full text.
TL;DR
The paper shows that maximal globally hyperbolic, matter-free flat (2+1) spacetimes with compact space of genus \(g>1\) have a regular cosmological time whose level surfaces and asymptotic states encode the spacetime’s holonomy and initial singularity. It interprets the initial singularity as a real tree quotient and relates the cosmological time to a real analytic curve in Teichmüller space ending on Thurston’s natural boundary.
Key findings
- For these spacetimes, the cosmological time \(\tau:M\to(0,\infty[\) is surjective and regular, defines a global time, and each level surface \(S_a\) is a future Cauchy surface; the level surfaces lift to \(\tilde S_a\) with \(S_a=\tilde S_a/\pi_1(S)\).
- The initial singularity is described by a unique past-directed timelike geodesic arc from each \(p\in U(M)\) to \(\partial U(M)\); the union \(T\) of endpoints is an \(\mathbb R\)-tree with a natural isometric \(\pi_1(S)\)-action, and the quotient \(i(M)=T/\pi_1(S)\) is the initial singularity. For simplicial-type spacetimes, \(T\) is a simplicial real tree.
- The CT level surfaces are in general only \(C^1\)-embedded into \(M\), not \(C^2\); the lack of smoothness occurs on a geodesic lamination \(L_a\) of \(S_a\). Components of \(\tilde S_a\setminus\tilde L_a\) are either isometric to open sets of \(I(a)\) or are flat bands projecting to annuli; flat annuli occur only if the maximal multi-curve sublamination \(L\) is nonempty.
- The CT asymptotic states recover and decouple the linear and translational parts of the \(ISO(2,1)\)-valued holonomy. The CT determines a real analytic curve \(\gamma_M:(0,\infty[\to T_g\) connecting \(F\in T_g\) to a point \([T]\in\partial T_g\) on Thurston’s natural boundary; the paper also states a conjecture that the CMC time has the same asymptotic states as the CT.
Methods
- Theoretical study of maximal globally hyperbolic, matter-free (2+1)-spacetimes \(M\) of topological type \(S\times\mathbb R\), where \(S\) is a compact closed oriented surface of genus \(g>1\), with vanishing cosmological constant so \(M\) is flat; spacetimes are assumed time-oriented and future expanding.
- Uses the cosmological time function \(\tau(q)=\sup L(c)\) over past-directed causal curves from \(q\), regular CT theory, Minkowskian suspensions \(M(F)=I^+(0)/\Gamma\), deformed spacetimes \(U(M)/\Gamma'\) with holonomy \(\Gamma'=\Gamma+t(\Gamma)\), and simplicial-type deformations governed by weighted multi-curves.
- Analyzes the geometry via Lorentzian causality, convex domains in Minkowski space, real trees, geodesic laminations, measured geodesic laminations, marked spectra, Teichmüller space, and Thurston’s natural compactification, relying on results of Mess, Thurston, Morgan–Shalen, and Otal.
Limitations
- The paper states that proofs are postponed to a commentary with references to existing literature, that the CMC-time comparison is a conjecture, and that some figures are “just evocative” and not geometrically exact.
- The main results assume matter-free, future-expanding flat spacetimes with compact space of genus \(g>1\); the toric case \(g=1\) and negative cosmological constant are treated only as complements.
- The text makes evident that the work is theoretical and relies on prior results rather than presenting independent empirical data or numerical experiments.
Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
0 of 37 cited sources checked · 0 supported · 0 flagged
- Findingnone given§ 3.3 Spacetimes of simplicial type · p. 6
The initial singularity of U(M0) is the segment J0 = {x1=x3=0, 0≤x2≤r}.
“The initial singularity of U ( M 0 ) is the segment J 0 = { x 1 = x 3 = 0 0 ≤ x 2 ≤ r } .”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingreasoning§ Abstract · p. 1
For any maximal globally hyperbolic flat (2+1)-spacetime M with compact space S of genus g>1, the cosmological time CT is a global time on M.
“For any spacetime M of this type, the length of time that the events have been in existence is M defines a global time, called the cosmological time CT of M , which reveals deep intrinsic properties of spacetime.”
- Also stated in: § 4 The cosmological time of (2+1)-spacetimes · p. 9 · plain
“The cosmological time function, τ : M → (0 , ∞ [ , is surjective and regular, so that it defines a global time on M .”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- The authors state this as an assumption: The space is future expanding.
- The authors state this as an assumption: The maximal hyperbolic flat spacetimes considered are time-oriented and their orientations locally agree with the usual ones on M2+1.
- Also stated in: § 4 The cosmological time of (2+1)-spacetimes · p. 9 · plain
- Findingnone given§ 3.3 Spacetimes of simplicial type · p. 6
In the elementary deformation M0, the CT level surfaces S~_a of U(M0) are only C^1-embedded into U(M0).
“The surfaces ˜ S a are only C 1 -embedded into U ( M 0 ).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingreasoning§ 4.1 Initial singularity - external view · p. 10
When M is of simplicial type, the corresponding real tree T is actually a simplicial real tree.
“When M is of simplicial type, the corresponding real tree T is actually a simplicial real tree.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingnone given§ 5.2 Spacetime with negative cosmological constant · p. 19
The asymptotic state for t→-π/2, i.e. the initial singularity of D(M), is equal to the initial singularity of M.
“The asymptotic state for t →-π/ 2 (i.e. the initial singularity) is equal to the initial singularity of M .”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
- Findingnone given§ 4.5 CT asymptotic states · p. 16
ST(S) is dense in GT(S) in the induced topology by (R≥0)^C.
“Proposition 4.23 ST ( S ) is dense in GT ( S ) in the induced topology by ( R ≥ 0 ) C .”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingnone given§ 5.2 Spacetime with negative cosmological constant · p. 19
The future asymptotic states of M and M^- glue at the level surface {t=0} of the CT where expansion ends and collapse begins.
“The future asymptotic states of M and M -'glue' at the level surface { t = 0 } of the CT where the expansion ends and the collapse begins.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingreasoning§ 4.1 Initial singularity - external view · p. 9
There is a natural isometric action of the fundamental group π1(S) on T.
“There is a natural isometric action of the fundamental group π 1 ( S ) on T .”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingnone given§ 4.1 Initial singularity - external view · p. 9
The other end-point i(p) of a(p) belongs to the boundary ∂U(M) of U(M) in M2+1.
“The other end-point of a ( p ) , denoted by i ( p ) , belongs to the boundary ∂U ( M ) of U ( M ) in M 2+1 .”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingreasoning§ 4 The cosmological time of (2+1)-spacetimes · p. 9
Each S~_a (S_a) is a future Cauchy surface.
“Each ˜ S a ( S a ) is a future Cauchy surface.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingnone given§ Proposition 4.10 For every a ∈ (0 , ∞ [ : · p. 13
F is the disjoint union of two sublaminations, where L is the maximal multi-curve sublamination of F; either L or F' may be empty.
