The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A comparison of T-wave alternans, signal averaged electrocardiography and programmed ventricular stimulation for arrhythmia risk stratification
Open accessAbstract
OBJECTIVES The goal of this study was to compare T-wave alternans (TWA), signal-averaged electrocardiography (SAECG) and programmed ventricular stimulation (EPS) for arrhythmia risk stratification in patients undergoing electrophysiology study. BACKGROUND Accurate identification of patients at increased risk for sustained ventricular arrhythmias is critical to prevent sudden cardiac death. T-wave alternans is a heart rate dependent measure of repolarization that correlates with arrhythmia vulnerability in animal and human studies. Signal-averaged electrocardiography and EPS are more established tests used for risk stratification. METHODS This was a prospective, multicenter trial of 313 patients in sinus rhythm who were undergoing electrophysiologic study. T-wave alternans, assessed with bicycle ergometry, and SAECG were measured before EPS. The primary end point was sudden cardiac death, sustained ventricular tachycardia, ventricular fibrillation or appropriate implantable defibrillator (ICD) therapy, and the secondary end point was any of these arrhythmias or all-cause mortality. RESULTS Kaplan-Meier survival analysis of the primary end point showed that TWA predicted events with a relative risk of 10.9, EPS had a relative risk of 7.1 and SAECG had a relative risk of 4.5. The relative risks for the secondary end point were 13.9, 4.7 and 3.3, respectively (p < 0.05). Multivariate analysis of 11 clinical parameters identified only TWA and EPS as independent predictors of events. In the prespecified subgroup with known or suspected ventricular arrhythmias, TWA predicted primary end points with a relative risk of 6.1 and secondary end points with a relative risk of 8.0. CONCLUSIONS T-wave alternans is a strong independent predictor of spontaneous ventricular arrhythmias or death. It performed as well as programmed stimulation and better than SAECG in risk stratifying patients for life-threatening arrhythmias.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Moss, A. J., Hall, W. J., Cannom, D. S., Daubert, J. P., Higgins, S. L., Klein, H., Levine, J. H., Saksena, S., Waldo, A. L., Wilber, D., et al. (1996) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm199612263352601 · Cited by 4,165
Self-citationA Randomized Study of the Prevention of Sudden Death in Patients with Coronary Artery Disease
Buxton, A. E., Lee, K. L., Fisher, J. D., Josephson, M. E., Prystowsky, E. N., & Hafley, G. (1999) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm199912163412503 · Cited by 2,489 · cited 1×
“Recently, programmed ventricular stimulation during electrophysiology (EPS) testing (6,7), but not signal averaged electrocardiography (SAECG) (8), identified a cohort with left ventricular dysfunction who had improved survival with implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) placement.”
Background
Cited by
Goldberger, J. J., Cain, M. E., Hohnloser, S. H., Kadish, A. H., Knight, B. P., Lauer, M. S., Maron, B. J., Page, R. L., Passman, R. S., Siscovick, D., et al. (2008) · Circulation · doi:10.1161/circulationaha.107.189375 · Cited by 1,450
Goldberger, J. J., Cain, M. E., Hohnloser, S. H., Kadish, A. H., Knight, B. P., Lauer, M. S., Maron, B. J., Page, R. L., Passman, R. S., Siscovick, D., et al. (2008) · Journal of the American College of Cardiology · doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2008.05.003 · Cited by 428
Verrier (2011) · doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2011.06.029 · Cited by 421
Noninvasive Risk Assessment Early After a Myocardial Infarction
Exner, D. V., Kavanagh, K. M., Slawnych, M. P., Mitchell, L. B., Ramadan, D., Aggarwal, S. G., Noullett, C., Van Schaik, A., Mitchell, R. T., Shibata, M. A., et al. (2007) · Journal of the American College of Cardiology · doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2007.08.042 · Cited by 348
Nearing, B. D., & Verrier, R. L. (2002) · Journal of Applied Physiology · doi:10.1152/japplphysiol.00592.2001 · Cited by 347
Metadata
- Authors
- Gold, M. R., Bloomfield, D. M., Anderson, K. P., El-Sherif, N. E., Wilber, D. J., Groh, W. J., Estes, N. A. M., Kaufman, E. S., Greenberg, M. L., & Rosenbaum, D. S.
- Venue
- Journal of the American College of Cardiology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2000-12
- Volume
- 36
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 2247-2253
- ISSN
- 0735-1097 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2065246793
- Cited by
- 275
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 13.16
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A comparison of T-wave alternans, signal averaged electrocardiography and programmed ventricular stimulation for arrhythmia risk stratification. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/s0735-1097(00)01017-2
- The paper
- Gold, M. R., Bloomfield, D. M., Anderson, K. P., El-Sherif, N. E., Wilber, D. J., Groh, W. J., Estes, N. A. M., Kaufman, E. S., Greenberg, M. L., & Rosenbaum, D. S. (2000). A comparison of T-wave alternans, signal averaged electrocardiography and programmed ventricular stimulation for arrhythmia risk stratification. Journal of the American College of Cardiology. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0735-1097(00)01017-2
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.