The DOI matches its Crossref record; 31 of the 32 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The mini nutritional assessment (MNA) and its use in grading the nutritional state of elderly patients
Abstract
The Mini Nutritional Assessment (MNA) has recently been designed and validated to provide a single, rapid assessment of nutritional status in elderly patients in outpatient clinics, hospitals, and nursing homes. It has been translated into several languages and validated in many clinics around the world. The MNA test is composed of simple measurements and brief questions that can be completed in about 10 min. Discriminant analysis was used to compare the findings of the MNA with the nutritional status determined by physicians, using the standard extensive nutritional assessment including complete anthropometric, clinical biochemistry, and dietary parameters. The sum of the MNA score distinguishes between elderly patients with: 1) adequate nutritional status, MNA > or = 24; 2) protein-calorie malnutrition, MNA < 17; 3) at risk of malnutrition, MNA between 17 and 23.5. With this scoring, sensitivity was found to be 96%, specificity 98%, and predictive value 97%. The MNA scale was also found to be predictive of mortality and hospital cost. Most important it is possible to identify people at risk for malnutrition, scores between 17 and 23.5, before severe changes in weight or albumin levels occur. These individuals are more likely to have a decrease in caloric intake that can be easily corrected by nutritional intervention.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“ESPEN recommended the use of the Malnutrition Universal Screening Tool (MUST) in community settings (48), the Nutritional Risk Screening tool (NRS-2002) in clinical settings (49), and the Mini Nutritional Assessment (MNA) for the elderly (50).”
From Evolution of the diagnosis of malnutrition in adults: a primer for clinicians (2024) · cites this paper as [50]
Citations
Cites
A Coefficient of Agreement for Nominal Scales
Cohen, J. (1960) · Educational and Psychological Measurement · doi:10.1177/001316446002000104 · Cited by 42,398
What is subjective global assessment of nutritional status?
Detsky, A., McLaughlin, Baker, J., Johnston, N., Whittaker, S., Mendelson, R., & Jeejeebhoy, K. (1987) · Journal of Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition · doi:10.1177/014860718701100108 · Cited by 3,252
Guigoz, Y., Vellas, B. J., & Garry, P. J. (2009) · Nutrition Reviews · doi:10.1111/j.1753-4887.1996.tb03793.x · Cited by 1,559
Self-citationPrognostic nutritional index in gastrointestinal surgery
Buzby, G. P., Mullen, J. L., Matthews, D. C., Hobbs, C. L., & Rosato, E. F. (1980) · The American Journal of Surgery · doi:10.1016/0002-9610(80)90246-9 · Cited by 1,556
Present Knowledge in Nutrition
Marriott, B. P., Birt, D. F., & Stallings, V. A. (2020) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/c2018-0-02422-6 · Cited by 985
Guigoz, Y., Vellas, B. J., Garry, P. J., Vellas, B. J., & Albaréde, J. L. (1994) · Cited by 892
Self-citationAnorexia of aging: physiologic and pathologic
Morley, J. (1997) · American Journal of Clinical Nutrition · doi:10.1093/ajcn/66.4.760 · Cited by 761
Nutrition and health risks in the elderly: the nutrition screening initiative.
