Cited by 43Relativity and Gravitational TheoryGeometric and Algebraic TopologyGeometric Analysis and Curvature Flows

Cosmological Time in (2+1) - Gravity

Open access
Benedetti, Riccardo, Guadagnini, Enore·2001·Nuclear Physics B

Abstract

Abstract We consider maximal globally hyperbolic flat (2+1)-spacetimes with compact space S of genus g>1. For any spacetime M of this type, the length of time that the events have been in existence is M defines a global time, called the cosmological time CT of M, which reveals deep intrinsic properties of spacetime. In particular, the past/future asymptotic states of the cosmological time recover and decouple the linear and the translational parts of the ISO(2,1)-valued holonomy of the flat spacetime. The initial singularity can be interpreted as an isometric action of the fundamental group of S on a suitable real tree. The initial singularity faithfully manifests itself as a lack of smoothness of the embedding of the CT level surfaces into the spacetime M. The cosmological time determines a real analytic curve in the Teichmuller space of Riemann surfaces of genus g, which connects an interior point (associated to the linear part of the holonomy) with a point on Thurston's natural boundary (associated to the initial singularity).

AI snapshot

Written from the paper’s full text.

TL;DR

The paper shows that maximal globally hyperbolic, matter-free flat (2+1) spacetimes with compact space of genus \(g>1\) have a regular cosmological time whose level surfaces and asymptotic states encode the spacetime’s holonomy and initial singularity. It interprets the initial singularity as a real tree quotient and relates the cosmological time to a real analytic curve in Teichmüller space ending on Thurston’s natural boundary.

Key findings

  • For these spacetimes, the cosmological time \(\tau:M\to(0,\infty[\) is surjective and regular, defines a global time, and each level surface \(S_a\) is a future Cauchy surface; the level surfaces lift to \(\tilde S_a\) with \(S_a=\tilde S_a/\pi_1(S)\).
  • The initial singularity is described by a unique past-directed timelike geodesic arc from each \(p\in U(M)\) to \(\partial U(M)\); the union \(T\) of endpoints is an \(\mathbb R\)-tree with a natural isometric \(\pi_1(S)\)-action, and the quotient \(i(M)=T/\pi_1(S)\) is the initial singularity. For simplicial-type spacetimes, \(T\) is a simplicial real tree.
  • The CT level surfaces are in general only \(C^1\)-embedded into \(M\), not \(C^2\); the lack of smoothness occurs on a geodesic lamination \(L_a\) of \(S_a\). Components of \(\tilde S_a\setminus\tilde L_a\) are either isometric to open sets of \(I(a)\) or are flat bands projecting to annuli; flat annuli occur only if the maximal multi-curve sublamination \(L\) is nonempty.
  • The CT asymptotic states recover and decouple the linear and translational parts of the \(ISO(2,1)\)-valued holonomy. The CT determines a real analytic curve \(\gamma_M:(0,\infty[\to T_g\) connecting \(F\in T_g\) to a point \([T]\in\partial T_g\) on Thurston’s natural boundary; the paper also states a conjecture that the CMC time has the same asymptotic states as the CT.

Methods

  • Theoretical study of maximal globally hyperbolic, matter-free (2+1)-spacetimes \(M\) of topological type \(S\times\mathbb R\), where \(S\) is a compact closed oriented surface of genus \(g>1\), with vanishing cosmological constant so \(M\) is flat; spacetimes are assumed time-oriented and future expanding.
  • Uses the cosmological time function \(\tau(q)=\sup L(c)\) over past-directed causal curves from \(q\), regular CT theory, Minkowskian suspensions \(M(F)=I^+(0)/\Gamma\), deformed spacetimes \(U(M)/\Gamma'\) with holonomy \(\Gamma'=\Gamma+t(\Gamma)\), and simplicial-type deformations governed by weighted multi-curves.
  • Analyzes the geometry via Lorentzian causality, convex domains in Minkowski space, real trees, geodesic laminations, measured geodesic laminations, marked spectra, Teichmüller space, and Thurston’s natural compactification, relying on results of Mess, Thurston, Morgan–Shalen, and Otal.

Limitations

  • The paper states that proofs are postponed to a commentary with references to existing literature, that the CMC-time comparison is a conjecture, and that some figures are “just evocative” and not geometrically exact.
  • The main results assume matter-free, future-expanding flat spacetimes with compact space of genus \(g>1\); the toric case \(g=1\) and negative cosmological constant are treated only as complements.
  • The text makes evident that the work is theoretical and relies on prior results rather than presenting independent empirical data or numerical experiments.

Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0550-3213(01)00386-8

Cites

17 of 17 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Nothing to recompute.

Claims the paper makes

0 of 37 cited sources checked · 0 supported · 0 flagged

  • Findingnone given
    § 3.3 Spacetimes of simplicial type · p. 6

    The initial singularity of U(M0) is the segment J0 = {x1=x3=0, 0≤x2≤r}.

    “The initial singularity of U ( M 0 ) is the segment J 0 = { x 1 = x 3 = 0 0 ≤ x 2 ≤ r } .”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Findingreasoning
    § Abstract · p. 1

    For any maximal globally hyperbolic flat (2+1)-spacetime M with compact space S of genus g>1, the cosmological time CT is a global time on M.

    “For any spacetime M of this type, the length of time that the events have been in existence is M defines a global time, called the cosmological time CT of M , which reveals deep intrinsic properties of spacetime.”
    • Also stated in: § 4 The cosmological time of (2+1)-spacetimes · p. 9 · plain
      “The cosmological time function, τ : M → (0 , ∞ [ , is surjective and regular, so that it defines a global time on M .”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
    • The authors state this as an assumption: The space is future expanding.
    • The authors state this as an assumption: The maximal hyperbolic flat spacetimes considered are time-oriented and their orientations locally agree with the usual ones on M2+1.
  • Findingnone given
    § 3.3 Spacetimes of simplicial type · p. 6

    In the elementary deformation M0, the CT level surfaces S~_a of U(M0) are only C^1-embedded into U(M0).

    “The surfaces ˜ S a are only C 1 -embedded into U ( M 0 ).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Findingreasoning
    § 4.1 Initial singularity - external view · p. 10

    When M is of simplicial type, the corresponding real tree T is actually a simplicial real tree.

    “When M is of simplicial type, the corresponding real tree T is actually a simplicial real tree.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Findingnone given
    § 5.2 Spacetime with negative cosmological constant · p. 19

    The asymptotic state for t→-π/2, i.e. the initial singularity of D(M), is equal to the initial singularity of M.

    “The asymptotic state for t →-π/ 2 (i.e. the initial singularity) is equal to the initial singularity of M .”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims. 24
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 13
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingnone given
    § 3.3 Spacetimes of simplicial type · p. 7

    The CT of the covering U(M0) passes to the quotient M0 = U(M0)/π1; each level surface S_a is only C^1-embedded into M0, so that it is endowed with an induced C^1-Riemannian metric.

    “The CT of the covering U ( M 0 ) passes to the quotient M 0 = U ( M 0 ) /π 1 ; each level surface S a is only C 1 -embedded into M 0 , so that it is endowed with an induced C 1 -Riemannian metric.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Findingnone given
    § 1 Introduction. · p. 2

    The level surfaces S_a of the CT are in general only C^1-embedded into the spacetime M.

    “Differently to the case of the CMC time (for instance), the level surfaces S a of the CT are in general only C 1 -embedded into the spacetime M .”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingcitation
    § 3.3 Spacetimes of simplicial type · p. 5

    Spacetimes of simplicial type are 'dense' in the set of all spacetimes; the shape of any spacetime and of its CT can be arbitrarily well approximated by some spacetime of simplicial type.

    “Spacetimes of simplicial type are important because they are 'dense' in the set of all spacetimes; the shape of any spacetime and of its CT can be arbitrarily well approximated by some spacetime of simplicial type (see proposition 4.23).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites proposition 4.23

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • May combine two claims.

    Findingnone given
    § 2 The Cosmological Time Function. · p. 4

    Any maximal globally hyperbolic, matter-free (2+1)-spacetime M with compact space S actually has regular cosmological time, and its initial singularity can be accurately described.

    “We are going to show that any maximal globally hyperbolic, matter-free (2+1)-spacetime M , with compact space S , actually has regular cosmological time, and its initial singularity can be accurately described.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
    • The authors state this as an assumption: The space is future expanding.
    • The authors state this as an assumption: The maximal hyperbolic flat spacetimes considered are time-oriented and their orientations locally agree with the usual ones on M2+1.
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingnone given
    § 1 Introduction. · p. 2

    The cosmological time τ is invariant under diffeomorphisms, so the τ=a level surfaces S_a provide a gauge-invariant description of space evolution in M.

    “The cosmological time τ is invariant under diffeomorphisms, therefore the τ = a level surfaces S a provide a gauge-invariant description of space evolution in M .”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Findingnone given
    § 2 The Cosmological Time Function. · p. 3

    The cosmological time function is not related to any specific choice of coordinates in N; it is gauge-invariant and represents an intrinsic feature of spacetime.

