Cited by 55Outdoor and Experiential EducationSubstance Abuse Treatment and OutcomesRecreation, Leisure, Wilderness Management

Effects of a Therapeutic Camping Program on Addiction Recovery

Open access
Bennett, Larry W., Cardone, Samuel, Jarczyk, John·1998·Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment

Abstract

A group of 13 men and women in substance abuse treatment participated in a 3-day residential program experience based on integrated principles from adventure therapy, therapeutic camping, and relapse prevention. The experimental group is compared to a group of 18 men and women who received the usual and customary relapse prevention program. Both groups completed pre- and postintervention questionnaires. There were no differences in drinking-related locus of control, stress, or problem-solving between groups at postinterview, but there were significant improvements in autonomic arousal, frequency of negative thoughts, and alcohol craving. Participants in both groups were interviewed 10 months after the 3-day intervention. Considering individuals who were unreachable as relapsed, the 10-month follow-up relapse rate was 31% for the experimental group and 58% for the comparison group. These results add to the limited body of research supporting outdoor adventure and therapeutic camping experiences integrated with traditional relapse prevention activities as an adjunct to substance abuse treatment.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0740-5472(97)00222-5

Cites

28 of 28 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [11]11. Gillis, H.L., & Bonney, W.C. (1986). Group counseling with couples and families. Journal for Specialists in Group Work, 11 , 213-220.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bennett, L. W., Cardone, S., & Jarczyk, J.
Affiliations
  • University of Illinois Chicago (US)
  • Haymarket Center (US)
Venue
Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1998-09
Volume
15
Issue
5
Pages
469-474
ISSN
0740-5472 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2061784951
Cited by
55
References
26
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 5 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 3
FWCI
0.70
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Outdoor and Experiential Education
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Recreation, Leisure, Wilderness Management
Keywords
adventure therapy, relapse prevention, addiction treatment, addiction recovery, alcohol craving, autonomic arousal, negative thinking, relapse rate, adjunct treatment
MeSH terms
Adult, Alcohol Drinking, Camping, Female, Health Promotion, Humans, Male, Neuropsychological Tests, Problem Solving, Relaxation Therapy, Stress, Psychological, Substance-Related Disorders, Secondary Prevention

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review