Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 347

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 100 of the 100 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The Evolution and Physiology of Human Color Vision

Open access
Nathans, Jeremy·1999·Neuron

Abstract

Nothing in biology makes sense except in light of evolution.—T. Dobzhansky Color vision is the process by which an organism extracts information regarding the wavelength composition of a visual stimulus (Figure 1). In its simplest form—exemplified by the wavelength-dependent phototactic responses of halobacteria—color vision is based on the relative abundances of two isoforms of a sensory pigment (25Hoff W.D Jung K.H Spudich J.L Molecular mechanism of photosignaling by archaeal sensory rhodopsins.Annu. Rev. Biophys. Biomol. Struct. 1997; 26: 223-258Crossref PubMed Scopus (284) Google Scholar). One isoform preferentially absorbs long wavelength light and mediates a photoattractant response, and the second isoform preferentially absorbs short wavelength light and mediates a photorepellant response. Light absorption photoconverts the first isoform into the second, and the second into the first. Thus, the steady-state ratio of pigment isoforms provides a measure of the spectral composition of the ambient light. The halobacterial system contains the two cardinal elements of every color vision system: (1) two or more sensory pigments with different spectral sensitivities (although in most organisms these are distinct chromoproteins rather than isoforms of a single chromoprotein), and (2) a mechanism for monitoring the relative number of photons captured by the different pigments. In higher eukaryotes, this system has evolved so that, in general, each pigment resides within a distinct class of photoreceptor cells, and therefore the ratios of photoexcitation of the different pigments can be determined by assessing the ratios of activation of different photoreceptor cells. Visual pigments are G protein–coupled receptors in which a seven-transmembrane segment protein is covalently linked to a chromophore, 11-cis retinal. Studies of the visual pigment complement and color vision ability of different vertebrates reveal an ancient and nearly universal color vision system in which one visual pigment has an absorption maximum at <500 nm and a second visual pigment has an absorption maximum at >500 nm (47Mollon J.D “Tho she kneel'd in that place where they grew…”—the uses and origins of primate colour vision.J. Exp. Biol. 1989; 146: 21-38PubMed Google Scholar, 100Yokoyama S Molecular genetic basis of adaptive selection examples from color vision in vertebrates.Annu. Rev. Genet. 1997; 31: 315-336Crossref PubMed Scopus (82) Google Scholar). Rhodopsin, a third and equally ancient pigment, has an absorption maximum at ∼500 nm and plays little or no role in color vision. In general, the pigments mediating color vision reside in cone photoreceptors and are used only under bright light conditions, whereas rhodopsin resides in rod photoreceptors and is used under dim light conditions. Present-day vertebrates vary enormously in the sophistication of their color vision, the density and spatial distribution of cone classes, and the number and absorption maxima of their cone pigments (Figure 2; 38Lythgoe J.N The Ecology of Vision. Clarendon Press, Oxford1979Google Scholar, 30Jacobs G.H Comparative Color Vision. Academic Press, New York1981Google Scholar, 31Jacobs G.H The distribution and nature of colour vision among the mammals.Biol. Rev. 1993; 68: 413-471Crossref PubMed Google Scholar, 100Yokoyama S Molecular genetic basis of adaptive selection examples from color vision in vertebrates.Annu. Rev. Genet. 1997; 31: 315-336Crossref PubMed Scopus (82) Google Scholar). At one extreme, most mammals have only three pigments: the two ancestral cone pigments and rhodopsin. At the other evolutionary extreme, chickens possess six pigments: four cone pigments, one rhodopsin, and a pineal visual pigment, pinopsin. As seen in the dendrogram in Figure 2, the chicken green pigment was derived from a duplication within the rhodopsin branch. In this evolutionary comparison, humans and their closest primate relatives represent an intermediate level of complexity. Humans have four visual pigments: a single member of the <500 nm family of cone pigments (the blue or short-wave pigment, with an absorption maximum at ∼425 nm), two highly homologous members of the >500 nm family (the green or middle-wave pigment, and red or long-wave pigment, with absorption maxima at ∼530 and ∼560 nm, respectively), and rhodopsin. The presence of only a single gene encoding a >500 nm pigment in almost all New World primates, and in all nonprimate mammals studied to date, places the red/green visual pigment gene duplication in the Old World primate lineage at ∼30–40 million years ago, shortly after the geologic split between Africa and South America (31Jacobs G.H The distribution and nature of colour vision among the mammals.Biol. Rev. 1993; 68: 413-471Crossref PubMed Google Scholar). Current molecular genetic evidence suggests that howler monkeys, the only of New World primate with two >500 nm pigment have a gene duplication that is of the one within the Old World primate

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0896-6273(00)80845-4

Cites

100 of 100 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 100 references

Cited by

See all 347

Metadata

Authors
Nathans, J.
Venue
Neuron
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1999-10
Volume
24
Issue
2
Pages
299-312
ISSN
0896-6273 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2043817535
Cited by
347
References
100
FWCI
2.98
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
hybrid

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Evolution and Physiology of Human Color Vision. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/s0896-6273(00)80845-4
The paper
Nathans, J. (1999). The Evolution and Physiology of Human Color Vision. Neuron. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0896-6273(00)80845-4

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.