The DOI matches its Crossref record; 29 of the 33 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Oklo bound on the time variation of the fine-structure constant revisited
Open accessOverview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“Damour and Dyson (1996), Fujii et al. (2000) also assumed a Maxwell distribution but let the moderator temperature vary so that they deduce an effective cross-section rðR r ; TÞ.They respectively restricted the temperature range to 180 C”
From Fundamental constants: from measurement to the universe, a window on gravitation and cosmology (2025) · cites this paper as Damour and Dyson (1996)
In the citing paper
“and (Gould et al. 2006)”
From Fundamental constants: from measurement to the universe, a window on gravitation and cosmology (2025) · cites this paper as Damour and Dyson (1996)
In the citing paper
“In particular this analysis (Damour and Dyson 1996) showed that the Bethe-Weiza ¨cker formula overestimates by about a factor the 2 the a EM -sensitivity to the resonance energy.”
From Fundamental constants: from measurement to the universe, a window on gravitation and cosmology (2025) · cites this paper as Damour and Dyson (1996)
In the citing paper
“It follows from this analysis that a EM DE r Da EM ' À1:1 MeV:ð164Þ”
From Fundamental constants: from measurement to the universe, a window on gravitation and cosmology (2025) · cites this paper as Damour and Dyson (1996)
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Quantum Mechanics-Nonrelativistic Theory
LANDAU, L. D., Lifshit︠s︡, E. M., Sykes, J. B., Bell, J. S., & Rose, M. E. (1965) · Cited by 1,565
DIRAC, P. A. M. (1937) · Nature · doi:10.1038/139323a0 · Cited by 1,495
The string dilation and a least coupling principle
Damour, T., & Polyakov, A. M. (1994) · Nuclear Physics B · doi:10.1016/0550-3213(94)90143-0 · Cited by 1,275
Self-citationMughabghab, S. F., Divadeenam, M., & Holden, N. E. (1981) · International Linear Collider · Cited by 922
Bromley, D. A. (1985) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-1-4615-8100-0 · Cited by 759
Furry, W. H., Hamermesh, M., Brown, W., & Beyer, R. T. (1960) · Physics Today · doi:10.1063/1.3056990 · Cited by 738
The Physical Theory of Neutron Chain Reactors
Weinberg, A. M., Wigner, E. P., & Cohen, E. R. (1958) · Virtual Defense Library (Ministerio de Defensa) · Cited by 728
The physical theory of neutron chain reactors
L.R. (1958) · Nuclear Physics · doi:10.1016/0029-5582(58)90365-1 · Cited by 568 · cited 1×
“n is a “reduced partial width” (see, e.g., [ 32 ]).”
Damour, T., & Polyakov, A. M. (1994) · General Relativity and Gravitation · doi:10.1007/bf02106709 · Cited by 462
Self-citationNuclear masses from a unified macroscopic-microscopic model
Möller, P., & Nix, J. R. (1988) · Atomic Data and Nuclear Data Tables · doi:10.1016/0092-640x(88)90022-8 · Cited by 371
Research works printed but not linked: 4
- Dirac, 1938, 165, 199
- Varshalovich, 1996, Astronomy Letters, 22, 6
- Mughabghab, 1984, Vol. 1
- Otten, 1989, Nuclear Radii and Moments of Unstable Nuclei, Vol. 8, 517
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The Confrontation between General Relativity and Experiment
Will, C. M. (2014) · Living Reviews in Relativity · doi:10.12942/lrr-2014-4 · Cited by 3,996
“Cs clock [115] Oklo Natural Reactor [41] 21-cm vs.”
BackgroundTheory and Experiment in Gravitational Physics
Will, C. M. (2018) · doi:10.1017/9781316338612 · Cited by 3,637
The Confrontation between General Relativity and Experiment
Will, C. M. (2006) · Living Reviews in Relativity · doi:10.12942/lrr-2006-3 · Cited by 1,606
“15 Oklo Natural Reactor [72] < 5× 10−12 10(9) Big Bang nucleosynthesis [179, 223] e-p mass ratio < 3× 10−15 2.”
