Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 541

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 100 of the 100 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Developing a Questionnaire

·2015·Doing Survey Research
DOI 10.4324/9781315635088-9
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

S ome years ago, a solicitation letter (i.e., junk mail) arrived in the mail asking for money to “clean up television.” I strongly agree that there’s much on TV that I would like to see changed, but my list would be to eliminate stupid reality shows and vapid local news programs. This letter had a different focus, though. Attached to the donation card was an “official poll” asking the following questions and expecting only a yes or no answer: • Are you in favor of cable television now bringing hard-core pornography into your living rooms?

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.4324/9781315635088-9

Cites

100 of 100 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 100 references

Cited by

See all 541

Metadata

Venue
Doing Survey Research
Publisher
Routledge
Published
2015-11-17
Pages
80-121
DOI
10.4324/9781315635088-9
OpenAlex
W1581710858
Cited by
541
References
100
FWCI
232.01
Type
book chapter
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Developing a Questionnaire. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.4324/9781315635088-9
The paper
Developing a Questionnaire. (2015). Doing Survey Research. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315635088-9

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.