Cited by 388Noncommutative and Quantum Gravity TheoriesBlack Holes and Theoretical PhysicsRelativity and Gravitational Theory

Non-perturbative Lorentzian quantum gravity, causality and topology change

Open access
Ambjørn, J., Loll, R.·1998·Nuclear Physics B

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0550-3213(98)00692-0

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The alternative Lorentzian model introduced by Ambjørn and Loll has much nicer properties, including a continuum limit that appears numerically to match a finite-sized, spherical semiclassical configuration.

    “An alternative “Lorentzian” model, introduced by Ambjørn and Loll [16, 9, 12, 10, 180, 13], however, has much nicer properties, including a continuum limit that appears numerically to match a finite-sized, spherical “semiclassical” configuration.”

    From Quantum Gravity in 2 + 1 Dimensions: The Case of a Closed Universe (2005) · cites this paper as [16]

    The Abstract (p. 1) introduces a two-dimensional Lorentzian quantum-gravity model and states that it has a continuum limit. The Conclusions (p. 25) describe that limit but propose numerical simulations as future work; they do not report a numerical match to a finite-sized, spherical semiclassical configuration. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 18

  1. [1][1] J.F. Barbero G.: From Euclidean to Lorentzian general relativity: the real way, Phys. Rev. D 54 (1996) 1492-1499, e-Print Archive: gr-qc/9605066. · arXiv
  2. [2][2] A. Carlini and J. Greensite: Square root actions, metric signature, and the path integral of quantum gravity, Phys. Rev. D 52 (1995) 6947-6964, e-Print Archive: gr-qc/9502023. · arXiv
  3. [3][3] W. Beirl and D.A. Johnston: 2d Lorentzian gravity as 2d Euclidean gravity with Ising spins, preprint TU Vienna, Feb 1996, e-Print Archive: hep-lat/9602009. · arXiv
  4. [13][13] J. Ambjørn and Y. Watabiki: Scaling in quantum gravity, Nucl. Phys. B 445 (1995) 129-144, e-Print Archive: hep-th/9501049. 28 http://arxiv.org/abs/gr-qc/9605066 http://arxiv.org/abs/gr-qc/9502023 http://arxiv.org/abs/hep-lat/9602009 http://arxiv.org/abs/gr-qc/9702025 http://arxiv.org/abs/hep-th/9501049 · arXiv
  5. [14][14] J. Ambjørn, J. Jurkiewicz and Y. Watabiki: On the fractal structure of two-dimensional quantum gravity, Nucl. Phys. B 454 (1995) 313-342, e-Print Archive: hep-lat/9507014; Dynamical triangulations, a gateway to quantum gravity?, J. Math. Phys. 36 (1995) 6299-6339, e-Print Archive: hep-th/9503108. · arXiv
  6. [15][15] H. Aoki, H. Kawai, J. Nishimura and A. Tsuchiya: Operator product expansion in two-dimensional quantum gravity, Nucl. Phys. B 474 (1996) 512-528, e-Print Archive: hep-th/9511117. · arXiv
  7. [16][16] J. Ambjørn, B. Durhuus and T. Jónsson: Quantum Geometry, Cambridge Monographs on Mathematical Physics, Cambridge University Press, Cam- bridge, 1997.
  8. [18][18] R. Nakayama: 2-d quantum gravity in the proper time gauge, Phys. Lett. B 325 (1994) 347-353, e-Print Archive: hep-th/9312158. · arXiv
  9. [19][19] A. Carlini and J. Greensite: Fundamental constants and the problem of time, Phys. Rev. D 52 (1995) 936-960, e-Print Archive: gr-qc/9406044. · arXiv
  10. [22][22] J. Ambjørn, S. Jain and G. Thorleifsson: Baby universes in 2-d quantum grav- ity, Phys. Lett. B 307 (1993) 34-39, e-Print Archive: hep-th/9303149. · arXiv
  11. [23][23] J. Ambjørn, S. Jain, J. Jurkiewicz and C.F. Kristjansen: Observing 4d baby universes in quantum gravity, Phys. Lett. B 305 (1993) 208-213, e-Print Archive: hep-th/9303041. · arXiv
  12. [24][24] J. Louko and R.D. Sorkin: Complex actions in two-dimensional topology change, Class. Quant. Grav. 14 (1997) 179-203, e-Print Archive: gr-qc/9511023. · arXiv