“2) F is the disjoint union of two sublaminations”
- Also stated in: § Proposition 4.10 For every a ∈ (0 , ∞ [ : · p. 13 · hedged
“where L is the maximal multi-curve sublamination of F . Note that either L or F ′ may be empty.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Also stated in: § Proposition 4.10 For every a ∈ (0 , ∞ [ : · p. 13 · hedged
- Findingnone given§ 4.1 Initial singularity - external view · p. 9
Each segment of T is a rectifiable space-like curve in ∂U(M) with its own length.
“More precisely, each segment of T is a rectifiable space-like curve in ∂U ( M ) with its own length.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingreasoning§ 4 The cosmological time of (2+1)-spacetimes · p. 9
Each level surface S~_a of U(M) maps onto S_a of M and is its universal covering.
“Each level surface ˜ S a of U ( M ) maps onto S a of M and is its universal covering.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingnone given§ Proposition 4.10 For every a ∈ (0 , ∞ [ : · p. 12
If M is the spacetime of simplicial type corresponding to the weighted multi-curve L on F, then L_a is made by the boundary components of the flat annular components embedded into S_a associated to the components of L.
“If M is the spacetime of simplicial type which corresponds to the weighted multi-curve L on the surface F , then L a is just made by the boundary components of the flat annular components embedded into S a , which are associated to the components of L .”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingnone given§ 4.3 CT duality · p. 13
If L is non empty, extending L_a to L'_a by foliating the flat annular regions of S_a by closed geodesics parallel to the boundary components, the map p_a sends L'_a onto a F.
“The above map p a sends L ′ a onto a F .”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingnone given§ 4.1 Initial singularity - external view · p. 9
The union of the initial points T = {i(p); p∈U(M)} is an R-tree.
“The union of the initial points T = { i ( p ); p ∈ U ( M ) } is an R -tree.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingcitation§ 5.1 Toric space ( g = 1 ) · p. 18
Each non static toric spacetime determines a curve γ: (0,∞) → T*_1, γ(a)=(w(a),ω(a)), where T*_1 is the cotangent bundle of the Teichmüller space T_1 of conformal structures on the torus up to isomorphism isotopic to the identity.
“Each non static spacetime determines a curve γ : (0 , ∞ [ → T ∗ 1 , γ ( a ) = ( w ( a ) , ω ( a )), where T ∗ 1 is the cotangent bundle of the Teichm¨ uller space T 1 of conformal structures on the torus up to isomorphism isotopic to the identity.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [B-G]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Findingnone given§ 3.3 Spacetimes of simplicial type · p. 9
The same conclusion holds if F is of finite area.
“The same conclusion holds if F is of finite area.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingreasoning§ 4.1 Initial singularity - external view · p. 10
In the simplicial case, the set of edges of T consists of the union of the space-like segments which form the initial singularity of the different tiles of the form B(σ,vσ,r)+t(Rσ).
“In this case, the set of edges of T consists of the union of the space-like segments which form the initial singularity of the different tiles of the form B ( σ, v σ , r ) + t ( R σ ) (see section 3).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingnone given§ 4.3 CT duality · p. 14
One can invert the above construction and associate to each measured geodesic lamination (F,μ) of the hyperbolic surface F a suitable geometric R-tree.
“One can invert the above construction and associate to each measured geodesic lamination ( F , µ ) of the hyperbolic surface F a suitable geometric R -tree.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingreasoning§ Proposition 4.10 For every a ∈ (0 , ∞ [ : · p. 13
Each component of W_a tilde is either isometric to an open set of I(a) or is a flat band which embeds into I(1,3,a), and projects onto an annulus of S_a.
“Each component of ˜ W a is either isometric to an open set of I ( a ) or is a flat band which embeds into I (1 , 3 , a ) , and projects onto an annulus of S a .”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingreasoning§ 3.3 Spacetimes of simplicial type · p. 7
S_a can be obtained by cutting F0 along c and by inserting an annulus of depth r.
“As shown in figure 4, S a can be obtained by cutting F 0 along c and by inserting a annulus of depth r .”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingreasoning§ 5.1 Toric space ( g = 1 ) · p. 18
The projection of γ onto T_1 is a complete geodesic connecting two boundary points.
“In particular the projection of γ onto T 1 is a complete geodesic connecting two boundary points.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingreasoning§ 4.1 Initial singularity - external view · p. 10
A homeomorphic (not isometric) copy of T can easily be embedded into I(1).
“A homeomorphic (not isometric) copy of T can easily be embedded into I (1).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingnone given§ 4.5 CT asymptotic states · p. 17
For every a in (0,∞), l_{S_a}/a belongs to T_g ⊂ (R≥0)^C.
“Proposition 4.27 For every a ∈ (0 , ∞ [ , l S a /a belongs to T g ∈ ( R ≥ 0 ) C .”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingreasoning§ 3.3 Spacetimes of simplicial type · p. 8
When F is compact, every region R is bounded by infinitely many lines of L~.
“When F is compact, every region R (defined above) is bounded by infinitely many lines of ˜ L .”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingnone given§ Proposition 4.10 For every a ∈ (0 , ∞ [ : · p. 12
For every a in (0,∞), S_a tilde is only C1-embedded into U(M), so it carries an induced C1-Riemannian metric.
“2) ˜ S a is only C 1 -embedded into U ( M ) , so that it carries an induced C 1 -Riemannian metric.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingnone given§ Proposition 4.10 For every a ∈ (0 , ∞ [ : · p. 13
There exists a geodesic lamination F on F=I(1)/Γ, lifting to F tilde on I(1), such that for every a, p_a(L_a tilde)=a F tilde and any leaf of L_a tilde is isometrically mapped onto a leaf of a F tilde.
“1) There exists a geodesic lamination F on F = I (1) / Γ , which lifts to a geodesic lamination ˜ F on I (1) , such that, for every a , one has p a ( ˜ L a ) = a ˜ F and any leaf of ˜ L a is isometrically mapped onto a leaf of a ˜ F .”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingreasoning§ 4.1 Initial singularity - external view · p. 10
All the vertices of T are of infinite valence.
“Note that, as demonstrated in remark 3.4, all the vertices of T are of infinite valence.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingnone given§ Proposition 4.10 For every a ∈ (0 , ∞ [ : · p. 12
For every a in (0,∞), the locus L_a tilde at which the embedding of S_a tilde into U(M) is no longer C2 is a geodesic lamination of S_a tilde.
“3) The locus ˜ L a at which the embedding of ˜ S a into U ( M ) is no longer C 2 is a geodesic lamination of ˜ S a .”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingcitation§ 4.5 CT asymptotic states · p. 16
∆: MGL(F) → GT(S) is a bijection, that is it can be naturally inverted.
“Proposition 4.19 ∆ : MGL ( F ) → GT ( S ) is a bijection, that is it can be naturally inverted.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [O]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Findingnone given§ 5.2 Spacetime with negative cosmological constant · p. 19
The final singularity of D(M), t→π/2, coincides with the initial singularity of M^-.
