Cited by 181Health Policy Implementation ScienceBehavioral Health and InterventionsHealth Sciences Research and Education

Behavior change intervention research in healthcare settings

Glasgow, Russell E, Bull, Sheana S, Gillette, Cynthia, Klesges, Lisa M, Dzewaltowski, David A·2002·American Journal of Preventive Medicine

Abstract

Background Information to judge both the internal and external validity of health behavior research conducted in healthcare settings is vital to translate research findings to practice. This paper reviews the extent to which this research has reported on elements of internal and external validity, with emphasis on the extent to which research has been conducted in representative settings with representative populations.Methods A comprehensive review was conducted of controlled interventions for dietary change, physical activity, or smoking cessation conducted in healthcare settings and published in 12 leading health behavior journals between 1996 and 2000. Using the RE-AIM (reach, effectiveness, adoption, implementation, maintenance) framework, the characteristics and results of these studies were summarized to document the extent to which intervention reach, adoption, implementation, and maintenance were reported and what has been learned about each of these dimensions.Results A total of 36 studies qualified for review. Participation rates among eligible patients were reported in 69% of studies and were generally quite high; in contrast, only 30% of studies reported on participation rates among either healthcare settings or providers. Implementation data were reported in 77% of the studies and these rates were generally high, with the caveat that intervention was often delivered by paid research staff. Long-term maintenance results were reported very consistently at the individual level, but program continuation was almost never reported at the setting level.Conclusions We conclude that a much stronger emphasis needs to be placed on the representativeness of providers and settings that are studied. Examples of how this can be done and recommendations for future research are provided.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0749-3797(02)00437-3

Cites

30 of 30 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Glasgow, R. E., Bull, S. S., Gillette, C., Klesges, L. M., & Dzewaltowski, D. A.
Affiliations
  • University of Tennessee Health Science Center (US)
  • Kansas State University (US)
Corresponding author
Glasgow, Russell E
Venue
American Journal of Preventive Medicine
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2002-07
Volume
23
Issue
1
Pages
62-69
ISSN
0749-3797 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2045982732
Cited by
181
References
30
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 3 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 14
FWCI
24.04
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • American Journal of Preventive Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health Policy Implementation Science
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Behavioral Health and Interventions
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health Sciences Research and Education
Keywords
behaviour change interventions, healthcare settings, internal validity, generalizability, RE-AIM framework, intervention reach, intervention adoption, intervention implementation, intervention maintenance, dietary change, physical activity, smoking cessation, research generalizability
MeSH terms
Physical Exertion, Feeding Behavior, Health Facilities, Humans, Review Literature as Topic, Reproducibility of Results, Health Behavior, Smoking Cessation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review