Cited by 112Hemodynamic Monitoring and TherapyVascular Procedures and ComplicationsCentral Venous Catheters and Hemodialysis

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 80 of the 81 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Complications of invasive monitoring

Bowdle, T.Andrew·2002·Anesthesiology Clinics of North America

Abstract

Invasive monitoring in anesthesiology is relatively safe. Arterial catheterization in particular has an extremely low rate of serious complications. Radial, brachial, and femoral artery catheterization sites appear to have similar and low complication rates. CVP and PA catheters are more dangerous and entail potentially fatal complications. The most troublesome complication with CVP catheters is perforation of the heart or cava, which should be avoidable under most circumstances if care is taken to position the catheter properly, outside the heart. Chest radiography should be used to specifically ascertain that the catheter is not in a dangerous location. The most troublesome complication with PA catheters is perforation of the pulmonary artery. This is probably a sporadic problem, and it is not necessarily avoidable by adherence to particular techniques. It should be assumed that hemoptysis in a patient with a PA catheter is caused by perforation of the pulmonary artery until proven otherwise, and it should be treated aggressively.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0889-8537(02)00004-4

Cites

80 of 80 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 81 references

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Welliver, 2001, Thoracic duct cannulation during central venous catheterization: a case report, Am J Anesthesiol, 28, 199
  2. Bowdle, 1996, Complications from placement of central venous catheters: importance of the chest x-ray, American Society of Anesthesiologists Newletter, 60, 22

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 101–112 of 112

Metadata

Authors
Bowdle, T. A.
Venue
Anesthesiology Clinics of North America
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2002-09
Volume
20
Issue
3
Pages
571-588
ISSN
0889-8537 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2119404588
Cited by
112
References
81
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 5
FWCI
1.04
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Anesthesiology Clinics of North America (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Hemodynamic Monitoring and Therapy
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Vascular Procedures and Complications
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine › Central Venous Catheters and Hemodialysis
Keywords
invasive hemodynamic monitoring, arterial catheterization complications, central venous pressure catheter, pulmonary artery catheter, cardiac perforation, pulmonary artery perforation, hemoptysis, catheter positioning, chest radiography
MeSH terms
Catheterization, Catheterization, Central Venous, Catheterization, Swan-Ganz, Equipment Failure, Humans, Monitoring, Intraoperative

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review