    “The cosmological time function is not related to any specific choice of coordinates in N ; it is 'gauge-invariant' and so it represents an intrinsic feature of spacetime.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingnone given
    § 5.2 Spacetime with negative cosmological constant · p. 19

    D(M) is locally anti de Sitter; up to a translation, t gives the CT.

    “D ( M ) is locally anti de Sitter; up to a translation, t gives the CT.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingreasoning
    § 5.2 Spacetime with negative cosmological constant · p. 19

    For anti-de Sitter suspensions, up to a translation the function t gives the CT and it has both an initial and a final singularity, both reduced to one point.

    “Up to a translation, the function t gives the CT and it has many qualitative properties similar to the CT of the Minkowskian suspensions, but we have now both an initial and a final singularity, both reduced to one point.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingreasoning
    § 5.1 Toric space ( g = 1 ) · p. 18

    For the toric case, lim_{a→∞} l_{S_a}/a = I_H and lim_{a→0} l_{S_a} = I_V.

    “Then: lim a →∞ l S a /a = I H and lim a → 0 l S a = I V .”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Findingnone given
    § 3.3 Spacetimes of simplicial type · p. 8

    The construction of M(F) and of M(F,L) can be performed for any hyperbolic surface F, not necessarily compact nor of finite area.

    “The construction of M ( F ) and of M ( F, L ) can be performed for any hyperbolic surface F , not necessarily compact nor of finite area.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingreasoning
    § 4.5 CT asymptotic states · p. 16

    The image of I in (R≥0)^C is a positive cone based on the origin and positive rays go onto positive rays.

    “The image in ( R ≥ 0 ) C is a positive cone based on the origin and positive rays go onto positive rays, in a obvious sense.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [O]

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • May combine two claims.

    Findingnone given
    § Proposition 4.10 For every a ∈ (0 , ∞ [ : · p. 12

    For every a in (0,∞), S_a tilde is geodesically complete and for each p ≠ q in S_a tilde there is a unique geodesic arc connecting p and q.

    “˜ S a is geodesically complete and for each p = q ∈ ˜ S a , there is a unique geodesic arc connecting p and q .”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingreasoning
    § 4.3 CT duality · p. 14

    For an arc J in I(1) transverse to the leaves of F tilde, the map p_a lifts J to an arc J' in S_a tilde transverse to the leaves of L'_a tilde, and the distance d on T lifts to a measure μ_J' tilde on J' which gives the required π1-equivariant transverse measure on F.

    “On the other hand, by means of the map i a , the distance d on T lifts to a measure ˜ µ J ′ on J ′ which finally gives us the required ( π 1 -equivariant) transverse measure on F .”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).

    Findingnone given
    § 4.5 CT asymptotic states · p. 18

    For a spacetime of simplicial type, the depth of the annular regions is constant on each S_a.

    “To prove proposition 4.25 in this case, one has to note that the depth of the annular regions is constant on each S a .”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingcitation
    § 4.5 CT asymptotic states · p. 16

    The maps I: MGL(F)→(R≥0)^C and s: GT(S)→(R≥0)^C obtained by taking marked spectra satisfy I = s ∘ ∆ and I is injective.

    “Proposition 4.20 Consider the maps, I : MGL ( F ) → ( R ≥ 0 ) C and s : GT ( S ) → ( R ≥ 0 ) C , obtained by taking the corresponding marked spectra. Then I = s ◦ ∆ and is injective.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [O]

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • May combine two claims.

    Findingreasoning
    § 4.5 CT asymptotic states · p. 18

    When a → 0, the contribution to the length of any curve on S_a of the part contained in the nonannular components becomes negligible, the length of the annuli boundaries goes linearly to zero, so that only the transverse crossing of the annuli becomes dominant.

    “When a → 0, the contribution (to the length of any curve on S a ) of the part contained in the nonannular components becomes negligible, the length of the annuli boundaries goes linearly to zero, so that only the transverse crossing of the annuli becomes dominant.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingreasoning
    § 4 The cosmological time of (2+1)-spacetimes · p. 9

    The action of π1(S) on U(M) restricts to a free, properly discontinuous isometric action on S~_a such that S_a = S~_a/π1(S).