“The final singularity ( t → π/ 2) coincides with the initial singularity of M -.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingcitation§ 4.5 CT asymptotic states · p. 16
T_g and the image Im(I) are disjoint subsets of (R≥0)^C.
“Moreover T g and the image Im(I) are disjoint subsets of ( R ≥ 0 ) C”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [O]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Findingcitation§ 5.1 Toric space ( g = 1 ) · p. 18
For the toric case, γ is the complete orbit of the Teichmüller flow with initial data (w(1),ω(1)).
“It is not hard to verify that γ is just the complete orbit of the Teichm¨ uller flow with initial data ( w (1) , ω (1)) (see [Ab],[B-G]).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [Ab]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites [B-G]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Findingcitation§ 4.6 A commentary on the proofs · p. 18
The Fenchel-Nielsen flow generalizes to the earthquake flow with initial data (F,F), which has real analytic orbits.
“Concerning proposition 4.27, the Fenchel-Nielsen flow generalizes to the earthquake flow (one uses again the density 4.23) with initial data ( F, F ) which has real analytic orbits [Ke2].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [Ke2]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Findingnone given§ Proposition 4.10 For every a ∈ (0 , ∞ [ : · p. 12
L_a tilde is the pull-back of a geodesic lamination L_a of S_a.
“˜ L a is in fact the pull-back of a geodesic lamination L a of S a .”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingcitation§ 4.5 CT asymptotic states · p. 18
For a spacetime of simplicial type, the curve in T_g is given by the Fenchel-Nielsen flow obtained by twisting the hyperbolic surface F along the closed geodesic of the multi-curve.
“Concerning proposition 4.27, in the special case of a spacetime of simplicial type, the curve in T g is just given by the Fenchel-Nielsen flow obtained by 'twisting' the hyperbolic surface F along the closed geodesic of the multi-curve (see [T3] and also [B-P]).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [T3]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites [B-P]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Findingnone given§ 4 The cosmological time of (2+1)-spacetimes · p. 9
The cosmological time lifts to a regular cosmological time on the covering, τ~ : U(M) → (0,∞[.
“It lifts to a regular cosmological time on the covering, ˜ τ : U ( M ) → (0 , ∞ [ .”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingnone given§ 3.3 Spacetimes of simplicial type · p. 8
Starting from any locally finite family of weighted geodesic lines in I(1), the simplicial deformation produces a globally hyperbolic spacetime structure on R^2×R with a regular cosmological time.
“Similarly, by starting from any locally finite family of weighted geodesic lines in I (1), the simplicial deformation that we have just described produces a globally hyperbolic spacetime structure on R 2 × R with a regular cosmological time.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingreasoning§ Proposition 4.10 For every a ∈ (0 , ∞ [ : · p. 13
(p')^{-1}(L) ∩ S_a is the disjoint union of flat annular components of S_a, like in the case of a spacetime of simplicial type.
“so that ( p ′ ) -1 ( L ) ∩ S a is the disjoint union of flat annular components of S a , like in the case of a spacetime of simplicial type.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingreasoning§ Proposition 4.10 For every a ∈ (0 , ∞ [ : · p. 13
Flat annuli occur only if L is non empty.
“Flat annuli do occur only if L is non empty.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingnone given§ 4.1 Initial singularity - external view · p. 9
For any p∈U(M) there is a unique time-like geodesic arc a(p) contained in U(M), which starts at p and is directed in the past of p, such that the Lorentzian length of a(p) equals τ~(p).
“For any p ∈ U ( M ) ⊂ M 2+1 there is a unique time-like geodesic arc a ( p ) contained in U ( M ) , which starts at p and is directed in the past of p , such that the Lorentzian length of a ( p ) equals ˜ τ ( p ) .”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingnone given§ 4.1 Initial singularity - external view · p. 9
If p and q are identified in M by the action of π1(S), so are a(p) and a(q).
“If p and q are identified in M by the action of π 1 ( S ) , so are a ( p ) and a ( q ) .”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingnone given§ Proposition 4.10 For every a ∈ (0 , ∞ [ : · p. 13
The set p^{-1}(L hat) is the union of components of the type B(σ, v_σ, r)+w.
“3) The set p -1 ( ̂ L ) is the union of components of the type B ( σ, v σ , r ) + w ,”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingreasoning§ 4.5 CT asymptotic states · p. 17
The cosmological time determines a curve γ_M: (0,∞) → T_g.
“Hence, the cosmological time determines a curve γ M : (0 , ∞ [ → T g .”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingnone given§ Proposition 4.10 For every a ∈ (0 , ∞ [ : · p. 12
For every a in (0,∞), the surface S_a tilde is the graph of a positive convex function defined on the plane {x3=0} in M^{2+1}.
“1) ˜ S a is the graph of a positive convex function defined on the plane { x 3 = 0 } in M 2+1 .”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingcitation§ 4.5 CT asymptotic states · p. 16
For each r > 0, ∆(r F) = r ∆(F), taking either the r-multiple of the measure or the r-multiple of the distance; ∆ respects the positive rays.
“For each r > 0 , ∆( r F ) = r ∆( F ; here we take either the r -multiple of the measure or the r -multiple of the distance. We can shortly say that ' ∆ respects the positive rays'.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [O]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Findingnone given§ 5.2 Spacetime with negative cosmological constant · p. 19
The orbit of D(M) in T_g is the union of two earthquake rays associated to M, pointing to the future, and to M^-, towards the past.
“The orbit of D ( M ) in T g is given by the union of two earthquake rays associated to M (pointing to the future) and to M -(towards the past); note that the qualitative behaviour is similar to what we have remarked for g = 1.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingreasoning§ Proposition 4.10 For every a ∈ (0 , ∞ [ : · p. 13
The union of p_a(L_a tilde) over a covers the suspension F hat of F tilde.
“That is, the union of p a ( ˜ L a ) 's covers the suspension ̂ F of ˜ F .”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation§ 1 Introduction. · p. 1
The (2+1)-dimensional Einstein equation with vanishing cosmological constant implies that M is Riemann flat.
“The (2+1)-dimensional Einstein equation with vanishing cosmological constant actually implies that M is (Riemann) flat.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [D-J-'t H]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites [W]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Interpretationnone given§ Abstract · p. 1
The initial singularity can be interpreted as an isometric action of the fundamental group of S on a suitable real tree.
“The initial singularity can be interpreted as an isometric action of the fundamental group of S on a suitable real tree.”
- Also stated in: § 1 Introduction. · p. 2 · plain
“The initial singularity can be interpreted as the isometric action of the fundamental group of S on a suitable 'real tree'.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Also stated in: § 1 Introduction. · p. 2 · plain
- Interpretationreasoning§ 1 Introduction. · p. 2
The initial singularity admits two complementary descriptions: one in terms of real trees and the second in terms of geodesic laminations.