BackgroundKhoury, J., & Weltman, A. (2004) · Physical Review D · doi:10.1103/physrevd.69.044026 · Cited by 1,634
Quintessence and the Rest of the World: Suppressing Long-Range Interactions
Carroll, S. M. (1998) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.81.3067 · Cited by 1,172
The fundamental constants and their variation: observational and theoretical status
Uzan, J. (2003) · Reviews of Modern Physics · doi:10.1103/revmodphys.75.403 · Cited by 1,214
“Damour and Dyson (1996) related the variation of Er to the fine structure constant by taking into account that the radiative capture of the neutron by 14962 Sm corresponds to the existence of an excited quantum state 150 62 Sm (so that Er = E ∗ 150−E149−mn) and by assuming that the nuclear energy…”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialReconstruction of a Scalar-Tensor Theory of Gravity in an Accelerating Universe
Boisseau, B., Esposito-Farèse, G., Polarski, D., & Starobinsky, A. A. (2000) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.85.2236 · Cited by 873
Further Evidence for Cosmological Evolution of the Fine Structure Constant
Webb, J. K., Murphy, M. T., Flambaum, V. V., Dzuba, V. A., Barrow, J. D., Churchill, C. W., Prochaska, J. X., & Wolfe, A. M. (2001) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.87.091301 · Cited by 824
Varying Constants, Gravitation and Cosmology
Uzan, J. (2011) · Living Reviews in Relativity · doi:10.12942/lrr-2011-2 · Cited by 880
“While most studies focus on the samarium, [220] also includes the gadolinium even though it is not clear whether it can reliably be measured [123].”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialSearch for Time Variation of the Fine Structure Constant
Webb, J. K., Flambaum, V. V., Churchill, C. W., Drinkwater, M. J., & Barrow, J. D. (1999) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.82.884 · Cited by 754
The Confrontation between General Relativity and Experiment
Will, C. M. (2001) · Living Reviews in Relativity · doi:10.12942/lrr-2001-4 · Cited by 609
“Cs clock [115] Oklo Natural Reactor [41] 21-cm vs.”
BackgroundInfluentialFurther evidence for a variable fine-structure constant from Keck/HIRES QSO absorption spectra
Murphy, M. T., Webb, J. K., & Flambaum, V. V. (2003) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1046/j.1365-8711.2003.06970.x · Cited by 514
“…(Prestage et al. 1995) and fountains (Sortaiset al. 2001), analysis of149Sm isotopic abundances from the Oklo natural fission reactor in Gabon, Africa (Shlyakhter 1976; Damour & Dyson 1996), and meteoritic constraints on the long-livedβdecay rate of187Re (Peebles & Dicke 1962; Dyson 1967, 1972).”
BackgroundPrimordial nucleosynthesis: From precision cosmology to fundamental physics
Fabio Iocco, A., Mangano, G., Miele, G., Pisanti, O., & Serpico, P. D. (2009) · Physics Reports · doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2009.02.002 · Cited by 554
Dark energy from mass varying neutrinos
Fardon, R., Nelson, A. E., & Weiner, N. (2004) · Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics · doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2004/10/005 · Cited by 414
Violations of the equivalence principle in a dilaton-runaway scenario
Damour, T., Piazza, F., & VENEZIANO, G. (2002) · Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology/Physical review. D. Particles and fields · doi:10.1103/physrevd.66.046007 · Cited by 429
Self-citationNew BBN limits on physics beyond the standard model from 4He
Cyburt, R. H., Fields, B. D., Olive, K. A., & Skillman, E. D. (2005) · Astroparticle Physics · doi:10.1016/j.astropartphys.2005.01.005 · Cited by 403
Varying Constants, Gravitation and Cosmology
Uzan, J. (2011) · DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) · Cited by 392
Runaway Dilaton and Equivalence Principle Violations
Damour, T., Piazza, F., & VENEZIANO, G. (2002) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.89.081601 · Cited by 386
Self-citationMurphy, M. T., Webb, J. K., Flambaum, V. V., Dzuba, V. A., Churchill, C. W., Prochaska, J. X., Barrow, J. D., & Wolfe, A. M. (2001) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1046/j.1365-8711.2001.04840.x · Cited by 365
“Damour & Dyson (1996) have also analysed the problem with different model assumptions and claim −0.9× 10−7 ∆α/α 1.2 × 10−7.”
