Cited by 173Substance Abuse Treatment and OutcomesAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesOpioid Use Disorder Treatment

Prospective and retrospective reports of mood states before relapse to substance use.

Hodgins, David C., el-Guebaly, Nady, Armstrong, Susan·1995·Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology

Abstract

In a prospective design, it was predicted that the role of negative mood in precipitating relapses and crises among alcohol-dependent participants would be greater when assessed with retrospective mood ratings than when assessed by prospective mood ratings because of participants' attributional biases. This hypothesis was not supported. Support was found, however, for a relationship between negative bias and the amount of negative mood assessed at the time the retrospective report was given. As has been previously found, the most frequent precipitant of relapses and crises in this study was negative emotional states. Female participants were more likely to report interpersonal and less likely to report intrapersonal determinants than male participants. Minor relapses were more likely to be precipitated by social pressure and less likely to be related to negative emotions than major relapses.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/0022-006x.63.3.400

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Negative emotional states and exposure to social pressure are high-risk situations for relapse to alcohol and other substance use, whether measured prospectively or retrospectively, a finding that later studies continue to replicate.

    “studies continue to replicate the essential ndings of our early studies of relapse triggers: that contextual factors such as the experience of negative-emotional states and exposure to social pressure constitute high-risk situations for relapse to alcohol and substance use (e.g. Hodgins, el-Guebaly & Armstrong, 1995), whether assessed prospectively or retrospectively.”

    From Taxonomy of high‐risk situations for alcohol relapse: evolution and development of a (1996) · cites this paper as Hodgins, el-Guebaly & Armstrong, 1995

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hodgins, D. C., el-Guebaly, N., & Armstrong, S.
Affiliations
University of Calgary (CA)
Venue
Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology
Published
1995
Volume
63
Issue
3
Pages
400-407
ISSN
  • 0022-006X (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-2117
OpenAlex
W1981805502
Cited by
173
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 14 · 2012: 11
FWCI
7.24
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Opioid Use Disorder Treatment
Keywords
alcoholism, relapse, negative mood, attribution bias, negative emotions, social pressure, gender differences
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Affect, Aged, Alcohol Drinking, Alcoholism, Female, Gender Identity, Humans, Internal-External Control, Male, Middle Aged, Personality Assessment, Prospective Studies, Psychometrics, Recurrence, Retrospective Studies, Bias

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review