“Thus the initial singularity admits two complementary descriptions: one, in terms of real trees and, the second, in terms of geodesic laminations.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning§ 1 Introduction. · p. 2
The lack of smoothness of the CT level surfaces takes place on a geodesic lamination on S_a and is an observable large scale manifestation of the intrinsic geometry of the initial singularity.
“This lack of smoothness takes place on a 'geodesic lamination' on S a and is a observable large scale manifestation of the intrinsic geometry of the initial singularity.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationreasoning§ 2 The Cosmological Time Function. · p. 3
When the cosmological time is regular, the τ-constant level surfaces and their properties have a direct physical meaning as they are observables.
“Thus, when the cosmological time is regular, the τ -constant level surfaces and their properties have a direct physical meaning as they are observables.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationnone given§ Abstract · p. 1
The initial singularity faithfully manifests itself as a lack of smoothness of the embedding of the CT level surfaces into the spacetime M.
“The initial singularity faithfully manifests itself as a lack of smoothness of the embedding of the CT level surfaces into the spacetime M .”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationnone given§ Abstract · p. 1
The past/future asymptotic states of the cosmological time recover and decouple the linear and translational parts of the ISO(2,1)-valued holonomy of the flat spacetime.
“In particular, the past/future asymptotic states of the cosmological time recover and decouple the linear and the translational parts of the ISO (2 , 1)-valued holonomy of the flat spacetime.”
- Also stated in: § 1 Introduction. · p. 2 · boosted
“Remarkably, they recover and decouple the linear and the translational parts of the holonomy.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Also stated in: § 1 Introduction. · p. 2 · boosted
- Premisenone given§ 3.2 (2+1) spacetimes as deformed Minkowskian suspensions · p. 5
Each element γ'∈Γ' is of the form γ' = γ + t(γ), where γ∈Γ and t(γ)∈R^3 is a translation; t:Γ→R^3 is a cocycle representing an element of H^1(Γ,R^3).
“Each element γ ′ ∈ Γ ′ is of the form γ ′ = γ + t ( γ ), where γ ∈ Γ and t ( γ ) ∈ R 3 is a translation. t : Γ → R 3 is a cocycle representing an element of H 1 (Γ , R 3 ).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning§ Abstract · p. 1
The cosmological time determines a real analytic curve in the Teichmüller space of Riemann surfaces of genus g, which connects an interior point (associated to the linear part of the holonomy) with a point on Thurston's natural boundary (associated to the initial singularity).
“The cosmological time determines a real analytic curve in the Teichm¨ uller space of Riemann surfaces of genus g , which connects an interior point (associated to the linear part of the holonomy) with a point on Thurston's natural boundary (associated to the initial singularity).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation§ 3.2 (2+1) spacetimes as deformed Minkowskian suspensions · p. 5
Any maximal globally hyperbolic, future expanding flat spacetime M with compact space homeomorphic to S can be regarded as a deformation of some Minkowskian suspension.
“It has been shown in [Me] that any maximal globally hyperbolic, future expanding flat spacetime M with compact space homeomorphic to S , as above, can be regarded as a 'deformation' of some Minkowskian suspension (see also [W]).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [Me]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites [W]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Premisecitation§ 2 The Cosmological Time Function. · p. 3
When τ is regular, for each q∈N there exists a future-directed time-like unit speed geodesic ray γ_q : (0, τ(q)] → N such that its Lorentzian length equals τ(q).
“For each q ∈ N there exists a future-directed time-like unit speed geodesic ray γ q : (0 , τ ( q )] → N such that:”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [A-G-H]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Interpretationnone given§ 5.3 CT versus CMC · p. 19
The asymptotic states of the cosmological time are intrinsic features of the spacetime.
“On the other hand, we have seen that the asymptotic states of the cosmological time are intrinsic features of the spacetime.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation§ 5.3 CT versus CMC · p. 20
By [A-M-T], ρ is a global time function with image the interval (0,+∞).
“(1) ρ is a global time function with image the interval (0 , + ∞ ).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [A-M-T]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Interpretationnone given§ 5.3 CT versus CMC · p. 19
Given any global time on a spacetime M=U(M)/Γ', the asymptotic behaviour of the geometry of the corresponding level surfaces reflects in general a property of the specific time and not of the spacetime.
“Given any global time on a spacetime M = U ( M ) / Γ ′ , the asymptotic behaviour of the geometry of the corresponding level surfaces reflects in general a property of the specific time and not of the spacetime.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisecitation§ 4.5 CT asymptotic states · p. 16
The natural action on T_g of the mapping class group Mod_g of S extends to an action on the compactification T_g bar.
“The natural action on T g of the mapping class group Mod g of S extends to an action on the compactification ¯ T g .”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites [T3]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites [B-P]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites [F-L-P]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Premisecitation§ 4.1 Initial singularity - external view · p. 10
The R-trees and the associated π1(S)-actions which occur in proposition 4.4 are not arbitrary.
“The R -trees and the associated π 1 ( S )-actions which occur in proposition 4.4 are not arbitrary (see [O] pag. 32).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [O]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Interpretationreasoning§ 4.1 Initial singularity - external view · p. 9
The quotient space i(M) = T/π1(S) can be thought as the initial singularity of M.
“The quotient space i ( M ) = T /π 1 ( S ) can be thought as the initial singularity of M .”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation§ 4.5 CT asymptotic states · p. 16
The pair (T_g ∪ P+(Im(I)), P+(Im(I))) is homeomorphic to the pair (closed B^{6g-6}, S^{6g-7}).
“Proposition 4.22 The pair ( ¯ T g , ∂ ¯ T g ) = ( T g ∪ P + ( Im ( I )) , P + ( Im ( I ))) is homeomorphic to the pair ( ¯ B 6 g -6 , S 6 g -7 ) , where ¯ B 6 g -6 is the closed ball and S 6 g -7 is its boundary sphere.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites [T3]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites [B-P]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites [F-L-P]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Interpretationnone given§ 4.5 CT asymptotic states · p. 17
The dual effect of the initial singularity on the embedding of S_a into M is, in principle, observable for any finite value a of the CT.
“Nevertheless this effect is, in principle, observable for any finite value a of the CT.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisecitation§ 5.3 CT versus CMC · p. 20
By [A-M-T], if γ: (0,∞) → T_g is any ρ-orbit in T_g, then γ is proper, that is it goes out from any compact set of T_g.
“(ii) γ is proper, that is it goes out from any compact set of T g , roughly it 'goes to ∞ '.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [A-M-T]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Premisecitation§ 5.3 CT versus CMC · p. 20
By [A-M-T], if γ: (0,∞) → T_g is any ρ-orbit in T_g, then lim_{ρ→0} γ exists in T_g.
“(i) The lim ρ → 0 γ exists in T g .”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [A-M-T]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- May combine two claims. 24
- Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 13
May combine two claims.
Findingnone given§ 3.3 Spacetimes of simplicial type · p. 7The CT of the covering U(M0) passes to the quotient M0 = U(M0)/π1; each level surface S_a is only C^1-embedded into M0, so that it is endowed with an induced C^1-Riemannian metric.
