The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Coronary heart disease in seven countries
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“In contrast to the high-nitrate diet of Japan, the Seven Countries Study[378] found lower rates of CVD and cancer with the traditional Mediterranean diet, despite 37% of total daily energy coming from fat, versus only 11% in the traditional Japanese diet[378,379].”
From Enterosalivary nitrate metabolism and the microbiome: Intersection of microbial metabolism, nitric oxide and diet in cardiac and pulmonary vascular health (2017) · cites this paper as [378]
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Cardiovascular risk factor changes in Finland, 1972–1997
Vartiainen, E. A., Jousilahti, P., Alfthan, G., Sundvall, J., Pietinen, P., & Puska, P. (2000) · International Journal of Epidemiology · doi:10.1093/ije/29.1.49 · Cited by 401
Nutritional approaches to combat oxidative stress in Alzheimer’s disease
Butterfield, D. A., Castegna, A., Pocernich, C. B., Drake, J., Scapagnini, G., & Calabrese, V. (2002) · The Journal of Nutritional Biochemistry · doi:10.1016/s0955-2863(02)00205-x · Cited by 402
“Red wine In the 1970s, studies [146] showing a correlation between a Mediterranean diet and low incidence of coronary and ischemic heart disease, raised public interest as to the effects of beverages such as red wine protecting against health problems and aging.”
BackgroundPhytosterols—health benefits and potential concerns: a review
Kritchevsky, D., & Chen, S. C. (2005) · Nutrition Research · doi:10.1016/j.nutres.2005.02.003 · Cited by 323
“de Vries et al [98] analyzed the fat and sterol content of food composites (made up to approximate consumption in the 1960s) eaten by men in the Seven Countries Study [99].”
BackgroundCross-National Comparisons of Seafood Consumption and Rates of Bipolar Disorders
Noaghiul, S., & Hibbeln, J. R. (2003) · American Journal of Psychiatry · doi:10.1176/appi.ajp.160.12.2222 · Cited by 320
“Prior studies that have compared ecological and cross-national differences in dietary fat (4) and seafood intake (5) with prevalence rates of cardiovascular disease have stimulated research that led to the dietary recommendations of the American Heart Association for the prevention of cardiovascular diseases (6).”
BackgroundCrawford, M. A., Bloom, M. J., Broadhurst, C. L., Schmidt, W., Cunnane, S. C., Galli, C., Gehbremeskel, K., Linseisen, F. M., Lloyd-Smith, J., & Parkington, J. E. (1999) · Lipids · doi:10.1007/bf02562227 · Cited by 302
“If we now examine the contemporary evidence on cardiovascular disease, we find that land-based animal fats have been causally linked to heart disease since the Seven Countries Study of the 1950s and even earlier ( 27 ).”
Background
Metadata
- Authors
- Keys, A.
- Corresponding author
- Keys, Ancel
- Venue
- Nutrition
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 1997-03
- Volume
- 13
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 249-253
- ISSN
- 0899-9007 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1965972676
- Cited by
- 154
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 3
- FWCI
- 3.81
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Nutrition (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiovascular Health and Risk Factors
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Nutritional Studies and Diet
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Healthcare Systems and Public Health
- Keywords
- coronary artery disease, cross-national comparison, dietary factors, cardiovascular risk factors
- MeSH terms
- Coronary Disease, Europe, Humans, Japan, Male, United States, History, 20th Century
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