Posner, B. M., Jette, A. M., SMITH, K., & Miller, D. R. (1993) · American Journal of Public Health · doi:10.2105/ajph.83.7.972 · Cited by 469
Cereda, E. (2011) · Current Opinion in Clinical Nutrition & Metabolic Care · doi:10.1097/mco.0b013e32834d7647 · Cited by 359
Nutritional Issues in Nursing Home Care
Morley, J. E., & Silver, A. J. (1995) · Annals of Internal Medicine · doi:10.7326/0003-4819-123-11-199512010-00008 · Cited by 297
Research works printed but not linked: 9
- Guigoz, 1995, Test d’evaluation de l’etat nutritionnel de la personne agée, Med et Hyg, 53, 1965
- Guigoz, 1997, Malnutrition im alter, Therap Umschau, 54, 345
- Salva, 1996, Un nuevo instrumento para la valoracion nutricional en geriatria, Rev Gerontol, 6, 319
- Rush, 1997, Nutrition screening in old people, Annu Rev Nutr, 17, 101, 10.1146/annurev.nutr.17.1.101 · DOI
- Pertoldi, 1996, The Mini Nutritional Assessment a predictor of hospital costs in geriatric patients (abstract), J Am Geriatr Soc, 44, 230
- Salva, 1996, Results of the “Mini Nutritional Assessment” (MNA) in nursing home residents (abstract), J Am Geriatr Soc, 44, 11
- Ghisolfi-Marque, 1996, Nutritional status in Alzheimer’s disease, J Am Geriatr Soc, 44, 92
- Vellas, 1996, The Mini Nutritional Assessment (MNA) as predictor of mortality in elderly patients (abstract), J Am Geriatr Soc, 44, 242
- Vellas B, Garry PJ, Guigoz Y, eds. Mini nutritional assessment: research and practice in the elderly.Nestlé Workshop Series Clinical & Performance Programme No. 1. Basel, Switzerland: Karger, in press
Cited by
Sorted by citations
ESPEN Guidelines for Nutrition Screening 2002
Kondrup, J. (2003) · Clinical Nutrition · doi:10.1016/s0261-5614(03)00098-0 · Cited by 3,159
Kaiser, M., Bauer, J. M., Rämsch, C., Uter, W. J. C., Guigoz, Y., Cederholm, T., Thomas, D. R., Anthony, P. S., Charlton, K. E., Maggio, M. G., et al. (2009) · The journal of nutrition health & aging · doi:10.1007/s12603-009-0214-7 · Cited by 2,083
Self-citationPrognostic impact of disease-related malnutrition.
Norman, K., Pichard, C., Lochs, H., & Pirlich, M. (2008) · Clinical Nutrition · doi:10.1016/j.clnu.2007.10.007 · Cited by 1,460
ESPEN guideline on clinical nutrition and hydration in geriatrics
Volkert, D., Beck, A. M., Cederholm, T., Cruz-Jentoft, A., Goisser, S., Hooper, L., Kiesswetter, E., Maggio, M., Raynaud-Simon, A., Sieber, C. C., et al. (2019) · Clinical Nutrition · doi:10.1016/j.clnu.2018.05.024 · Cited by 1,505
CONUT: a tool for controlling nutritional status. First validation in a hospital population.
de Ulíbarri, J. I., González-Madroño, A., de Villar, N. G. P., González, P., González, B., Mancha, A., Rodríguez, F., & Fernández, G. (2005) · PubMed · Cited by 1,383
Metadata
- Authors
- Vellas, B., Guigoz, Y., Garry, P. J., Nourhashemi, F., Bennahum, D., Lauque, S., & Albarede, J.-L.
- Affiliations
- Nestlé (Switzerland) (CH)
- University of New Mexico (US)
- Corresponding author
- Guigoz, Yves
- ORCID
- Vellas, Bruno
- Venue
- Nutrition
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 1999-02
- Volume
- 15
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 116-122
- ISSN
- 0899-9007 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2082755106
- Cited by
- 2,161
- References
- 32
- Citations by year
- 2026: 140 · 2025: 172 · 2024: 159 · 2023: 159 · 2022: 157 · 2021: 134 · 2020: 174 · 2019: 109 · 2018: 103 · 2017: 75 · 2016: 72 · 2015: 75 · 2014: 62 · 2013: 79 · 2012: 70
- FWCI
- 5.68
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Nutrition (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology (medical) › Nutrition and Health in Aging
- Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Clinical Nutrition and Gastroenterology
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology (medical) › Body Composition Measurement Techniques
- Keywords
- Mini Nutritional Assessment, nutritional assessment, elderly patients, malnutrition, protein-energy malnutrition, nutritional screening, mortality prediction, hospital costs, dietary intervention
- MeSH terms
- Aged, Aging, Anthropometry, Diet, Geriatrics, Humans, Nutrition Disorders, Nutritional Status, Perception, Nutrition Assessment
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review