Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 1,721

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Molecular Genetics of Human Color Vision: The Genes Encoding Blue, Green, and Red Pigments

Nathans, Jeremy, Thomas, Darcy, Hogness, David S.·1986·Science

Abstract

Human color vision is based on three light-sensitive pigments. The isolation and sequencing of genomic and complementary DNA clones that encode the apoproteins of these three pigments are described. The deduced amino acid sequences show 41 ± 1 percent identity with rhodopsin. The red and green pigments show 96 percent mutual identity but only 43 percent identity with the blue pigment. Green pigment genes vary in number among color-normal individuals and, together with a single red pigment gene, are proposed to reside in a head-to-tail tandem array within the X chromosome.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1126/science.2937147

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 1,721

Metadata

Authors
Nathans, J., Thomas, D., & Hogness, D. S.
Venue
Science
Published
1986-04-11
Volume
232
Issue
4747
Pages
193-202
ISSN
  • 0036-8075 (ISSN-L)
  • 1095-9203
OpenAlex
W2019875735
Cited by
1,721
References
0
FWCI
29.84
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Molecular Genetics of Human Color Vision: The Genes Encoding Blue, Green, and Red Pigments. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1126/science.2937147
The paper
Nathans, J., Thomas, D., & Hogness, D. S. (1986). Molecular Genetics of Human Color Vision: The Genes Encoding Blue, Green, and Red Pigments. Science. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.2937147

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.