CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 453Smoking Behavior and CessationSubstance Abuse Treatment and OutcomesHealth Promotion and Cardiovascular Prevention

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 440 of the 440 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Reviews of evidence regarding interventions to reduce tobacco use and exposure to environmental tobacco smoke11The names and affiliations of the Task Force members are listed in the front of this supplement and at www.thecommunityguide.org.

Hopkins, David P, Briss, Peter A, Ricard, Connie J, Husten, Corinne G, Carande-Kulis, Vilma G, Fielding, Jonathan E, Alao, Mary O, McKenna, Jeffrey W, Sharp, Donald J, Harris, Jeffrey R, Woollery, Trevor A, Harris, Kate W·2001·American Journal of Preventive Medicine
DOI 10.1016/s0749-3797(00)00297-x
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

This report presents the results of systematic reviews of effectiveness, applicability, other effects, economic evaluations, and barriers to use of selected population-based interventions intended to reduce tobacco use and exposure to environmental tobacco smoke. The related systematic reviews are linked by a common conceptual approach. These reviews form the basis of recommendations by the Task Force on Community Preventive Services (TFCPS) regarding the use of these selected interventions. The TFCPS recommendations are presented on page 67 of this supplement.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0749-3797(00)00297-x

Cites

440 of 440 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Items 201–400 of 440

Research works printed but not linked: 20

  1. Burns DM, Shanks TG, Major JM, Gower KB, Shopland DR. Restrictions on smoking in the workplace. Smoking and Tobacco Control Monograph 12. Bethesda, MD: National Institutes of Health, National Cancer Institute. In press.
  2. Rigotti, 1986, The impact of banning smoking on a hospital ward, Clin Res, 34, 833A
  3. Ohsfeldt, 1997, Effects of tobacco excise taxes on the use of smokeless tobacco products in the USA, Health Educ, 6, 525
  4. Meister, 1998, Designing an effective statewide tobacco control program—Arizona, Cancer, 83, 2728, 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0142(19981215)83:12A+<2728::AID-CNCR13>3.0.CO;2-3 · DOI
  5. Siegel, 2000, The impact of an antismoking media campaign on progressions to established smoking, Am J Public Health, 90, 1
  6. Vartiainen, 1983, Effect of two years of educational intervention on adolescent smoking, Bull World Health Organ, 61, 529
  7. Mummery, 1996, Tobacco pricing, taxation, consumption and revenue, Can J Public Health, 87, 314
  8. Marin, 1995, Effectiveness of disseminating culturally appropriate smoking-cessation information, J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr, 18, 155
  9. Puska, 1985, Planned use of mass media in national health promotion, Can J Public Health, 76, 336
  10. Millar, 1987, Time to quit, Can J Public Health, 78, 109
  11. Ryan, 1990, Smoking cessation in Nova Scotia, Can J Public Health, 81, 166
  12. Leinweber, 1994, Community smoking cessation contests, Can J Public Health, 85, 95
  13. Hall, 1996, Teaching smoking cessation to family practice residents, Fam Med, 28, 331
  14. Quirk, 1991, Training family practice and internal medicine residents to counsel patients who smoke, Fam Med, 23, 108
  15. Kottke, 1992, A controlled trial to integrate smoking cessation advice into primary care practice, J Fam Pract, 34, 701
  16. Windsor, 1990, Smoking cessation and pregnancy intervention trial, Prog Clin Biol Res, 339, 107
  17. Lichtenstein, 1992, Patient referral to a smoking cessation program, J Fam Pract, 34, 739
  18. Cox, 1990, Nicotine gum, J Fam Pract, 31, 278
  19. Sofian, 1995, Telephone smoking cessation intervention, HMO Pract, 9, 144
  20. Croghan, 1997, Cost-effectiveness of treating nicotine dependence, Mayo Clin Proc, 72, 917, 10.1016/S0025-6196(11)63361-2 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 453

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Hopkins, D. P., Briss, P. A., Ricard, C. J., Husten, C. G., Carande-Kulis, V. G., Fielding, J. E., Alao, M. O., McKenna, J. W., Sharp, D. J., Harris, J. R., Woollery, T. A., & Harris, K. W.
Affiliations
  • Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (US)
  • University of California, Los Angeles (US)
Corresponding author
Hopkins, David P
ORCID
Venue
American Journal of Preventive Medicine
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2001-02
Volume
20
Issue
2
Pages
16-66
ISSN
0749-3797 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1016/s0749-3797(00)00297-x
OpenAlex
W2171599218
Cited by
453
References
440
Citations by year
2024: 1 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 14 · 2013: 21 · 2012: 30
FWCI
2.80
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)
Locations
  • American Journal of Preventive Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Smoking Behavior and Cessation
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Health Promotion and Cardiovascular Prevention
Keywords
tobacco use reduction, environmental tobacco smoke, passive smoking, population-level interventions, intervention effectiveness, applicability, economic evaluation, implementation barriers, community preventive services, evidence-based recommendations
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Community Health Services, Humans, Preventive Health Services, Tobacco Smoke Pollution, United States, Smoking Cessation, Practice Guidelines as Topic, Evidence-Based Medicine

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review