InfluentialEnvironmental dependence of masses and coupling constants
Olive, K. A., & Pospelov, M. (2008) · Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology/Physical review. D. Particles and fields · doi:10.1103/physrevd.77.043524 · Cited by 358
A Simple Cosmology with a Varying Fine Structure Constant
Sandvik, H. B., Barrow, J. D., & Magueijo, J. (2002) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.88.031302 · Cited by 314
Cosmologies with varying light speed
Barrow, J. D. (1999) · Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology/Physical review. D. Particles and fields · doi:10.1103/physrevd.59.043515 · Cited by 303
Search for Variations of Fundamental Constants using Atomic Fountain Clocks
Marion, H., Pereira Dos Santos, F., Abgrall, M., Zhang, S., Sortais, Y., Bize, S., Maksimovic, I., Calonico, D., Grünert, J., Mandache, C., et al. (2003) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.90.150801 · Cited by 298
Scalar-tensor gravity and quintessence
Bartolo, N., & Pietroni, M. (1999) · Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology/Physical review. D. Particles and fields · doi:10.1103/physrevd.61.023518 · Cited by 296
Equivalence principle violations and couplings of a light dilaton
Damour, T., & Donoghue, J. F. (2010) · Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology/Physical review. D. Particles and fields · doi:10.1103/physrevd.82.084033 · Cited by 330
“Indeed, the analysis of the Oklo data [46, 47, 48] shows that this resonance has not changed by more than about 0.”
Self-citationLimit on the Present Temporal Variation of the Fine Structure Constant
Peik, E., Lipphardt, B., Schnatz, H., Schneider, T., Tamm, C., & Karshenboim, S. G. (2004) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.93.170801 · Cited by 282
Primordial Nucleosynthesis: from precision cosmology to fundamental physicsPreprint
Fabio Iocco, A., Mangano, G., Miele, G., Pisanti, O., & Serpico, P. D. (2013) · Cited by 329
New varying speed of light theories
Magueijo, J. (2003) · Reports on Progress in Physics · doi:10.1088/0034-4885/66/11/r04 · Cited by 314
Testing the Stability of Fundamental Constants with the Hg+199 Single-Ion Optical Clock
Bize, S., Diddams, S. A., Tanaka, U., Tanner, C. E., Oskay, W. H., Drullinger, R. E., Parker, T. E., Heavner, T. P., Jefferts, S. R., Hollberg, L. W., et al. (2003) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.90.150802 · Cited by 249
Cold atom clocks and applications
Bize, S., Laurent, P., Abgrall, M., Marion, H., Maksimovic, I., Cacciapuoti, L., Grünert, J., Vian, C., dos Santos, F. P., Rosenbusch, P., et al. (2005) · Journal of Physics B Atomic Molecular and Optical Physics · doi:10.1088/0953-4075/38/9/002 · Cited by 245
“They also complement tests of the variability of fundamental constants on different timescales, geological timescale [20, 21] and cosmological timescale [22, 23].”
BackgroundFortier, T. M., Ashby, N., Bergquist, J. C., Delaney, M. J., Diddams, S. A., Heavner, T. P., Hollberg, L., Itano, W. M., Jefferts, S. R., Kim, K., et al. (2007) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.98.070801 · Cited by 226
Stability of the Proton-to-Electron Mass Ratio
Shelkovnikov, A., Butcher, R. J., Chardonnet, C., & Amy-Klein, A. (2008) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.100.150801 · Cited by 219
Spacetime-varying couplings and Lorentz violation
Kostelecký, V. A., Lehnert, R., & Perry, M. J. (2003) · Physical Review D · doi:10.1103/physrevd.68.123511 · Cited by 212
Varying alpha in a more realistic universe
Mota, D. F., & Barrow, J. D. (2004) · Physics Letters B · doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2003.12.016 · Cited by 208
The nuclear interaction at Oklo 2 billion years ago
Fujii, Y., Iwamoto, A., Fukahori, T., Ohnuki, T., Nakagawa, M., Hidaka, H., Oura, Y., & Möller, P. (2000) · Nuclear Physics B · doi:10.1016/s0550-3213(00)00038-9 · Cited by 204
Implications of gauge unification for time variation of the fine structure constant
Langacker, P., Segrè, G., & Strassler, M. J. (2002) · Physics Letters B · doi:10.1016/s0370-2693(02)01189-9 · Cited by 193
Changing α with Time: Implications for Fifth-Force-Type Experiments and Quintessence
Dvali, G., & Zaldarriaga, M. (2002) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.88.091303 · Cited by 189