“The CT of the covering U ( M 0 ) passes to the quotient M 0 = U ( M 0 ) /π 1 ; each level surface S a is only C 1 -embedded into M 0 , so that it is endowed with an induced C 1 -Riemannian metric.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Findingnone given§ 1 Introduction. · p. 2The level surfaces S_a of the CT are in general only C^1-embedded into the spacetime M.
“Differently to the case of the CMC time (for instance), the level surfaces S a of the CT are in general only C 1 -embedded into the spacetime M .”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingcitation§ 3.3 Spacetimes of simplicial type · p. 5Spacetimes of simplicial type are 'dense' in the set of all spacetimes; the shape of any spacetime and of its CT can be arbitrarily well approximated by some spacetime of simplicial type.
“Spacetimes of simplicial type are important because they are 'dense' in the set of all spacetimes; the shape of any spacetime and of its CT can be arbitrarily well approximated by some spacetime of simplicial type (see proposition 4.23).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites proposition 4.23
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
May combine two claims.
Findingnone given§ 2 The Cosmological Time Function. · p. 4Any maximal globally hyperbolic, matter-free (2+1)-spacetime M with compact space S actually has regular cosmological time, and its initial singularity can be accurately described.
“We are going to show that any maximal globally hyperbolic, matter-free (2+1)-spacetime M , with compact space S , actually has regular cosmological time, and its initial singularity can be accurately described.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- The authors state this as an assumption: The space is future expanding.
- The authors state this as an assumption: The maximal hyperbolic flat spacetimes considered are time-oriented and their orientations locally agree with the usual ones on M2+1.
May combine two claims.
Findingnone given§ 1 Introduction. · p. 2The cosmological time τ is invariant under diffeomorphisms, so the τ=a level surfaces S_a provide a gauge-invariant description of space evolution in M.
“The cosmological time τ is invariant under diffeomorphisms, therefore the τ = a level surfaces S a provide a gauge-invariant description of space evolution in M .”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based). May combine two claims.
Findingnone given§ 2 The Cosmological Time Function. · p. 3The cosmological time function is not related to any specific choice of coordinates in N; it is gauge-invariant and represents an intrinsic feature of spacetime.
“The cosmological time function is not related to any specific choice of coordinates in N ; it is 'gauge-invariant' and so it represents an intrinsic feature of spacetime.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingnone given§ 5.2 Spacetime with negative cosmological constant · p. 19D(M) is locally anti de Sitter; up to a translation, t gives the CT.
“D ( M ) is locally anti de Sitter; up to a translation, t gives the CT.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingreasoning§ 5.2 Spacetime with negative cosmological constant · p. 19For anti-de Sitter suspensions, up to a translation the function t gives the CT and it has both an initial and a final singularity, both reduced to one point.
“Up to a translation, the function t gives the CT and it has many qualitative properties similar to the CT of the Minkowskian suspensions, but we have now both an initial and a final singularity, both reduced to one point.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingreasoning§ 5.1 Toric space ( g = 1 ) · p. 18For the toric case, lim_{a→∞} l_{S_a}/a = I_H and lim_{a→0} l_{S_a} = I_V.
“Then: lim a →∞ l S a /a = I H and lim a → 0 l S a = I V .”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Findingnone given§ 3.3 Spacetimes of simplicial type · p. 8The construction of M(F) and of M(F,L) can be performed for any hyperbolic surface F, not necessarily compact nor of finite area.
“The construction of M ( F ) and of M ( F, L ) can be performed for any hyperbolic surface F , not necessarily compact nor of finite area.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingreasoning§ 4.5 CT asymptotic states · p. 16The image of I in (R≥0)^C is a positive cone based on the origin and positive rays go onto positive rays.
“The image in ( R ≥ 0 ) C is a positive cone based on the origin and positive rays go onto positive rays, in a obvious sense.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [O]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
May combine two claims.
Findingnone given§ Proposition 4.10 For every a ∈ (0 , ∞ [ : · p. 12For every a in (0,∞), S_a tilde is geodesically complete and for each p ≠ q in S_a tilde there is a unique geodesic arc connecting p and q.
“˜ S a is geodesically complete and for each p = q ∈ ˜ S a , there is a unique geodesic arc connecting p and q .”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingreasoning§ 4.3 CT duality · p. 14For an arc J in I(1) transverse to the leaves of F tilde, the map p_a lifts J to an arc J' in S_a tilde transverse to the leaves of L'_a tilde, and the distance d on T lifts to a measure μ_J' tilde on J' which gives the required π1-equivariant transverse measure on F.
“On the other hand, by means of the map i a , the distance d on T lifts to a measure ˜ µ J ′ on J ′ which finally gives us the required ( π 1 -equivariant) transverse measure on F .”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).
Findingnone given§ 4.5 CT asymptotic states · p. 18For a spacetime of simplicial type, the depth of the annular regions is constant on each S_a.
“To prove proposition 4.25 in this case, one has to note that the depth of the annular regions is constant on each S a .”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingcitation§ 4.5 CT asymptotic states · p. 16The maps I: MGL(F)→(R≥0)^C and s: GT(S)→(R≥0)^C obtained by taking marked spectra satisfy I = s ∘ ∆ and I is injective.
“Proposition 4.20 Consider the maps, I : MGL ( F ) → ( R ≥ 0 ) C and s : GT ( S ) → ( R ≥ 0 ) C , obtained by taking the corresponding marked spectra. Then I = s ◦ ∆ and is injective.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [O]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
May combine two claims.
Findingreasoning§ 4.5 CT asymptotic states · p. 18When a → 0, the contribution to the length of any curve on S_a of the part contained in the nonannular components becomes negligible, the length of the annuli boundaries goes linearly to zero, so that only the transverse crossing of the annuli becomes dominant.
“When a → 0, the contribution (to the length of any curve on S a ) of the part contained in the nonannular components becomes negligible, the length of the annuli boundaries goes linearly to zero, so that only the transverse crossing of the annuli becomes dominant.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingreasoning§ 4 The cosmological time of (2+1)-spacetimes · p. 9The action of π1(S) on U(M) restricts to a free, properly discontinuous isometric action on S~_a such that S_a = S~_a/π1(S).
“In other words, the action of π 1 ( S ) on U ( M ) restricts to a free, properly discontinuous isometric action on ˜ S a such that S a = ˜ S a /π 1 ( S ) .”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingreasoning§ 4.5 CT asymptotic states · p. 17The curve γ_M is real analytic and connects F ∈ T_g with the point on the natural boundary [T] ∈ ∂T_g.
“This is a real analytic curve which connects F ∈ T g with the point on the natural boundary [ T ] ∈ ∂T g (here [ . ] denotes the projective class).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingnone given§ 3.3 Spacetimes of simplicial type · p. 8Each tile has its own CT; all the cosmological times fit well together and define the CT of U(M) which passes to the quotient M.
