The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Do focus groups and individual interviews reveal the same information for natural resource valuation?
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Weber, R. (1990) · doi:10.4135/9781412983488 · Cited by 7,750
Morgan, D. L. (1996) · Annual Review of Sociology · doi:10.1146/annurev.soc.22.1.129 · Cited by 2,353
Cited by
The Use of Triangulation in Qualitative Research
Carter, N., Bryant-Lukosius, D., DiCenso, A., Blythe, J., & Neville, A. J. (2014) · Oncology Nursing Forum · doi:10.1188/14.onf.545-547 · Cited by 3,915
How many focus groups are enough? Building an evidence base for nonprobability sample sizes
Guest, G., Namey, E., & McKenna, K. (2017) · Field Methods · doi:10.1177/1525822x16639015 · Cited by 1,752
Contemporary Guidance for Stated Preference Studies
Johnston, R. J., Boyle, K. J., Adamowicz, W. (., Bennett, J., Brouwer, R., Cameron, T. A., Hanemann, W. M., Hanley, N., Ryan, M., Scarpa, R., et al. (2017) · Journal of the Association of Environmental and Resource Economists · doi:10.1086/691697 · Cited by 1,430
(2015) · Doing Survey Research · doi:10.4324/9781315635088-9 · Cited by 541
Christie, M., Fazey, I., Cooper, R., Hyde, T., & Kenter, J. O. (2012) · Ecological Economics · doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2012.08.012 · Cited by 351
Metadata
- Authors
- Kaplowitz, M. D., & Hoehn, J. P.
- Venue
- Ecological Economics
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2001-02
- Volume
- 36
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 237-247
- ISSN
- 0921-8009 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1976575041
- Cited by
- 232
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 14.32
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Do focus groups and individual interviews reveal the same information for natural resource valuation? https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/s0921-8009(00)00226-3
- The paper
- Kaplowitz, M. D., & Hoehn, J. P. (2001). Do focus groups and individual interviews reveal the same information for natural resource valuation? Ecological Economics. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0921-8009(00)00226-3
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
