Cited by 1,334Phytochemicals and Antioxidant ActivitiesAgricultural and Biological ResearchFood Nutrient Composition and Product Development

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 156 of the 171 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

By-products of plant food processing as a source of functional compounds—Recent developments

Schieber, A, Stintzing, F.C, Carle, R·2001·Trends in Food Science & Technology

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0924-2244(02)00012-2

Cites

156 of 156 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 171 references

Research works printed but not linked: 29

  1. Anand, 1997, Utilisation of fruit and vegetable wastes, Indian Food Packer, 51, 45
  2. Anonymous (2000). By-products: a dazzling range of options. International Sugar Journal, 102, 122–123
  3. Askar, 1998, Importance and characteristics of tropical fruits, Fruit Processing, 8, 273
  4. Askar, 1998, Nebenprodukte bei der Verarbeitung tropischer Früchte, Industrielle Obst- und Gemüseverwertung, 83, 7
  5. BgVV. (1998). BgVV empfiehlt Rauchern auf Beta-Carotin-haltige Präparate zu verzichten. Press Release, 30 January.
  6. BgVV. (2001). Gesundheitlich bedenklich: BgVV empfiehlt Höchstmengen für isoliertes Beta-Carotin. Press Release, 31 January.
  7. Broughton, 1995, Adding value to sugar beet pulp, Zuckerindustrie, 120, 411
  8. Chung, 1979, Bioprotein from banana waste, Developments in Industrial Microbiology, 20, 723
  9. Das, 2001, Protein and amino acids from cellulosic wastes of agriculture and food industry — a review, Indian Food Packer, 55, 57
  10. Endreß, 2000, Gehobene Qualität durch Produkt-Integrierten Umweltschutz–PIUS, Flüssiges Obst, 67, 460
  11. Fox, 1991, Aufwand und Nutzen der Apfeltresterverwertung, Flüssiges Obst, 58, 492
  12. Gandhi, 1997, Nutritional and toxicological evaluation of wild apricot pomace, Journal of Food Science and Technology India, 34, 132
  13. Gasparrini, 1999, Treatment of olive oil processing residues, Oils & Fats International, February, 32
  14. Girdhar, 2000, Grape waste as a source of tartrates, Indian Food Packer, 54, 59
  15. Henn, 1996, Pflanzliche Reststoffe zur Herstellung von Functional Drinks, Flüssiges Obst., 63, 715
  16. Horenburg, 2001, Fruchtsaft und -nektar in Westeuropa — Andauernder Aufwärtstrend, Flüssiges Obst, 5a, 28
  17. Kee, 2001, Physical properties of extruded snack made of dried onion and onion pomace, Journal of the Korean Society of Food Science and Nutrition, 30, 64
  18. Loeillet, 1994, The European mango market, Fruits, 49, 332
  19. Muroki, 1977, Pectin from guava fruit (Psidium guajava L.), Lebensmittel-Wissenschaft und -Technologie, 10, 314
  20. Ohsawa, 1994, Studies on effective utilisation of carrot pomace. I. Effective utilisation to bread, Research Report of the Nagano State Laboratory of Food Technology, 22, 22
  21. Ohsawa, 1995, Studies on effective utilisation of carrot pomace. II. Effective utilisation to cake, dressing and pickles, Research Report of the Nagano State Laboratory of Food Technology, 23, 15
  22. Parr, 2000, Phenols in the plant and in men. The potential for possible nutritional enhancement of the diet by modifying the phenols content or profile, Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture, 80, 985, 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0010(20000515)80:7<985::AID-JSFA572>3.0.CO;2-7 · DOI
  23. Pourrat, 1987, Propriétés du jus et des colorants de la betterave rouge, Médicin et Nutrition, 23, 166
  24. Ramteke, 1999, Processing and value addition to mangoes, Indian Food Industry, 18, 155
  25. Siliha, 2000, Citrus wastes, Obst-, Gemüse- und Kartoffelverarbeitung [Fruit, Vegetable and Potato Processing], 85, 31
  26. Sogi, 1999, Characterization and utilization of tomato seed oil from tomato processing waste, Journal of Food Science and Technology India, 36, 248
  27. Stintzing, 2000, Rote Bete als färbendes Lebensmittel — eine Bestandsaufnahme, Obst, Gemüse- und Kartoffelverarbeitung (Fruit, Vegetable and Potato Processing), 85, 196
  28. Sudhakar, 1995, Pectins from fruit processing waste — a review, Indian Food Packer, 49, 39
  29. Waldron, 2001, Useful ingredients from onion waste, Food Science and Technology, 15, 38

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 601–700 of 1,001

Metadata

Authors
Schieber, A., Stintzing, F. C., & Carle, R.
Affiliations
University of Hohenheim (DE)
Corresponding author
Schieber, A
Venue
Trends in Food Science & Technology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2001-11
Volume
12
Issue
11
Pages
401-413
ISSN
0924-2244 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2092048442
Cited by
1,334
References
171
Citations by year
2026: 36 · 2025: 47 · 2024: 47 · 2023: 57 · 2022: 79 · 2021: 89 · 2020: 91 · 2019: 91 · 2018: 67 · 2017: 96 · 2016: 84 · 2015: 86 · 2014: 89 · 2013: 69 · 2012: 74
FWCI
3.66
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Trends in Food Science & Technology (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Biochemistry (medical) › Phytochemicals and Antioxidant Activities
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Agricultural and Biological Research
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Food Nutrient Composition and Product Development
Keywords
functional compounds, plant secondary metabolites, food by-product valorization, food waste disposal, bioactive compounds

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review