CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 96Cosmology and Gravitation TheoriesNoncommutative and Quantum Gravity TheoriesBlack Holes and Theoretical Physics

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Canonical quantization of cosmological perturbations in the one-bubble open universe

Open access
Garriga, Jaume, Montes, Xavier, Sasaki, Misao, Tanaka, Takahiro·1998·Nuclear Physics B
DOI 10.1016/s0550-3213(97)00780-3
Open this paper in CoChat — free accountOpen PDF

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0550-3213(97)00780-3

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The combination of prior and anthropic effects places most observers in spacetime regions where Ω_curv is unobservably small, but gives a reasonable probability of order ten percent to observe Ω_curv ~ 10^-5.

    “The combination of these effects places most observers in spacetime regions in which Ω 0 curv is unobservably small (i.e.below cosmic variance), but at the same time gives a reasonable probability, roughly of order ten percent chance, to observe Ω 0 curv 10 -5 [68,69].”

    From Observable effects of anisotropic bubble nucleation (2010) · cites this paper as [69]

    The Introduction describes an open-inflation bubble model, and Section III discusses quantizing its perturbations; neither addresses the distribution of observers or the probability of observing curvature. Searches for anthropic and prior effects, cosmic variance, Ω_curv ≈ 10^-5, and a ten-percent probability found no passage supporting the attributed claim. Page numbers were not supplied for these passages. (LLM, conf=0.75)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

  • Anthropic selection gives a mass function of Milky-Way mass galaxies approximately independent of Ω_curv for Ω_curv ≪ O(0.1), falling off exponentially for roughly Ω_curv > 0.7.

    “The effect of anthropic selection is most carefully computed in [69], where it is found that the mass function of Milky-Way mass galaxies is approximately independent of Ω curv for Ω curv ≪ O(0.1), and falls off exponentially for roughly Ω curv > 0.7”

    From Observable effects of anisotropic bubble nucleation (2010) · cites this paper as [69]

    The Introduction discusses open-inflation models, and Section IV analyzes the spectrum of gravity waves. Neither those passages nor searches for anthropic selection, the Milky-Way galaxy mass function, and the stated curvature thresholds found a passage addressing the claimed result. Our copy therefore cannot verify that this source computed it. (LLM, conf=0.78)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

  • In the present case, all three measures mentioned (comoving probability, causal patch, and scale-factor cutoff) give similar predictions.

    “however in the present case it turns out that all three measures mentioned above give similar predictions [66,67,68,69].”

    From Observable effects of anisotropic bubble nucleation (2010) · cites this paper as [69]

    The Conclusions and Discussion section says the paper derives reduced actions for scalar and tensor cosmological perturbations. Searches for comoving probability, causal-patch and scale-factor-cutoff measures, and for comparisons of their predictions, found no passage addressing the claim. The citation appears alongside three others, but our copy does not establish this paper's support for the comparison. (LLM, conf=0.75)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 42

