Cited by 308Health Policy Implementation ScienceHealth and Medical Research ImpactsStatistical Methods in Clinical Trials

Practical Clinical Trials for Translating Research to Practice: Design and Measurement Recommendations

Glasgow, Russell E., Magid, David J., Beck, Arne, Ritzwoller, Debra, Estabrooks, Paul A.·2005·Medical Care

Abstract

RATIONALE: There is a pressing need for practical clinical trials (PCTs) that are more relevant to clinicians and decision-makers, but many are unaware of these trials. Furthermore, such trials can be challenging to conduct and to report. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to build on the seminal paper by Tunis et al (Practical clinical trials. Increasing the value of clinical research for decision making in clinical and health policy. JAMA. 2003;290:1624-1632.) and to provide recommendations and examples of how practical clinical trials can be conducted and the results reported to enhance external validity without sacrificing internal validity. KEY ISSUES: We discuss evaluating practical intervention options, alternative research designs, representativeness of samples participating at both the patient and the setting/clinician level, and the need for multiple outcomes to address clinical and policy implications. CONCLUSIONS: We provide a set of specific recommendations for issues to be reported in PCTs to increase their relevance to clinicians and policymakers, and to help reduce the gap between research and practice.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/01.mlr.0000163645.41407.09

Cites

49 of 49 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • D&I research explicitly attends to external validity, whereas most randomized efficacy and effectiveness trials mainly emphasize internal validity.

    “Dissemination and implementation research pays explicit (although not exclusive) attention to external validity, in contrast to the main emphasis on internal validity in most randomized efficacy and effectiveness trials (20, 48, 52).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Glasgow, R. E., Magid, D. J., Beck, A., Ritzwoller, D., & Estabrooks, P. A.
Affiliations
Kaiser Permanente (US)
Venue
Medical Care
Published
2005-06
Volume
43
Issue
6
Pages
551-557
ISSN
0025-7079 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2079257641
Cited by
308
References
49
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 13 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 18 · 2014: 25 · 2013: 22 · 2012: 27
FWCI
45.59
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Medical Care (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Kaiser Permanente
  • Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (HS-10123)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health Policy Implementation Science
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Health and Medical Research Impacts
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistical Methods in Clinical Trials
Keywords
research-practice gap, generalizability, internal validity, research design, sample representativeness, multiple outcomes, clinical decision-making, health policy
MeSH terms
Clinical Trials as Topic, Decision Making, Humans, Research Design, Reproducibility of Results, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic, Treatment Outcome, Evidence-Based Medicine

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review