“Note that each tile has its own CT; all the cosmological times fit well together and define the CT of U ( M ) which passes to the quotient M .”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingreasoning§ 4.5 CT asymptotic states · p. 18When a → ∞, the annuli depth goes to zero because of the rescaling by 1/a, and the length spectrum converges to the spectrum of F.
“When a → ∞ , the annuli depth goes to zero because of the rescaling by 1 /a , and the length spectrum converge to the spectrum of F .”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Premisecitation§ 2 The Cosmological Time Function. · p. 3When τ is regular, τ : N → (0,∞[ is a continuous function, twice differentiable almost everywhere, giving a global time CT on N.
“In particular when τ is regular, τ : N → (0 , ∞ [ is a continuous function, which is twice differentiable almost everywhere, giving a global time on N denoted by CT.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [A-G-H]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Premisenone given§ 2 The Cosmological Time Function. · p. 2In standard flat Minkowski space M^{n+1}, the cosmological time τ is the constant ∞-valued function.
“For example, if N is the standard flat Minkowski space M n +1 , τ is the constant ∞ -valued function, so in this case it is not very interesting.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Premisecitation§ 3.2 (2+1) spacetimes as deformed Minkowskian suspensions · p. 5The linear part Γ of Γ' is a subgroup of SO+(2,1) which is isomorphic to π1(S) and acts freely and properly discontinuously on I(1)≅H2.
“The 'linear part' Γ of Γ ′ is a subgroup of SO + (2 , 1) which is isomorphic to π 1 ( S ) and acts freely and properly discontinuously on I (1) ∼ = H 2 . This is a non trivial fact which follows from a result of Goldman [Go].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [Go]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
May combine two claims.
Interpretationreasoning§ 1 Introduction. · p. 2Both the intrinsic and extrinsic geometry of the surfaces S_a, as well as their past/future asymptotic states, are intrinsic features of spacetime.
“Both the intrinsic and extrinsic geometry of the surfaces S a , as well as their past/future asymptotic states, are intrinsic features of spacetime.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).
Interpretationnone given§ 2 The Cosmological Time Function. · p. 3The union of the past asymptotic end-points of these rays can be regarded as the initial singularity of N.
“The union of the past asymptotic end-points of these rays can be regarded as the initial singularity of N .”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Premisereasoning§ 3.2 (2+1) spacetimes as deformed Minkowskian suspensions · p. 5U(M) is the universal covering of M and Γ' is isomorphic to π1(M) ≅ π1(S).
“Hence U ( M ) is the universal covering of M and Γ ′ is isomorphic to π 1 ( M ) ∼ = π 1 ( S ).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [Me]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
May combine two claims.
Premisecitation§ 2 The Cosmological Time Function. · p. 3When τ is regular, each τ level surface is a future Cauchy surface, so that N is globally hyperbolic.
“Each τ level surface is a future Cauchy surface, so that N is globally hyperbolic.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [A-G-H]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Classified as probably not a substantial claim.
Interpretationreasoning§ 4.5 CT asymptotic states · p. 18The general case follows by using the density stated in proposition 4.23.
“The general case follows by using the density stated in proposition 4.23.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Interpretationnone given§ 4.6 A commentary on the proofs · p. 18The spacetimes materialize the duality between measured geodesic laminations and real trees.
“It is an amazing fact that the spacetimes 'materialize' this subtle duality in the way we have seen.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Premisecitation§ 4.6 A commentary on the proofs · p. 18A complete proof of the duality of propositions 4.19 and 4.20 can be found in [O].
“In particular one can find in [O] a complete proof of the duality (see proposition 4.19 and proposition 4.20).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [O]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Interpretationnone given§ 4.6 A commentary on the proofs · p. 18In the spacetime setting, the choice of the base hyperbolic surface F is fixed by the linear part of the holonomy of M, that is by its future asymptotic state.
“Note also that, in the spacetime setting, the choice of the base hyperbolic surface F (see remark 4.24 4) is fixed by the linear part of the holonomy of M , that is by its future asymptotic state.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Premisecitation§ 4.6 A commentary on the proofs · p. 18The identification between cocycles of a spacetime M with measured geodesic laminations on F=I(1)/Γ is due to Mess.
“The identification between cocycles of a spacetime M with measured geodesic laminations on F = I (1) / Γ is due to Mess [Me].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [Me]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
May combine two claims.
Premisereasoning§ 4.1 Initial singularity - external view · p. 12There is no non-empty strictly sub-tree which is invariant for this action, and for each segment in the tree, the subgroup of π1(S) which keeps the segment invariant is virtually Abelian.
“This means that there is no non-empty strictly sub-tree which is invariant for this action, and that, for each segment in the tree, the subgroup of π 1 ( S ) which keeps the segment invariant is virtually Abelian.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [O]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
May combine two claims.
Interpretationnone given§ 5.2 Spacetime with negative cosmological constant · p. 19D(F) can be obtained from the Minkowskian suspension M(F) by warping and doubling; D(F) and M(F) have the same initial singularity; the future asymptotic state of M(F) becomes the level surface of the CT on D(F) where expansion ends and collapsing begins.
“In a sense, D ( F ) can be obtained by the Minkowskian suspension M ( F ) by a procedure of warping and doubling ; D ( F ) and M ( F ) have the same initial singularity; the future asymptotic state of M ( F ) 'becomes' the level surface of the CT on D ( F ) where the expansion ends and the collapsing begins.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Premisecitation§ 4.6 A commentary on the proofs · p. 18The geometric interpretation of the Morgan-Shalen convergence is due to Paulin and Bestvina.
“The geometric interpretation of the Morgan-Shalen convergence (see remark 4.24 3) is due to Paulin and Bestvina (c.f. the bibliography of [O]).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [O]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Premisecitation§ 4.6 A commentary on the proofs · p. 18The dual approach via real trees is due to Morgan-Shalen.
“The dual approach via real trees is due to Morgan-Shalen [M-S] [M-S2].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [M-S]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites [M-S2]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
The authors state this as an assumption.
The space is future expanding.
“we will always assume that the space is future expanding”
The authors state this as an assumption.
The maximal hyperbolic flat spacetimes considered are time-oriented and their orientations locally agree with the usual ones on M2+1.
“We assume that our maximal hyperbolic flat spacetimes are time-oriented and future expanding, and that these orientations locally agree with the usual ones on M 2+1 .”
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The degeneration of the spatial geometry at the initial singularity carries over to the higher genus case.
“Moreover, the degeneration of the spatial geometry at the initial singularity carries over to the higher genus case [200, 55].”
From Quantum Gravity in 2 + 1 Dimensions: The Case of a Closed Universe (2005) · cites this paper as [55]
When Λ = 0, a set of parameters describing the initial singularity and a second set describing the asymptotic future geometry together completely determine the spacetime.
“Benedetti and Guadagnini have shown that when Λ = 0, a set of parameters describing the initial singularity and a second set describing the geometry in the asymptotic future together completely determine the spacetime [55].”
