Cited by 306Face recognition and analysisFace and Expression RecognitionVideo Surveillance and Tracking Methods

A novel method for automatic face segmentation, facial feature extraction and tracking

Sobottka, Karin, Pitas, Ioannis·1998·Signal Processing: Image Communication

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0923-5965(97)00042-8

Cites

19 of 19 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Sobottka, K., & Pitas, I.
Affiliations
Aristotle University of Thessaloniki (GR)
Corresponding author
Sobottka, Karin
Venue
Signal Processing: Image Communication
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1998-06
Volume
12
Issue
3
Pages
263-281
ISSN
0923-5965 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2034058812
Cited by
306
References
19
Citations by year
2024: 6 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 18 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 20 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 17
FWCI
11.99
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Signal Processing Image Communication (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Face recognition and analysis
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Face and Expression Recognition
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Video Surveillance and Tracking Methods
Keywords
face segmentation, facial feature extraction, facial feature tracking, deformable models, snakes, block matching, face detection, facial expressions

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review