  13. [25][25] N. Ishibashi and H. Kawai: String field theory of noncritical strings, Phys. Lett. B 314 (1993) 190-196, e-Print Archive: hep-th/9307045. · arXiv
  14. [26][26] Y. Watabiki: Construction of noncritical string field theory by transfer matrix formalism in dynamical triangulation, Nucl. Phys. B 441 (1995) 119-166, e- Print Archive: hep-th/9401096. · arXiv
  15. [27][27] V.A. Kazakov: The appearance of matter fields from quantum fluctuations of 2-d gravity, Mod. Phys. Lett. A 4 (1989) 2125. 29 http://arxiv.org/abs/hep-lat/9507014 http://arxiv.org/abs/hep-th/9503108 http://arxiv.org/abs/hep-th/9511117 http://arxiv.org/abs/hep-th/9312158 http://arxiv.org/abs/gr-qc/9406044 http://arxiv.org/abs/hep-th/9204017 http://arxiv.org/abs/hep-th/9204017 http://arxiv.org/abs/hep-th/9303149 http://arxiv.org/abs/hep-th/9303041 http://arxiv.org/abs/gr-qc/9511023 http://arxiv.org/abs/hep-th/9307045 http://arxiv.org/abs/hep-th/9401096 · arXiv
  16. [28][28] H. Kawai, N. Kawamoto, T. Mogami and Y. Watabiki: Transfer matrix formal- ism for two-dimensional quantum gravity and fractal structures of space-time, Phys. Lett. B 306 (1993) 19-26, e-Print Archive: hep-th/9302133. · arXiv
  17. [30][30] N. Ishibashi and H. Kawai: String field theory of c ≤ 1 noncritical strings, Phys. Lett. B 322 (1994) 67-78, e-Print Archive: hep-th/9312047. · arXiv
  18. [32][32] S. Bilke, Z. Burda, A. Krzywicki, B. Petersson, J. Tabaczek and G. Thorleifsson, 4-d simplicial quantum gravity interacting with gauge matter fields, Phys. Lett. B 418 (1998) 266-272, e-Print Archive: hep-lat/9710077. 30 http://arxiv.org/abs/hep-th/9302133 http://arxiv.org/abs/hep-th/9312047 http://arxiv.org/abs/hep-th/9503006 http://arxiv.org/abs/gr-qc/9805049 http://arxiv.org/abs/hep-lat/9710077 · arXiv

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ambjørn, J., & Loll, R.
Affiliations
Max Planck Society (DE)
Corresponding author
Loll, R.
Venue
Nuclear Physics B
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1998-12
Volume
536
Issue
1-2
Pages
407-434
ISSN
0550-3213 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2015613285
Cited by
388
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 24 · 2024: 18 · 2023: 25 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 18 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 23 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 14 · 2014: 18 · 2013: 22 · 2012: 21
FWCI
8.75
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nuclear Physics B (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • CERN Document Server (European Organization for Nuclear Research) (submittedVersion)
  • Utrecht University Repository (Utrecht University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Max Planck Institute for Plasma Physics (submittedVersion)
  • Max Planck Digital Library (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Research at the University of Copenhagen (University of Copenhagen) (submittedVersion)
  • MPG.PuRe (Max Planck Society) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Funders
Universitat de Barcelona
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Statistical and Nonlinear Physics › Noncommutative and Quantum Gravity Theories
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Nuclear and High Energy Physics › Black Holes and Theoretical Physics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Relativity and Gravitational Theory
Keywords
Lorentzian quantum gravity, two-dimensional quantum gravity, lattice model, causal structure, topology change, matrix models, Liouville theory, continuum limit, exact solutions

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review