New varying speed of light theoriesPreprint
Magueijo, J. (2003) · Cited by 197
Evolution of the fine structure constant driven by dark matter and the cosmological constant
Olive, K. A., & Pospelov, M. (2002) · Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology/Physical review. D. Particles and fields · doi:10.1103/physrevd.65.085044 · Cited by 180
T HE C OSMIC M ICROWAVE B ACKGROUND AND P ARTICLE P HYSICS
Kamionkowski, M., & Kosowsky, A. B. (1999) · Annual Review of Nuclear and Particle Science · doi:10.1146/annurev.nucl.49.1.77 · Cited by 186
Varying-α theories and solutions to the cosmological problems
Barrow, J. D., & Magueijo, J. (1998) · Physics Letters B · doi:10.1016/s0370-2693(98)01294-5 · Cited by 150
Constraints on the variations of the fundamental couplings
Olive, K. A., Pospelov, M., Qian, Y.-Z., Coc, A., Cassé, M., & Vangioni–Flam, E. (2002) · Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology/Physical review. D. Particles and fields · doi:10.1103/physrevd.66.045022 · Cited by 149
Limits on variations of the quark masses, QCD scale, and fine structure constant
Flambaum, V. V., Leinweber, D. B., Thomas, A. W., & Young, R. D. (2004) · Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology/Physical review. D. Particles and fields · doi:10.1103/physrevd.69.115006 · Cited by 147
Local and global variations of the fine-structure constant
Mota, D. F., & Barrow, J. D. (2004) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2004.07505.x · Cited by 146
“The local constraints derive from experiments in our local bound gravitational system: the Oklo natural reactor (z = 0.14), where ∣ ∣ ∆α α ∣ ∣ ≤ 10−7 (Fujii et al 2000; Damour & Dyson 1996; Fujii 2003; Shlyakhter 2003).”
BackgroundInfluentialExploring cosmic origins with CORE: Cosmological parameters
Valentino, E. D., Brinckmann, T., Gerbino, M., Poulin, V., Bouchet, F. R., Julien Lesgourgues, A., MELCHIORRI, A., Chluba, J., Clesse, S., Delabrouille, J., et al. (2018) · Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics · doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2018/04/017 · Cited by 140
Quintessence and gravitational waves
Riazuelo, A., & Uzan, J.-P. (2000) · Physical Review D · doi:10.1103/physrevd.62.083506 · Cited by 134
Early-universe constraints on a time-varying fine structure constant
Avelino, P. P., Esposito, S., Mangano, G., Martins, C. J. A. P., MELCHIORRI, A., Miele, G., Pisanti, O., Rocha, G. M., & Viana, P. T. P. (2001) · Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology/Physical review. D. Particles and fields · doi:10.1103/physrevd.64.103505 · Cited by 133
Constraining variations in the fine-structure constant with the cosmic microwave background
Kaplinghat, M., Scherrer, R. J., & Turner, M. S. (1999) · Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology/Physical review. D. Particles and fields · doi:10.1103/physrevd.60.023516 · Cited by 129
Variation of fundamental couplings and nuclear forces
Beane, S. R., & A, M. J. S. (2003) · Nuclear Physics A · doi:10.1016/s0375-9474(02)01268-x · Cited by 126
Constraints on the variation of the fine structure constant from big bang nucleosynthesis
Bergström, L., Iguri, S., & Rubinstein, H. R. (1999) · Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology/Physical review. D. Particles and fields · doi:10.1103/physrevd.60.045005 · Cited by 124
Planck intermediate results: XXIV. Constraints on variations in fundamental constants⋆
Planck Collaboration:, Ade, P. A. R., Aghanim, N., Arnaud, M., Ashdown, M., Aumont, J., Baccigalupi, C., Banday, A. J., Barreiro, R. B., Battaner, E., et al. (2015) · Astronomy & Astrophysics · doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201424496 · Cited by 125
“…et al. 2008; Cingöz et al. 2008; Peik et al. 2008; Bize et al. 2003), the Oklo phenomenon at a redshift z ' 0.14 (Kuroda 1956; Shlyakhter 1976; Damour & Dyson 1996; Fujii et al. 2000a; Gould et al. 2006), meteorite dating (Wilkinson 1958; Dyson 1972; Fujii et al. 2000b; Olive et al. 2002),…”
BackgroundInfluentialPetrov, Y. V., Nazarov, A. I., Onegin, M. S., Petrov, V. Y., & Sakhnovsky, E. G. (2006) · Physical Review C · doi:10.1103/physrevc.74.064610 · Cited by 127
“The work of Damour and Dyson (1996) [11].”
