Cited by 48Meta-analysis and systematic reviewsStatistical Methods in EpidemiologyAdvanced Causal Inference Techniques

Sources of heterogeneity in the meta-analysis of observational studies The example of SIDS and sleeping position

Open access
Dwyer, Terence, Couper, David, Walter, Stephen D·2001·Journal of Clinical Epidemiology

Abstract

The study objective was to provide an example of how risk estimates might vary across studies of observational design, even when a causal association is present and to explore the possible sources of such variation. A meta-analysis of studies on the association between prone sleeping position and sudden infant death syndrome (SIDS) is used to illustrate how risk estimates might vary across studies. Data used were reported case-control studies of the association between sleeping position and SIDS that were published between 1970 and 1994. If the pooled odds ratio had been relied on to assess the association between sleeping position and SIDS without an accompanying examination of the reasons for heterogeneity, important insights into the causal significance of the relationship may have been lost. In meta-analyses of observational studies it is important to investigate the reasons for heterogeneity across studies.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0895-4356(00)00313-9

Cites

44 of 44 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Dwyer, T., Couper, D., & Walter, S. D.
Affiliations
  • University of Tasmania (AU)
  • University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US)
  • McMaster University Medical Centre (CA)
Corresponding author
Dwyer, Terence
Venue
Journal of Clinical Epidemiology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2001-05
Volume
54
Issue
5
Pages
440-447
ISSN
0895-4356 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1993828216
Cited by
48
References
44
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 2 · 2012: 2
FWCI
0.33
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Clinical Epidemiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • eCite Digital Repository (University of Tasmania) (submittedVersion)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty › Meta-analysis and systematic reviews
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistical Methods in Epidemiology
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Advanced Causal Inference Techniques
Keywords
heterogeneity, sudden infant death syndrome, prone sleeping, case-control study, odds ratio, risk estimates, causal inference, research design
MeSH terms
Humans, Infant, Newborn, Risk Factors, Sleep, Sudden Infant Death, Bias, Confounding Factors, Epidemiologic, Odds Ratio, Case-Control Studies, Prone Position

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review