  1. Sasaki, 1993, Phys. Lett. B, 317, 510, 10.1016/0370-2693(93)91364-S · DOI
  2. Yamamoto, 1995, Astrophys. J., 455, 412, 10.1086/176588 · DOI · Paper page
  3. Bucher, 1995, 43, 173
  4. Bucher, 1995, Phys. Rev. D, 52, 5538, 10.1103/PhysRevD.52.5538 · DOI
  5. Linde, 1995, Phys. Lett. B, 351, 99, 10.1016/0370-2693(95)00370-Z · DOI
  6. Linde, 1995, Phys. Rev. D, 52, 6789, 10.1103/PhysRevD.52.6789 · DOI
  7. Green, 1997, Phys. Rev. D, 55, 609, 10.1103/PhysRevD.55.609 · DOI
  8. K.M. Gorski, B. Ratra, R. Stompor and N. Sugiyama and A.J. Banday, astro-ph/9608054 · arXiv
  9. K. Ganga, B. Ratra, J.O. Gundersen and N. Sugiyama, astro-ph/9602141, to appear in Astrophys. J. · arXiv
  10. Vilenkin, 1997, Phys. Rev. D, 56, 3238, 10.1103/PhysRevD.56.3238 · DOI
  11. Ratra, 1995, Phys. Rev. D, 52, 1837, 10.1103/PhysRevD.52.1837 · DOI
  12. Yamamoto, 1996, Phys. Rev. D, 54, 5031, 10.1103/PhysRevD.54.5031 · DOI · Paper page
  13. Sasaki, 1996, Phys. Rev. D, 54, 4705, 10.1103/PhysRevD.54.R4705 · DOI
  14. Garriga, 1997, Phys. Rev. D, 56, 2439, 10.1103/PhysRevD.56.2439 · DOI
  15. Garcia-Bellido, 1997, Phys. Rev. D, 55, 4603, 10.1103/PhysRevD.55.4603 · DOI
  16. Garcia-Bellido, 1997, Phys. Rev. D, 55, 7480, 10.1103/PhysRevD.55.7480 · DOI
  17. Cohn, 1996, Phys. Rev. D, 54, 7215, 10.1103/PhysRevD.54.7215 · DOI
  18. Allen, 1994, report No. WISC-MILW-94-TH-21
  19. Tanaka, 1997, Prog. Theor. Phys., 97, 243, 10.1143/PTP.97.243 · DOI
  20. Bucher, 1997, Phys. Rev. D, 55, 7461, 10.1103/PhysRevD.55.7461 · DOI
  21. Sasaki, 1997, Phys. Rev. D, 56, 616, 10.1103/PhysRevD.56.616 · DOI
  22. Garcia-Bellido, 1997, Phys. Rev. D, 56, 3225, 10.1103/PhysRevD.56.3225 · DOI
  23. Hamazaki, 1996, Phys. Rev. D, 53, 2045, 10.1103/PhysRevD.53.2045 · DOI
  24. Garcia-Bellido, 1996, Phys. Rev. D, 54, 2473, 10.1103/PhysRevD.54.2473 · DOI
  25. Garriga, 1996, Phys. Rev. D, 54, 4764, 10.1103/PhysRevD.54.4764 · DOI
  26. Bardeen, 1980, Phys. Rev. D, 22, 1882, 10.1103/PhysRevD.22.1882 · DOI · Paper page
  27. Kodama, 1984, Prog. Theor. Phys. Suppl., 78, 1, 10.1143/PTPS.78.1 · DOI
  28. Stewart, 1990, Class. Quant. Grav., 7, 1169, 10.1088/0264-9381/7/7/013 · DOI
  29. Bruni, 1992, Class. Quant. Grav., 9, 921, 10.1088/0264-9381/9/4/010 · DOI
  30. Mukhanov, 1992, Phys. Rep., 115, 203, 10.1016/0370-1573(92)90044-Z · DOI · Paper page
  31. Sasaki, 1986, Prog. Theor. Phys., 76, 1036, 10.1143/PTP.76.1036 · DOI
  32. Makino, 1991, Prog. Theor. Phys., 86, 103, 10.1143/PTP.86.103 · DOI
  33. Mukhanov, 1988, Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz., 94, 1
  34. Anderegg, 1994, Phys. Lett. B, 331, 30, 10.1016/0370-2693(94)90939-3 · DOI
  35. Tanaka, 1992, Prog. Theor. Phys., 88, 503, 10.1143/PTP.88.503 · DOI
  36. Sasaki, 1995, Phys. Rev. D, 51, 2979, 10.1103/PhysRevD.51.2979 · DOI · Paper page
  37. Faddeev, 1988, Phys. Rev. Lett, 60, 1692, 10.1103/PhysRevLett.60.1692 · DOI
  38. García, 1997, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A, 12, 451, 10.1142/S0217751X97000505 · DOI
  39. Tomita, 1982, Prog. Theor. Phys., 68, 310, 10.1143/PTP.68.310 · DOI
  40. Ishibashi, 1997, Phys. Rev. D, 56, 3446, 10.1103/PhysRevD.56.3446 · DOI
  41. Arnowitt, Deser and Misner, Gravitation: an Introduction to Current Research, The Dynamics of General Relativity (Wiley, New York).
  42. Mukhanov, 1995, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A, 10, 579, 10.1142/S0217751X95000267 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Garriga, J., Montes, X., Sasaki, M., & Tanaka, T.
Affiliations
  • Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona (ES)
  • The University of Osaka (JP)
Corresponding author
  • Garriga, Jaume
  • Montes, Xavier
  • Sasaki, Misao
  • Tanaka, Takahiro
ORCID
Venue
Nuclear Physics B
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1998-03
Volume
513
Issue
1-2
Pages
343-374
ISSN
0550-3213 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1016/s0550-3213(97)00780-3
OpenAlex
W2023483259
Cited by
96
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 2 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 2
FWCI
6.86
Type
journal article
Language
en
Update notices
erratum (1999-06-28)
Open access
Licence
www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)
Locations
  • Nuclear Physics B (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • CERN Document Server (European Organization for Nuclear Research) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Funders
Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Cosmology and Gravitation Theories
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Nuclear and High Energy Physics › Noncommutative and Quantum Gravity Theories
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Nuclear and High Energy Physics › Black Holes and Theoretical Physics
Keywords
cosmological perturbations, open universe, Faddeev-Jackiw method, constrained systems, gauge invariance, scalar perturbations, tensor perturbations, Cauchy surfaces, reflection amplitude, quantum cosmology

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review