Cited by 210Cellular transport and secretionNeuroscience and Neuropharmacology ResearchExtracellular vesicles in disease

Delay between Fusion Pore Opening and Peptide Release from Large Dense-Core Vesicles in Neuroendocrine Cells

Open access
Barg, Sebastian, Olofsson, Charlotta S., Schriever-Abeln, Jenny, Wendt, Anna, Gebre-Medhin, Samuel, Renström, Erik, Rorsman, Patrik·2002·Neuron

Abstract

Peptidergic neurotransmission is slow compared to that mediated by classical neurotransmitters. We have studied exocytotic membrane fusion and cargo release by simultaneous capacitance measurements and confocal imaging of single secretory vesicles in neuroendocrine cells. Depletion of the readily releasable pool (RRP) correlated with exocytosis of 10%-20% of the docked vesicles. Some remaining vesicles became releasable after recovery of RRP. Expansion of the fusion pore, seen as an increase in luminal pH, occurred after approximately 0.3 s, and peptide release was delayed by another 1-10 s. We conclude that (1) RRP refilling involves chemical modification of vesicles already in place, (2) the release of large neuropeptides via the fusion pore is negligible and only proceeds after complete fusion, and (3) sluggish peptidergic transmission reflects the time course of vesicle emptying.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0896-6273(02)00563-9

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In the latter studies, most near-membrane granules were immobile, confirming they were functionally as well as morphologically docked.

    “In the latter studies, most of these near-membrane granules were immobile, thus confirming they were functionally as well as morphologically docked (49, 288).”

    From Pancreatic β-Cell Electrical Activity and Insulin Secretion: Of Mice and Men (2018) · cites this paper as [49]

    The Results section reports that most vesicles near the plasma membrane were nearly stationary: 69% ± 7% moved less than 0.5 μm in 10 seconds. But the Discussion says the readily releasable pool is only a subset of the docked pool; immobility does not confirm that most near-membrane granules were functionally docked. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Given that granule mobility is 1.5 μm/s, an increase in the intracellular ATP/ADP ratio increases exocytosis principally by priming of granules that are already situated close to the plasma membrane (within ≈0.5 μm).

    “Given that granule mobility is 1.5 μm/s (49, 702), this suggests that an increase in the intracellular ATP/ADP ratio increases exocytosis principally by priming of granules that are already situated close to the plasma membrane (within ≈0.5 μm).”
  • There is evidence that attachment of a large and bulky protein to proteins involved in exocytosis may influence the kinetics of secretion.

    “There is some is evidence that this may influence the kinetics of secretion (49, 445).”

    From Pancreatic β-Cell Electrical Activity and Insulin Secretion: Of Mice and Men (2018) · cites this paper as [49]

    The Discussion (page unavailable) says that labeling vesicle cargo with IAPP-EGFP did not appear to interfere with vesicle trafficking or, presumably, exocytosis. The paper reports delayed peptide release, but the passages found do not address whether attaching a bulky protein to proteins involved in exocytosis changes secretion kinetics. Searched for bulky protein tags, GFP fusions, and effects on exocytosis kinetics. (LLM, conf=0.72)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 8

  1. [1]1. Albillos, A. ∙ Dernick, G. ∙ Horstmann, H. ... The exocytotic event in chromaffin cells revealed by patch amperometry Nature. 1997; 389:509-512 Crossref Scopus (499) PubMed Google Scholar
  2. [2]2. Ales, E. ∙ Tabares, L. ∙ Poyato, J.M. ... High calcium concentrations shift the mode of exocytosis to the kiss-and-run mechanism Nat. Cell Biol. 1999; 1:40-44 Crossref Scopus (341) PubMed Google Scholar
  3. [3]3. Ämmälä, C. ∙ Eliasson, L. ∙ Bokvist, K. ... Exocytosis elicited by action potentials and voltage-clamp calcium currents in individual mouse pancreatic B-cells J. Physiol. 1993; 472:665-688 Crossref Scopus (251) PubMed Google Scholar
  4. [4]4. Angleson, J.K. ∙ Cochilla, A.J. ∙ Kilic, G. ... Regulation of dense core release from neuroendocrine cells revealed by imaging single exocytic events Nat. Neurosci. 1999; 2:440-446 Crossref Scopus (140) PubMed Google Scholar
  5. [5]5. Asfari, M. ∙ Janjic, D. ∙ Meda, P. ... Establishment of 2-mercaptoethanol-dependent differentiated insulin-secreting cell lines Endocrinology. 1992; 130:167-178 Crossref Scopus (0) PubMed Google Scholar
  6. [6]6. Augustine, G.J. ∙ Burns, M.E. ∙ DeBello, W.M. ... Exocytosisproteins and perturbations Annu. Rev. Pharmacol. Toxicol. 1996; 36:659-701 Crossref Scopus (118) PubMed Google Scholar
  7. [7]7. Barg, S. ∙ Eliasson, E. ∙ Galvanovskis, J. ... Fast exocytosis with few Ca2+-channels in insulin-secreting mouse pancreatic B-cells Biophys. J. 2001; 81:3308-3323 Full Text Full Text (PDF) Scopus (210) PubMed Google Scholar
  8. [8]8. Bittner, M.A. ∙ Holz, R.W. A temperature-sensitive step in exocytosis J. Biol. Chem. 1992; 267:16226-16229

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Barg, S., Olofsson, C. S., Schriever-Abeln, J., Wendt, A., Gebre-Medhin, S., Renström, E., & Rorsman, P.
Affiliations
Lund University (SE)
Corresponding author
Barg, Sebastian
Venue
Neuron
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2002-01
Volume
33
Issue
2
Pages
287-299
ISSN
0896-6273 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2054181228
Cited by
210
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 13 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 7
FWCI
6.58
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Neuron (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Lund University Publications (Lund University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cell Biology › Cellular transport and secretion
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Extracellular vesicles in disease
Keywords
exocytosis, dense core vesicles, neuroendocrine cells, readily releasable pool, peptide release, neuropeptide release, capacitance measurement
MeSH terms
Animals, Cell Line, Electric Stimulation, Exocytosis, Fluorescence, Hydrogen-Ion Concentration, Indicators and Reagents, Kinetics, Luminescent Proteins, Membrane Fusion, Neurosecretory Systems, Peptides, PC12 Cells, Secretory Vesicles, Green Fluorescent Proteins, Rats

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review