    “In other words, the action of π 1 ( S ) on U ( M ) restricts to a free, properly discontinuous isometric action on ˜ S a such that S a = ˜ S a /π 1 ( S ) .”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingreasoning
    § 4.5 CT asymptotic states · p. 17

    The curve γ_M is real analytic and connects F ∈ T_g with the point on the natural boundary [T] ∈ ∂T_g.

    “This is a real analytic curve which connects F ∈ T g with the point on the natural boundary [ T ] ∈ ∂T g (here [ . ] denotes the projective class).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingnone given
    § 3.3 Spacetimes of simplicial type · p. 8

    Each tile has its own CT; all the cosmological times fit well together and define the CT of U(M) which passes to the quotient M.

    “Note that each tile has its own CT; all the cosmological times fit well together and define the CT of U ( M ) which passes to the quotient M .”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingreasoning
    § 4.5 CT asymptotic states · p. 18

    When a → ∞, the annuli depth goes to zero because of the rescaling by 1/a, and the length spectrum converges to the spectrum of F.

    “When a → ∞ , the annuli depth goes to zero because of the rescaling by 1 /a , and the length spectrum converge to the spectrum of F .”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § 2 The Cosmological Time Function. · p. 3

    When τ is regular, τ : N → (0,∞[ is a continuous function, twice differentiable almost everywhere, giving a global time CT on N.

    “In particular when τ is regular, τ : N → (0 , ∞ [ is a continuous function, which is twice differentiable almost everywhere, giving a global time on N denoted by CT.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [A-G-H]

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisenone given
    § 2 The Cosmological Time Function. · p. 2

    In standard flat Minkowski space M^{n+1}, the cosmological time τ is the constant ∞-valued function.

    “For example, if N is the standard flat Minkowski space M n +1 , τ is the constant ∞ -valued function, so in this case it is not very interesting.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § 3.2 (2+1) spacetimes as deformed Minkowskian suspensions · p. 5

    The linear part Γ of Γ' is a subgroup of SO+(2,1) which is isomorphic to π1(S) and acts freely and properly discontinuously on I(1)≅H2.

    “The 'linear part' Γ of Γ ′ is a subgroup of SO + (2 , 1) which is isomorphic to π 1 ( S ) and acts freely and properly discontinuously on I (1) ∼ = H 2 . This is a non trivial fact which follows from a result of Goldman [Go].”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [Go]

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning
    § 1 Introduction. · p. 2

    Both the intrinsic and extrinsic geometry of the surfaces S_a, as well as their past/future asymptotic states, are intrinsic features of spacetime.

    “Both the intrinsic and extrinsic geometry of the surfaces S a , as well as their past/future asymptotic states, are intrinsic features of spacetime.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given
    § 2 The Cosmological Time Function. · p. 3

    The union of the past asymptotic end-points of these rays can be regarded as the initial singularity of N.

    “The union of the past asymptotic end-points of these rays can be regarded as the initial singularity of N .”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisereasoning
    § 3.2 (2+1) spacetimes as deformed Minkowskian suspensions · p. 5

    U(M) is the universal covering of M and Γ' is isomorphic to π1(M) ≅ π1(S).

    “Hence U ( M ) is the universal covering of M and Γ ′ is isomorphic to π 1 ( M ) ∼ = π 1 ( S ).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [Me]

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § 2 The Cosmological Time Function. · p. 3

    When τ is regular, each τ level surface is a future Cauchy surface, so that N is globally hyperbolic.

    “Each τ level surface is a future Cauchy surface, so that N is globally hyperbolic.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [A-G-H]

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Interpretationreasoning
    § 4.5 CT asymptotic states · p. 18

    The general case follows by using the density stated in proposition 4.23.

    “The general case follows by using the density stated in proposition 4.23.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationnone given
    § 4.6 A commentary on the proofs · p. 18

    The spacetimes materialize the duality between measured geodesic laminations and real trees.

    “It is an amazing fact that the spacetimes 'materialize' this subtle duality in the way we have seen.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation
    § 4.6 A commentary on the proofs · p. 18

    A complete proof of the duality of propositions 4.19 and 4.20 can be found in [O].

    “In particular one can find in [O] a complete proof of the duality (see proposition 4.19 and proposition 4.20).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [O]

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given
    § 4.6 A commentary on the proofs · p. 18

    In the spacetime setting, the choice of the base hyperbolic surface F is fixed by the linear part of the holonomy of M, that is by its future asymptotic state.

    “Note also that, in the spacetime setting, the choice of the base hyperbolic surface F (see remark 4.24 4) is fixed by the linear part of the holonomy of M , that is by its future asymptotic state.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation
    § 4.6 A commentary on the proofs · p. 18

    The identification between cocycles of a spacetime M with measured geodesic laminations on F=I(1)/Γ is due to Mess.