BackgroundCosmological acceleration, varying couplings, and Lorentz breaking
Bertolami, O., Lehnert, R., Potting, R., & Ribeiro, A. (2004) · Physical Review D · doi:10.1103/physrevd.69.083513 · Cited by 122
Constraining Variationsin the Fine-Structure Constant, Quark Massesand the Strong Interaction
Murphy, M. T., Flambaum, V. V., Webb, J. K., Dzuba, V. V., Prochaska, J. X., & Wolfe, A. M. (2004) · Lecture Notes in Physics · doi:10.1007/978-3-540-40991-5_9 · Cited by 116
MASIERO, A., Pietroni, M., & Francesca Rosati, A. (1999) · Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology/Physical review. D. Particles and fields · doi:10.1103/physrevd.61.023504 · Cited by 118
f(T) theories and varying fine structure constant
Wei, H., Ma, X.-P., & Qi, H.-Y. (2011) · Physics Letters B · doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2011.07.042 · Cited by 115
Symmetry breaking and time variation of gauge couplings
Xavier Calmet, A., & Harald Fritzsch, A. (2002) · Physics Letters B · doi:10.1016/s0370-2693(02)02147-0 · Cited by 117
Constraints on Changes in Fundamental Constants from a Cosmologically Distant OH Absorber or Emitter
Kanekar, N., Carilli, C. L., Langston, G. I., Rocha, G. M., Combes, F., Subrahmanyan, R., Stocke, J. T., Menten, K. M., Briggs, F., & Wiklind, T. (2005) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.95.261301 · Cited by 115
Experimental tests of general relativity: recent progress and future directions
Turyshev, S. G. (2009) · Physics-Uspekhi · doi:10.3367/ufne.0179.200901a.0003 · Cited by 122
Is there correlation between fine structure and dark energy cosmic dipoles?
Mariano, A., & Perivolaropoulos, L. (2012) · Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology/Physical review. D. Particles and fields · doi:10.1103/physrevd.86.083517 · Cited by 109
Looking for a varying α in the cosmic microwave background
Avelino, P. P., Martins, C. J. A. P., Rocha, G. M., & Viana, P. T. P. (2000) · Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology/Physical review. D. Particles and fields · doi:10.1103/physrevd.62.123508 · Cited by 105
Hannestad, S. (1999) · Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology/Physical review. D. Particles and fields · doi:10.1103/physrevd.60.023515 · Cited by 104
Cosmic concordance and the fine structure constant
Battye, R. A., Crittenden, R., & Weller, J. (2001) · Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology/Physical review. D. Particles and fields · doi:10.1103/physrevd.63.043505 · Cited by 102
Models of quintessence coupled to the electromagnetic field and the cosmological evolution of alpha
Copeland, E. J., Nunes, N. J., & Pospelov, M. E. (2004) · Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology/Physical review. D. Particles and fields · doi:10.1103/physrevd.69.023501 · Cited by 102
Reexamination of the 187Re bound on the variation of fundamental couplings
Olive, K. A., Pospelov, M., Qian, Y.-Z., Manhès, G., Vangioni–Flam, E., Coc, A., & Cassé, M. (2004) · Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology/Physical review. D. Particles and fields · doi:10.1103/physrevd.69.027701 · Cited by 95
Four direct measurements of the fine-structure constant 13 billion years ago
Wilczynska, M. R., Webb, J. K., Bainbridge, M., Barrow, J. D., Bosman, S. E. I., Carswell, R. F., Da̧browski, M. P., Dumont, V., Lee, C.-C., Leite, A. C. O., et al. (2020) · UCL Discovery (University College London) · Cited by 95
Local and Global Variations of The Fine Structure Constant
Mota, D. F., & Barrow, J. D. (2003) · CERN Document Server (European Organization for Nuclear Research) · Cited by 95
Geometrodynamics of variable-speed-of-light cosmologies
Bassett, B. A., Liberati, S., Molina-Parı́s, C., & Visser, M. (2000) · Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology/Physical review. D. Particles and fields · doi:10.1103/physrevd.62.103518 · Cited by 108
Flambaum, V. V., & Shuryak, E. V. (2002) · Physical Review D · doi:10.1103/physrevd.65.103503 · Cited by 94
