Cited by 3,252Clinical Nutrition and GastroenterologyNutrition and Health in AgingBody Composition Measurement Techniques

What is subjective global assessment of nutritional status?

Detsky, AS, McLaughlin, Baker, JP, Johnston, N, Whittaker, S, Mendelson, RA, Jeejeebhoy, KN·1987·Journal of Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition

Abstract

Presented and described in detail is a clinical technique called subjective global assessment (SGA), which assesses nutritional status based on features of the history and physical examination. Illustrative cases are presented. To clarify further the nature of the SGA, the method was applied before gastrointestinal surgery to 202 hospitalized patients. The primary aim of the study was to determine the extent to which our clinician's SGA ratings were influenced by the individual clinical variables on which the clinicians were taught to base their assessments. Virtually all of these variables were significantly related to SGA class. Multivariate analysis showed that ratings were most affected by loss of subcutaneous tissue, muscle wasting, and weight loss. A high degree of interobserver agreement was found (kappa = 0.78, 95% confidence interval 0.624 to 0.944, p less than 0.001). We conclude that SGA can easily be taught to a variety of clinicians (residents, nurses), and that this technique is reproducible.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/014860718701100108

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • These publications provide evidence that GLIM has good concurrent criterion validity when compared with established models SGA, MNA-SF, and AAIM.

    “These publications provide evidence that GLIM has good concurrent criterion validity when compared with established models—ie, Subjective Global Assessment (SGA), 9 Mini Nutritional Assessment‐Short Form (MNA‐SF), 10 and the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics and ASPEN Indicators to Diagnose Malnutrition (AAIM). 11”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Detsky, A., McLaughlin, Baker, J., Johnston, N., Whittaker, S., Mendelson, R., & Jeejeebhoy, K.
Venue
Journal of Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1987-01
Volume
11
Issue
1
Pages
8-13
ISSN
  • 0148-6071 (ISSN-L)
  • 1941-2444
OpenAlex
W2011769683
Cited by
3,252
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 86 · 2025: 154 · 2024: 147 · 2023: 148 · 2022: 174 · 2021: 164 · 2020: 189 · 2019: 138 · 2018: 139 · 2017: 165 · 2016: 121 · 2015: 140 · 2014: 146 · 2013: 155 · 2012: 141
FWCI
8.29
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Clinical Nutrition and Gastroenterology
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Nutrition and Health in Aging
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Body Composition Measurement Techniques
Keywords
Subjective Global Assessment, nutritional assessment, malnutrition, muscle atrophy, weight loss, interobserver agreement, gastrointestinal surgery, hospitalized patients, clinical teaching
MeSH terms
Humans, Medical History Taking, Methods, Middle Aged, Nutritional Status, Regression Analysis

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review