    “The identification between cocycles of a spacetime M with measured geodesic laminations on F = I (1) / Γ is due to Mess [Me].”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [Me]

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisereasoning
    § 4.1 Initial singularity - external view · p. 12

    There is no non-empty strictly sub-tree which is invariant for this action, and for each segment in the tree, the subgroup of π1(S) which keeps the segment invariant is virtually Abelian.

    “This means that there is no non-empty strictly sub-tree which is invariant for this action, and that, for each segment in the tree, the subgroup of π 1 ( S ) which keeps the segment invariant is virtually Abelian.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [O]

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationnone given
    § 5.2 Spacetime with negative cosmological constant · p. 19

    D(F) can be obtained from the Minkowskian suspension M(F) by warping and doubling; D(F) and M(F) have the same initial singularity; the future asymptotic state of M(F) becomes the level surface of the CT on D(F) where expansion ends and collapsing begins.

    “In a sense, D ( F ) can be obtained by the Minkowskian suspension M ( F ) by a procedure of warping and doubling ; D ( F ) and M ( F ) have the same initial singularity; the future asymptotic state of M ( F ) 'becomes' the level surface of the CT on D ( F ) where the expansion ends and the collapsing begins.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation
    § 4.6 A commentary on the proofs · p. 18

    The geometric interpretation of the Morgan-Shalen convergence is due to Paulin and Bestvina.

    “The geometric interpretation of the Morgan-Shalen convergence (see remark 4.24 3) is due to Paulin and Bestvina (c.f. the bibliography of [O]).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [O]

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation
    § 4.6 A commentary on the proofs · p. 18

    The dual approach via real trees is due to Morgan-Shalen.

    “The dual approach via real trees is due to Morgan-Shalen [M-S] [M-S2].”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [M-S]

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • cites [M-S2]

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

36 of 36
  • The authors state this as an assumption.

    The space is future expanding.

    “we will always assume that the space is future expanding”
  • The authors state this as an assumption.

    The maximal hyperbolic flat spacetimes considered are time-oriented and their orientations locally agree with the usual ones on M2+1.

    “We assume that our maximal hyperbolic flat spacetimes are time-oriented and future expanding, and that these orientations locally agree with the usual ones on M 2+1 .”
2 of 2

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The degeneration of the spatial geometry at the initial singularity carries over to the higher genus case.

    “Moreover, the degeneration of the spatial geometry at the initial singularity carries over to the higher genus case [200, 55].”
  • When Λ = 0, a set of parameters describing the initial singularity and a second set describing the asymptotic future geometry together completely determine the spacetime.

    “Benedetti and Guadagnini have shown that when Λ = 0, a set of parameters describing the initial singularity and a second set describing the geometry in the asymptotic future together completely determine the spacetime [55].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 5

  1. J.T. Beem, P.E. Ehrlich, K.L. Easley, Global Lorentzian Geometry, 2nd edn., Pure and Applied Mathematics, Vol. 202, Dekker
  2. Fathi, 1979, Travaux de Thurston sur les surfaces, Astérisque, 66
  3. S. Hawking, G.F.W. Ellis, The Large Scale Structure of Space–Time, Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge
  4. Morgan, 1985, Ann. Math., 122, 398
  5. Otal, 1996, Le théorème d'hyperbolisation pour les variétés fibrées de dimension trois, Astérisque, 235

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Benedetti, R., & Guadagnini, E.
Affiliations
University of Pisa (IT)
Corresponding author
  • Benedetti, Riccardo
  • Guadagnini, Enore
Venue
Nuclear Physics B
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2001-10
Volume
613
Issue
1-2
Pages
330-352
ISSN
0550-3213 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1987723555
Cited by
43
References
16
Citations by year
2024: 2 · 2023: 3 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 4
FWCI
1.02
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nuclear Physics B (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • CINECA IRIS Institutial research information system (University of Pisa) (submittedVersion)
  • CERN Document Server (European Organization for Nuclear Research) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Relativity and Gravitational Theory
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Geometry and Topology › Geometric and Algebraic Topology
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Applied Mathematics › Geometric Analysis and Curvature Flows
Keywords
cosmic time, three-dimensional gravity, flat spacetime, globally hyperbolic spacetimes, holonomy, initial singularity, fundamental group, real trees, Teichmüller space, Riemann surfaces, Thurston boundary, cosmological constant

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-11-03.

Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-11-03.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review