Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 744

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Standardization of M-mode echocardiographic left ventricular anatomic measurements

Open access
Devereux, Richard B., Lutas, Elizabeth M., Casale, Paul N., Kligfield, Paul, Eisenberg, Richard R., Hammond, Isaac W., Miller, David H., Reis, Gregg, Alderman, Michael H., Laragh, John H.·1984·Journal of the American College of Cardiology

Abstract

To improve standardization of echocardiographic left ventricular anatomic measurements, echographic left ventricular dimensions and mass were related to body size indexes, sex, age and blood pressure. Independent normal populations comprised 92 hospital-based subjects (64 women, 28 men) and 133 subjects from a population sample (55 women, 78 men). All measurements of chamber size, wall thickness and mass differed between men and women in both series (p less than 0.01 to p less than 0.001). Left ventricular mass was related most closely to body surface area among measurements of body size (r = 0.37, p less than 0.01 to r = 0.57, p less than 0.001) in all four groups. Indexation by body surface area eliminated sex differences in wall thicknesses and internal dimension, but a significant sex difference in left ventricular mass index persisted (89 +/- 21 g/m2 in men versus 69 + 19 g/m2 in women in the entire series, p less than 0.0001). The 97th percentile of left ventricular mass index was identical in both groups of men (136 and 132 g/m2) and women (112 and 109 g/m2). A highly significant difference in lean body mass, estimated from 24 hour urine creatine excretion, was observed between men and women (58 +/- 15 versus 40 +/- 13 kg, p less than 0.001) and no sex difference existed in left ventricular mass indexed by lean body mass (3.4 +/- 1.3 versus 3.5 +/- 1.5 g/kg). Weak correlations were observed between left ventricular mass/lean body mass and systolic or diastolic blood pressure (r = 0.25, p less than 0.05 and r = 0.28, p less than 0.01, respectively) but not age (18 to 72 years).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0735-1097(84)80141-2

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 744

Metadata

Authors
Devereux, R. B., Lutas, E. M., Casale, P. N., Kligfield, P., Eisenberg, R. R., Hammond, I. W., Miller, D. H., Reis, G., Alderman, M. H., & Laragh, J. H.
Venue
Journal of the American College of Cardiology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1984-12
Volume
4
Issue
6
Pages
1222-1230
ISSN
0735-1097 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1975925766
Cited by
744
References
0
FWCI
8.45
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Standardization of M-mode echocardiographic left ventricular anatomic measurements. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/s0735-1097(84)80141-2
The paper
Devereux, R. B., Lutas, E. M., Casale, P. N., Kligfield, P., Eisenberg, R. R., Hammond, I. W., Miller, D. H., Reis, G., Alderman, M. H., & Laragh, J. H. (1984). Standardization of M-mode echocardiographic left ventricular anatomic measurements. Journal of the American College of Cardiology. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0735-1097(84)80141-2

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.