Cited by 35Substance Abuse Treatment and OutcomesHistorical and Modern Theater StudiesOpioid Use Disorder Treatment

Cognitive functioning and length of abstinence in polysubstance dependent men

Medina, K·2004·Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology

Abstract

To date, there are few large-scale studies that have examined the relationship between duration of abstinence and cognitive functioning in polysubstance-dependent individuals. Existing large-scale studies of polysubstance abusers have reported only minimal recovery of cognitive functioning with abstinence [Arch. Gen. Psychiatry 35 (1978) 1063]. The goal of this study is to test whether length of abstinence (1 day and 14 months) is related to cognitive ability in a large cross-sectional sample of men recovering from dependence on at least two drugs (N = 207). A series of Poisson and linear regressions were run to test whether length of abstinence is associated with neuropsychological performance while controlling for demographic variables, raw Vocabulary score, drug use, and dependency. The primary finding is that increasing length of abstinence was not statistically associated with superior neuropsychological ability. This suggests that the abuse of multiple substances potentially produces long-lasting neuropsychological impairment with minimal recovery of functioning over a 1-year period.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0887-6177(03)00043-x

Cites

30 of 30 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • These impairments should improve over time and show at least a minimal recovery within one year.

    “These impairments should improve over time and show at least a minimal recovery within one year (Medina et al., 2004; Salo et al., 2009).”

    From Predictive coding in neuropsychiatric disorders: a systematic transdiagnostic review. (2025) · cites this paper as Medina et al., 2004

    The Discussion reports no significant relationship between length of abstinence and cognitive performance in polysubstance-dependent men during the first year. It concludes that there may be minimal or no recovery in that period, contrary to the claimed expectation of at least minimal recovery. (LLM, conf=0.90)

    Checked by a reasoning model — may be wrong.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

3 of the 33 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Defillippis, N. A., McCampbell, E., & Rogers, P. (1979). Development of a booklet form of the category test: Normative and validity data. Journal of Clinical Neuropsychology, 1, 339-342.
  2. Robins, L. N., Helzer, J. E., Przybeck, T. R., & Regier, D. A. (1988). Alcohol disorders in the community: A report from the Epidemiologic Catchment Area. In R.M. Rose (Ed.), Alcoholism: Origins and outcomes (pp. 15-29). New York: Raven Press.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Medina, K.
Affiliations
University of Cincinnati (US)
Corresponding author
Medina, K
Venue
Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology
Published
2004-03
Volume
19
Issue
2
Pages
245-258
ISSN
0887-6177 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1998646669
Cited by
34
References
33
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 5 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 1
FWCI
0.94
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (5r29da009650-06)
  • National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism (K02AA000319, K02AA00319)
  • National Institute on Drug Abuse (R29DA09650)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Historical and Modern Theater Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Opioid Use Disorder Treatment
Keywords
polysubstance dependence, cognitive function, neuropsychological performance, substance use disorders, men, addiction recovery
MeSH terms
Adult, Attention, Cognition, Cross-Sectional Studies, Humans, Inhibition, Psychological, Male, Memory, Middle Aged, Neuropsychological Tests, Psychomotor Performance, Thinking, Time Factors, Substance-Related Disorders, Recovery of Function

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review