Cited by 3,159Nutrition and Health in AgingClinical Nutrition and GastroenterologyDietetics, Nutrition, and Education

ESPEN Guidelines for Nutrition Screening 2002

Kondrup, J·2003·Clinical Nutrition

Abstract

Aim To provide guidelines for nutrition risk screening applicable to different settings (community, hospital, elderly) based on published and validated evidence available until June 2002. NOTE: These guidelines deliberately make reference to the year 2002 in their title to indicate that this version is based on the evidence available until 2002 and that they need to be updated and adapted to current state of knowledge in the future. In order to reach this goal the Education and Clinical Practice Committee invites and welcomes all criticism and suggestions (button for mail to ECPC chairman).

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0261-5614(03)00098-0

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In 2002, ESPEN developed a set of guidelines for nutrition risk screening applicable to a wide range of settings, including community, clinical, and elderly.

    “In 2002 (Figure 1), the European Society for Clinical Nutrition and Metabolism (ESPEN) developed a set of guidelines for nutrition risk screening applicable to a wide range of settings, including community, clinical, and elderly (47).”
  • NRS 2002 and MNA-SF are rapid, easily undertaken and show a high degree of content validity and reliability, making them suitable in polymorbid medical inpatients including those with cognitive dysfunction.

    “Both of these tools are rapid, easily undertaken and show a high degree of content validity and reliability, thereby making them suitable in polymorbid medical inpatients including those patients with cognitive dysfunction [26,27].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kondrup, J.
Affiliations
Copenhagen University Hospital (DK)
Corresponding author
Kondrup, J
Venue
Clinical Nutrition
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2003-08
Volume
22
Issue
4
Pages
415-421
ISSN
0261-5614 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2001246541
Cited by
3,159
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 147 · 2025: 187 · 2024: 211 · 2023: 197 · 2022: 250 · 2021: 256 · 2020: 205 · 2019: 168 · 2018: 162 · 2017: 157 · 2016: 150 · 2015: 159 · 2014: 147 · 2013: 150 · 2012: 126
FWCI
17.48
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Clinical Nutrition (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • ePrints Soton (University of Southampton) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Nutrition and Health in Aging
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Clinical Nutrition and Gastroenterology
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Dietetics, Nutrition, and Education
Keywords
nutritional screening, nutritional risk assessment, malnutrition, hospitalized patients, elderly patients, community settings
MeSH terms
Adult, Child, Humans, Mass Screening, Nutrition Disorders, Nutrition Assessment, Nutritional Support

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review