The DOI matches its Crossref record.
A review of issues related to measuring colonization of plant roots by bacteria
Abstract
Root colonization by introduced bacteria is an important step in the interaction of beneficial bacteria with the host plant. Investigators attempting to measure root colonization by bacteria must face several issues. A clear concept or definition of root colonization should be stated in each research summary, as several different definitions have been proposed. We consider true root colonists to be those bacteria that colonize roots in competitive conditions, i.e., natural field soils. Different methods of processing root samples are required if one is measuring external root colonization alone, internal colonization alone, or both. Given that most beneficial bacterial strains currently under investigation as root colonists are members of taxa naturally found in soils, a marking system is required to differentiate the introduced strain from members of the indigenous rhizosphere community. Spontaneous antibiotic resistance, immunological approaches, and foreign DNA sequences are among the marking systems that have been used and each has some possible advantages and disadvantages. More research is needed in the development and comparison of marking systems. The design of experiments to measure root colonization should take into account several statistical issues. One must decide what constitutes the sample unit for each replication of a given treatment, e.g., whole root systems or root segments. Consideration should also be given to how best to express the estimated population of root colonists (e.g., cfu/g fresh or dry weight root, cfu/cm root, or cfu/surface area root). Statistical analysis by standard analysis of variance tests should be used whenever possible to separate treatment means of colonization levels; however, one must determine that the underlying assumptions of these tests are correct for each experiment. Finally, in quantification of populations on roots, one will almost certainly encounter replications with no bacteria, i.e., zeros. There are several options for how to calculate treatment means when one or more replications is a zero, and the implications of these options are discussed. Key words: bioluminescence, genetic markers, plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria, rhizosphere bacteria, root, colonization.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Soil beneficial bacteria and their role in plant growth promotion: a review
Hayat, R., Ali, S., Amara, U., Khalid, R., & Ahmed, I. (2010) · Annals of Microbiology · doi:10.1007/s13213-010-0117-1 · Cited by 2,064
Plant-rhizobacteria interactions alleviate abiotic stress conditions
DIMKPA, C., WEINAND, T., & ASCH, F. (2009) · Plant, Cell & Environment · doi:10.1111/j.1365-3040.2009.02028.x · Cited by 963
Recent advances in BNF with non-legume plants
Baldani, J., Caruso, L., Baldani, V. L. D., Goi, S. R., & Döbereiner, J. (1997) · Soil Biology and Biochemistry · doi:10.1016/s0038-0717(96)00218-0 · Cited by 406
Infection and Colonization of Sugar Cane and Other Graminaceous Plants by Endophytic Diazotrophs
James, E. K. (1998) · Critical Reviews in Plant Sciences · doi:10.1016/s0735-2689(98)00357-8 · Cited by 375
Mahaffee, W. F., & Kloepper, J. W. (1997) · Microbial Ecology · doi:10.1007/s002489900050 · Cited by 254
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Kloepper, J. W., & Beauchamp, C. J.
- Venue
- Canadian Journal of Microbiology
- Publisher
- Canadian Science Publishing
- Published
- 1992-12-01
- Volume
- 38
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 1219-1232
- ISSN
- 0008-4166 (ISSN-L)
- 1480-3275
- OpenAlex
- W2021088574
- Cited by
- 393
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 7.28
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A review of issues related to measuring colonization of plant roots by bacteria. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1139/m92-202
- The paper
- Kloepper, J. W., & Beauchamp, C. J. (1992). A review of issues related to measuring colonization of plant roots by bacteria. Canadian Journal of Microbiology. https://doi.org/10.1139/m92-202
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.