From Quantum Gravity in 2 + 1 Dimensions: The Case of a Closed Universe (2005) · cites this paper as [55]
Cites
2 + 1 dimensional gravity as an exactly soluble system
Witten, E. (1988) · Nuclear Physics B · doi:10.1016/0550-3213(88)90143-5 · Cited by 2,562 · see citing works
Three dimensional manifolds, Kleinian groups and hyperbolic geometry
Thurston, W. P. H. (1982) · Bulletin of the American Mathematical Society · doi:10.1090/s0273-0979-1982-15003-0 · Cited by 1,437 · see citing works
Three-dimensional Einstein gravity: Dynamics of flat space
Deser, S., Jackiw, R., & 't Hooft, G. (1984) · Annals of Physics · doi:10.1016/0003-4916(84)90085-x · Cited by 1,222 · see citing works
On the geometry and dynamics of diffeomorphisms of surfaces
Thurston, W. P. H. (1988) · Bulletin of the American Mathematical Society · doi:10.1090/s0273-0979-1988-15685-6 · Cited by 1,072 · see citing works
Topological components of spaces of representations
Goldman, W. M. (1988) · Inventiones Mathematicae · doi:10.1007/bf01410200 · Cited by 350 · see citing works
Reduction of the Einstein equations in 2+1 dimensions to a Hamiltonian system over Teichmüller space
Moncrief, V. (1989) · Journal of Mathematical Physics · doi:10.1063/1.528475 · Cited by 202 · see citing works
The asymptotic geometry of teichmuller space
Kerckhoff, S. P. (1980) · Topology · doi:10.1016/0040-9383(80)90029-4 · Cited by 200 · see citing works
Observables, gauge invariance, and time in (2+1)-dimensional quantum gravity
Carlip, S. J. (1990) · Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology/Physical review. D. Particles and fields · doi:10.1103/physrevd.42.2647 · Cited by 95 · see citing works
On the global evolution problem in 2 + 1 gravity
Anderson, L., Moncrief, V., & Tromba, A. J. (1997) · Journal of Geometry and Physics · doi:10.1016/s0393-0440(97)87804-7 · Cited by 72 · see citing works
Kerckhoff, S. P. (1985) · Commentarii Mathematici Helvetici · doi:10.1007/bf02567397 · Cited by 63 · see citing works
Free actions of surface groups on R-trees
Morgan, J. W., & Shalen, P. B. (1991) · Topology · doi:10.1016/0040-9383(91)90002-l · Cited by 55 · see citing works
The cosmological time function
Andersson, L., Galloway, G. J., & Howard, R. (1998) · Classical and Quantum Gravity · doi:10.1088/0264-9381/15/2/006 · Cited by 50 · see citing works
On the existence of simultaneous synchronous coordinates in spacetimes with spacelike singularities
Wald, R. M., & Yip, P. F. (1981) · Journal of Mathematical Physics · doi:10.1063/1.524844 · Cited by 24 · see citing works
Geometric cone surfaces and -gravity coupled to particles
Benedetti, R., & Guadagnini, E. (2000) · Nuclear Physics B · doi:10.1016/s0550-3213(00)00484-3 · Cited by 14 · see citing works
Self-citationClassical Teichmüller theory and (2+1) gravity
Benedetti, R., & Guadagnini, E. (1998) · Physics Letters B · doi:10.1016/s0370-2693(98)01156-3 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
Self-citation(1990) · AJN American Journal of Nursing · doi:10.2307/3426298 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
(1990) · AJN American Journal of Nursing · doi:10.2307/3426176
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 5
- J.T. Beem, P.E. Ehrlich, K.L. Easley, Global Lorentzian Geometry, 2nd edn., Pure and Applied Mathematics, Vol. 202, Dekker
- Fathi, 1979, Travaux de Thurston sur les surfaces, Astérisque, 66
- S. Hawking, G.F.W. Ellis, The Large Scale Structure of Space–Time, Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge
- Morgan, 1985, Ann. Math., 122, 398
- Otal, 1996, Le théorème d'hyperbolisation pour les variétés fibrées de dimension trois, Astérisque, 235
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Quantum Gravity in 2 + 1 Dimensions: The Case of a Closed Universe
Carlip, S. (2005) · Living Reviews in Relativity · doi:10.12942/lrr-2005-1 · Cited by 172 · see citing works
Andersson, L., Barbot, T., Benedetti, R., Bonsante, F., Goldman, W. M., Labourie, F., Scannell, K. P., & Schlenker, J. (2007) · Geometriae Dedicata · doi:10.1007/s10711-007-9164-6 · Cited by 71 · see citing works
Self-citationCanonical Wick rotations in 3-dimensional gravity
Benedetti, R., & Bonsante, F. (2009) · Memoirs of the American Mathematical Society · doi:10.1090/memo/0926 · Cited by 74 · see citing works
Self-citationTHE REPRESENTATION OF TIME AND CHANGE IN MECHANICS
Belot, G. (2007) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-044451560-5/50005-1 · Cited by 68 · see citing works
Flat spacetimes with compact hyperbolic Cauchy surfaces
Bonsante, F. (2005) · Journal of Differential Geometry · doi:10.4310/jdg/1122493997 · Cited by 62 · see citing works
Globally hyperbolic flat space–times
Barbot, T. (2004) · Journal of Geometry and Physics · doi:10.1016/j.geomphys.2004.05.002 · Cited by 58 · see citing works
Barbot, T., Béguin, F., & Zeghib, A. (2011) · Annales de l’institut Fourier · doi:10.5802/aif.2622 · Cited by 54 · see citing works
Fixed points of compositions of earthquakes
Bonsante, F., & Schlenker, J. (2012) · Duke Mathematical Journal · doi:10.1215/00127094-1548434 · Cited by 41 · see citing works
Cosmological time versus CMC time in spacetimes of constant curvature
Andersson, L., Barbot, T., Béguin, F., & Zeghib, A. (2012) · Asian Journal of Mathematics · doi:10.4310/ajm.2012.v16.n1.a2 · Cited by 33 · see citing works
A cyclic extension of the earthquake flow I
Bonsante, F., Mondello, G., & Schlenker, J. (2013) · Geometry & Topology · doi:10.2140/gt.2013.17.157 · Cited by 32 · see citing works
Meusburger, C. (2007) · Communications in Mathematical Physics · doi:10.1007/s00220-007-0255-x · Cited by 28 · see citing works
On Dynamics of Brans–Dicke Theory of Gravitation
Farajollahi, H., Farhoudi, M., & Shojaie, H. (2010) · International Journal of Theoretical Physics · doi:10.1007/s10773-010-0447-6 · Cited by 21 · see citing works
On Codazzi Tensors on a Hyperbolic Surface and Flat Lorentzian Geometry
Bonsante, F., & Seppi, A. (2015) · International Mathematics Research Notices · doi:10.1093/imrn/rnv144 · Cited by 20 · see citing works
Cosmological measurements, time and observables in (2+1)-dimensional gravityPreprint
Meusburger, C. (2012) · Cited by 19 · see citing works
Group Actions on Lorentz Spaces, Mathematical Aspects: A Survey
Barbot, T., & Zeghib, A. (2004) · Birkhäuser Basel eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-0348-7953-8_12 · Cited by 17 · see citing works
Cosmological measurements, time and observables in (2+1)-dimensional gravity
Meusburger, C. (2009) · Classical and Quantum Gravity · doi:10.1088/0264-9381/26/5/055006 · Cited by 15 · see citing works
Could the universe have an exotic topology?
