The DOI matches its Crossref record; 39 of the 39 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the Spanish version of the Calgary Depression Scale for Schizophrenia
Abstract
Background The Calgary Depression Scale for Schizophrenia (CDSS) is a valid tool to assess depression in schizophrenics and has been translated, adapted, and validated to be used in different non-English languages. Therefore, it may be predicted that a Spanish version of this scale will be also a valid instrument to assess symptoms of depression in patients with schizophrenia.Objective We determined the validity of the Spanish version of the Calgary scale (CDSS-S).Methods Outpatients and inpatients (n=93) diagnosed as having schizophrenia by DSM-IV criteria confirmed by SCID-IV interview were included. The Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS), Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HDRS-17 and HDRS-21 items), Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS), Extrapyramidal Symptoms Rating Scale (ESRS), and Barnes Acathisia Rating Scale were administered by a first rater, whereas the CDSS-S was assessed by a second independent rater.Results The internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha 0.83) and the interrater reliability (>0.73 intraclass correlation coefficient [ICC] for single items and 0.92 for total score) were good. The test-retest reliability was high (ICC of 0.89). The scale showed a good construct validity with statistically significant correlations with HDRS-17, HDRS-21, MADRS, and G6 item (depression) of PANSS. The CDSS showed no correlation with the positive subscale of PANSS and a weak correlation with the negative subscale, general psychopathology subscale, and total score of PANSS. A cut point of five showed 94.7% sensitivity, 86.5% specificity, and 70% and 98% positive and negative predictive values, respectively.Conclusions The Spanish version of CDSS is a valid instrument to assess depressive episodes for stabilized and acute patients with schizophrenia.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Spanish version of CDSS has high internal consistency (Cronbach’s alpha = 0.83) and high inter-rater reliability (ICC > 0.70); it also discriminates between depressed and non-depressed people with SSD [41].”
Citations
Cites
Coefficient Alpha and the Internal Structure of Tests
Cronbach, L. J. (1951) · Psychometrika · doi:10.1007/bf02310555 · Cited by 43,931
Hamilton, M. (1960) · Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry · doi:10.1136/jnnp.23.1.56 · Cited by 32,817
The Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) for schizophrenia.
Kay, S. R., Fiszbein, A., & Opler, L. A. (1987) · Schizophrenia Bulletin · doi:10.1093/schbul/13.2.261 · Cited by 21,378
A new depression scale designed to be sensitive to change
Montgomery, S. A., & Åsberg, M. (1979) · British Journal of Psychiatry · doi:10.1192/bjp.134.4.382 · Cited by 13,962
Rozeboom, W. W., Lord, F. M., Novick, M. R., & Birnbaum, A. (1969) · American Educational Research Journal · doi:10.2307/1162101 · Cited by 8,012
Book Review: Measurement and Classification of Psychiatric Symptoms
Priest, R. G. (1975) · Proceedings of the Royal Society of Medicine · doi:10.1177/003591577506800751 · Cited by 2,268
A Rating Scale for Drug-Induced Akathisia
Barnes, T. R. E. (1989) · The British Journal of Psychiatry · doi:10.1192/bjp.154.5.672 · Cited by 2,179
The statistical power of abnormal-social psychological research: A review.
Cohen, J. (1962) · The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/h0045186 · Cited by 1,824
A depression rating scale for schizophrenics
Addington, D. E., Addington, J., & Schıssel, B. (1990) · Schizophrenia Research · doi:10.1016/0920-9964(90)90005-r · Cited by 1,270
Assessing Depression in Schizophrenia: The Calgary Depression Scale
Addington, D. E., Addington, J., & Maticka‐Tyndale, E. (1993) · The British Journal of Psychiatry · doi:10.1192/s0007125000292581 · Cited by 1,177
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 101–102 of 102
Cifuentes, J. I., Orellana, C., Tello, D., Ramírez, C., Prieto, C., Guasti, J. M., & Nieto, R. R. (2026) · Frontiers in Psychiatry · doi:10.3389/fpsyt.2026.1936475
Metabolic Syndrome Among Inpatients With Schizophrenia: Prevalence and Clinical Correlates
汤瑁, Chang, S.-H., Qian, H., Zhang, C.-Y., & Zhong, B. (2026) · ALPHA PSYCHIATRY · doi:10.31083/ap56362
Metadata
- Authors
- Sarró, S.
- Affiliations
- Hospital General de Granollers (ES)
- Corresponding author
- Sarró, S
- ORCID
- Sarró, S
- Venue
- Schizophrenia Research
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2004-06-01
- Volume
- 68
- Issue
- 2-3
- Pages
- 349-356
- ISSN
- 0920-9964 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2167486251
- Cited by
- 101
- References
- 39
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 1
- FWCI
- 0.63
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Schizophrenia Research (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Schizophrenia research and treatment
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
- Keywords
- Calgary Depression Scale for Schizophrenia, Spanish translation
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Cross-Cultural Comparison, Depressive Disorder, Female, Humans, Language, Male, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, Psychometrics, Schizophrenia, Schizophrenic Psychology, Spain, Translations, United States, Reproducibility of Results, Comorbidity, Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review