Time variation of the fine structure constant driven by quintessence
Anchordoqui, L. A., & Goldberg, H. (2003) · Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology/Physical review. D. Particles and fields · doi:10.1103/physrevd.68.083513 · Cited by 93
Will, C. M. (2005) · Annalen der Physik · doi:10.1002/andp.200510170 · Cited by 129
Measuring the metric: A parametrized post-Friedmannian approach to the cosmic dark energy problem
Tegmark, M. (2002) · Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology/Physical review. D. Particles and fields · doi:10.1103/physrevd.66.103507 · Cited by 95
Probing quintessence with time variation of couplings
Wetterich, C. (2003) · Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics · doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2003/10/002 · Cited by 88
Limit on the Temporal Variation of the Fine-Structure Constant Using Atomic Dysprosium
Cingöz, A., Lapierre, A., Nguyen, A.-T., Leefer, N., Budker, D., Lamoreaux, S. K., & Torgerson, J. R. (2007) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.98.040801 · Cited by 88
Crossover quintessence and cosmological history of fundamental “constants”
Wetterich, C. (2003) · Physics Letters B · doi:10.1016/s0370-2693(03)00383-6 · Cited by 84
Atomic optical clocks and search for variation of the fine-structure constant
Dzuba, V. A., & Flambaum, V. V. (2000) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.61.034502 · Cited by 82
Neutron moderation in the Oklo natural reactor and the time variation ofα
Lamoreaux, S. K., & Torgerson, J. R. (2004) · Physical Review D · doi:10.1103/physrevd.69.121701 · Cited by 82
Time variability of α from realistic models of Oklo reactors
Gould, C. R., Sharapov, E. I., & Lamoreaux, S. K. (2006) · Physical Review C · doi:10.1103/physrevc.74.024607 · Cited by 82
Reconstructing the dark energy equation of state with varying alpha
Nunes, N. J., & Lidsey, J. E. (2004) · Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology/Physical review. D. Particles and fields · doi:10.1103/physrevd.69.123511 · Cited by 82
Bize, S., Laurent, P., Abgrall, M., Marion, H., Maksimovic, I., Cacciapuoti, L., Grünert, J., Vian, C., dos Santos, F. P., Rosenbusch, P., et al. (2004) · Comptes Rendus Physique · doi:10.1016/j.crhy.2004.09.003 · Cited by 82
Astronomical measurements and constraints on the variability of fundamental constants
García-Berro, E., Isern, J., & Kubyshin, Y. (2007) · The Astronomy and Astrophysics Review · doi:10.1007/s00159-006-0004-8 · Cited by 72
“From this, the following bound (Damour and Dyson 1996) on the variation of α can be derived: −0.9 × 10−7 < α α < 1.2 × 10−7 (38) A reanalysis of the existing data using the isotopic ratios of the Gadolinium isotope pairs 155Gd/156Gd and 157Gd/158Gd separately as well as those of Sm previously…”
MethodInfluentialClock transition for a future optical frequency standard with trapped atoms
Ventrillard, I., Quessada, A., Kovacich, R. P., Brusch, A., Kolker, D., Zondy, J. ‐., Rovera, D., & Lemonde, P. (2003) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.68.030501 · Cited by 77
Cosmological Constant Versus Quintessence
Binétruy, P. (2000) · International Journal of Theoretical Physics · doi:10.1023/a:1003697832568 · Cited by 74
Limits to time variation of fundamental constants from comparisons of atomic frequency standards
Lea, S. N. (2007) · Reports on Progress in Physics · doi:10.1088/0034-4885/70/9/r01 · Cited by 73
Breaking of the equivalence principle in the electromagnetic sector and its cosmological signatures
Hees, A., Minazzoli, O., & Larena, J. (2014) · Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology/Physical review. D. Particles and fields · doi:10.1103/physrevd.90.124064 · Cited by 72
“Today, we have excellent constraints on the variations of the fine structure constant α [4–30], on variations of the weak interaction constant αW [4, 31] and on the variation of the constants of strong interaction [11, 26–28, 32, 33] (for a review of all these tests, see [34]).”