Moncrief, V., & Mondal, P. (2019) · Pure and Applied Mathematics Quarterly · doi:10.4310/pamq.2019.v15.n3.a7 · Cited by 15 · see citing works
Constant mean curvature foliations of simplicial flat spacetimes
Andersson, L. (2005) · Communications in Analysis and Geometry · doi:10.4310/cag.2005.v13.n5.a6 · Cited by 15 · see citing works
Relativistic Teichmüller theory: a Hamilton-Jacobi approach to 2+1–dimensional Einstein gravity
Moncrief, V. (2007) · Surveys in Differential Geometry · doi:10.4310/sdg.2007.v12.n1.a6 · Cited by 12 · see citing works
Sur la géométrie de la singularité initiale des espaces-temps plats globalement hyperboliques
Belraouti, M. (2014) · Annales de l’institut Fourier · doi:10.5802/aif.2854 · Cited by 11 · see citing works
Reflections on the U(1) problem in general relativity
Moncrief, V. (2013) · Journal of Fixed Point Theory and Applications · doi:10.1007/s11784-014-0159-2 · Cited by 10 · see citing works
Grafting and Poisson Structure in (2+1)-Gravity with Vanishing Cosmological Constant
Meusburger, C. (2006) · Communications in Mathematical Physics · doi:10.1007/s00220-006-0037-x · Cited by 10 · see citing works
Grafting and Poisson structure in (2+1)-gravity with vanishing cosmological constantPreprint
Meusburger, C. (2013) · Cited by 8 · see citing works
(2+1) Einstein spacetimes of finite type
Benedetti, R., & Bonsante, F. (2009) · IRMA lectures in mathematics and theoretical physics · doi:10.4171/055-1/15 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
Self-citationAsymptotic behavior of Cauchy hypersurfaces in constant curvature space–times
Belraouti, M. (2017) · Geometriae Dedicata · doi:10.1007/s10711-017-0230-4 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
Wick rotations in 3D gravity: ML(H2)-spacetimesPreprint
Benedetti, R., & Bonsante, F. (2004) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.math/0412470 · Cited by 6 · see citing works
Self-citationIn search of fundamental discreteness in (2 + 1)-dimensional quantum gravity
Budd, T., & Loll, R. (2009) · Classical and Quantum Gravity · doi:10.1088/0264-9381/26/18/185011 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
Affine deformations of quasi‐divisible convex cones
Nie, X., & Seppi, A. (2023) · Proceedings of the London Mathematical Society · doi:10.1112/plms.12537 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
About a Quantum Field Theory for 3D Gravity
Benedetti, R. (2004) · Milan Journal of Mathematics · doi:10.1007/s00032-004-0024-7 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
Self-citation0 Geometry and observables in (2+1)-gravityPreprint
Meusburger, C. (2010) · Cited by 3 · see citing works
Constant curvature ( 2 + 1 ) -spacetimes and projective structures
Bonsante, F. (2005) · Séminaire de théorie spectrale et géométrie · doi:10.5802/tsg.230 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Length functions in Teichmüller and anti-de Sitter geometry
Mazzoli, F., & Viaggi, G. (2023) · Forum of Mathematics Sigma · doi:10.1017/fms.2023.100 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Global Lorentzian geometry from lightlike geodesics: What does an observer in (2+1)-gravity see?Preprint
Meusburger, C. (2010) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1001.1842 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Spacetime Geometry in (2+1)-gravity via Measurements with Returning Lightrays
Meusburger, C., Kowalski-Glikman, J., Durka, R., & Szczachor, M. (2009) · AIP conference proceedings · doi:10.1063/1.3284381 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Big-bang limit of 2 + 1 gravity and Thurston boundary of Teichmüller space
Mondal, P. (2023) · Journal of Mathematical Physics · doi:10.1063/5.0136631 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Geometry and observables in (2+1)-gravity
Meusburger, C. (2010) · General Relativity and Gravitation · doi:10.1007/s10714-010-0981-9 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
3D Quantum Hyperbolic Field TheoryPreprint
Baseilhac, S., & Benedetti, R. (2004) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.math/0409282 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Self-citationThurston boundary of the Teichmüller space is the space of big bang singularities of 2+1 gravityPreprint
Mondal, P. (2020) · arXiv (Cornell University) · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Quantum Gravity in 2+1 Dimensions
Carlip, S. J. (2024) · Encyclopedia of Mathematical Physics · doi:10.1016/b978-0-323-95703-8.00256-1 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Representations for creation and annihilation operators
Guadagnini, E. (2012) · Journal of Physics A Mathematical and Theoretical · doi:10.1088/1751-8113/46/3/035402
Self-citationGravity is Geometry, after all
Ashtekar, A., Berger, B. K., Isenberg, J. A., & MacCallum, M. A. H. (2015) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9781139583961.010
Global Behavior of Solutions to Einstein's Equations
Isenberg, J. A., Aretakis, S., Rodnianski, I., & Moncrief, V. (2015) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9781139583961.013
HAMILTONIAN REDUCTION OF EINSTEIN’S EQUATIONS
Fischer, A. E., & Moncrief, V. (2024) · Encyclopedia of Mathematical Physics · doi:10.1016/b978-0-323-95703-8.00250-0
- Authors
- Benedetti, R., & Guadagnini, E.
- Affiliations
- University of Pisa (IT)
- Corresponding author
- Benedetti, Riccardo
- Guadagnini, Enore
- Venue
- Nuclear Physics B
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2001-10
- Volume
- 613
- Issue
- 1-2
- Pages
- 330-352
- ISSN
- 0550-3213 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1987723555
- Semantic Scholar
- dd705f904dded399c0700767b53c5fcebe173e9e
- Cited by
- 43
- References
- 16
- Citations by year
- 2024: 2 · 2023: 3 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 4
- FWCI
- 1.02
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Locations
- Nuclear Physics B (publishedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- CINECA IRIS Institutial research information system (University of Pisa) (submittedVersion)
- CERN Document Server (European Organization for Nuclear Research) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Relativity and Gravitational Theory
- Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Geometry and Topology › Geometric and Algebraic Topology
- Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Applied Mathematics › Geometric Analysis and Curvature Flows
- Keywords
- cosmic time, three-dimensional gravity, flat spacetime, globally hyperbolic spacetimes, holonomy, initial singularity, fundamental group, real trees, Teichmüller space, Riemann surfaces, Thurston boundary, cosmological constant
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-11-03.
Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-11-03.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review