BackgroundMapping the dark energy with varying alpha
Parkinson, D., Bassett, B. A., & Barrow, J. D. (2003) · Physics Letters B · doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2003.10.081 · Cited by 72
Matter Non-conservation in the Universe and Dynamical Dark EnergyPreprint
Harald Fritzsch, A., & Solà, J. (2016) · Cited by 88
Dependence of hadronic properties on quark masses and constraints on their cosmological variation
Flambaum, V. V., & Shuryak, E. V. (2003) · Physical Review D · doi:10.1103/physrevd.67.083507 · Cited by 69
Questioning the equivalence principle
Damour, T. (2001) · Comptes Rendus de l Académie des Sciences - Series IV - Physics-Astrophysics · doi:10.1016/s1296-2147(01)01272-0 · Cited by 67
Self-citationEnhanced effect of quark mass variation in Th229 and limits from Oklo data
Flambaum, V. V., & Wiringa, R. B. (2009) · Physical Review C · doi:10.1103/physrevc.79.034302 · Cited by 67
Quintessence models and the cosmological evolution of α
Lee, S., Olive, K. A., & Pospelov, M. (2004) · Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology/Physical review. D. Particles and fields · doi:10.1103/physrevd.70.083503 · Cited by 65
Measuring the stability of fundamental constants with a network of clocks
Barontini, G., Blackburn, L., Boyer, V., Butuc-Mayer, F., Calmet, X., López-Urrutia, J. R. C., Curtis, E. A., Darquié, B., Dunningham, J., Fitch, N. J., et al. (2022) · EPJ Quantum Technology · doi:10.1140/epjqt/s40507-022-00130-5 · Cited by 76
AN OBSERVATIONAL DETERMINATION OF THE PROTON TO ELECTRON MASS RATIO IN THE EARLY UNIVERSE
Thompson, R. I., Bechtold, J., Black, J. H., Eisenstein, D. J., Fan, X., Kennicutt, R. C., Martins, C. J. A. P., Prochaska, J. X., & Shirley, Y. L. (2009) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1088/0004-637x/703/2/1648 · Cited by 62
“In very rare cases, such as the Oklo mine (Damour & Dyson 1996), there exists a terrestrial laboratory to test for time varying constants.”
Generalized theory of varying alpha
Barrow, J. D., & Lip, S. Z. W. (2012) · Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology/Physical review. D. Particles and fields · doi:10.1103/physrevd.85.023514 · Cited by 61
Matter non-conservation in the universe and dynamical dark energy
Fritzsch, H., & Solà, J. (2012) · Classical and Quantum Gravity · doi:10.1088/0264-9381/29/21/215002 · Cited by 80
A cosmological tale of two varying constants
Barrow, J. D., Magueijo, J., & Sandvik, H. B. (2002) · Physics Letters B · doi:10.1016/s0370-2693(02)02233-5 · Cited by 58
Martins, C. J. A. P., MELCHIORRI, A., Trotta, R., Bean, R., Rocha, G. M., Avelino, P. P., & Viana, P. T. P. (2002) · Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology/Physical review. D. Particles and fields · doi:10.1103/physrevd.66.023505 · Cited by 57
Can a Changing α Explain the Supernovae Results?
Barrow, J. D., & Magueijo, J. (2000) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1086/312572 · Cited by 56
“In separate work, the spacings between quasar (QSO) absorption lines were examined in Keck I data at medium redshifts, z ∼ 1, (Webb et al 99) and compared with those in the laboratory (see also Drinkwater et al 98, Damour and Dyson 96, Shylakhter 76, Barrow 87).”
MethodProbing Quintessence with Time Variation of CouplingsPreprint
WETTERICH, C., & Heidelberg, U. (2002) · Cited by 56
Minazzoli, O., & Hees, A. (2014) · Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology/Physical review. D. Particles and fields · doi:10.1103/physrevd.90.023017 · Cited by 55
Metadata
- Authors
- Damour, T., & Dyson, F.
- Affiliations
- Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR)
- Princeton University (US)
- ORCID
- Damour, Thibault
- Venue
- Nuclear Physics B
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 1996-11
- Volume
- 480
- Issue
- 1-2
- Pages
- 37-54
- ISSN
- 0550-3213 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2074946325
- Cited by
- 374
- References
- 33
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 20 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 9
- FWCI
- 4.39
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Locations
- Nuclear Physics B (publishedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- CERN Document Server (European Organization for Nuclear Research) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Funders
- Ambrose Monell Foundation
- Nuclear Physics
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Nuclear and High Energy Physics › Nuclear physics research studies
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Statistical and Nonlinear Physics › Advanced Mathematical Theories and Applications
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Nuclear and High Energy Physics › Particle physics theoretical and experimental studies
- Keywords
- fine-structure constant variation, alpha variation, rare earth isotopes, isotope shift
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review