The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Psychological autopsy studies – a review
Abstract
Summary: Psychological autopsy is one of the most valuable tools of research on completed suicide. The method involves collecting all available information on the deceased via structured interviews of family members, relatives or friends as well as attending health care personnel. In addition, information is collected from available health care and psychiatric records, other documents, and forensic examination. Thus a psychological autopsy synthesizes the information from multiple informants and records. The early generation of psychological autopsies established that more than 90% of completed suicides have suffered from usually co-morbid mental disorders, most of them mood disorders and/or substance use disorders. Furthermore, they revealed the remarkable undertreatment of these mental disorders, often despite contact with psychiatric or other health care services. More recent psychological autopsy studies have mostly used case-control designs, thus having been better able to estimate the role of various risk factors for suicide. The future psychological autopsy studies may be more focused on interactions between risk factors or risk factor domains, focused on some specific suicide populations of major interest for suicide prevention, or combined psychological autopsy methodology with biological measurements.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
(1996) · American Journal of Psychiatry · doi:10.1176/ajp.153.8.1001 · Cited by 725
(1998) · Journal of Affective Disorders · doi:10.1016/s0165-0327(98)00033-0 · Cited by 324
Cited by
The psychology of suicidal behaviour
O'Connor, R. C., & Nock, M. K. (2014) · The Lancet Psychiatry · doi:10.1016/s2215-0366(14)70222-6 · Cited by 1,193
Psychiatric diagnoses in 3275 suicides: a meta-analysis
Arsenault-Lapierre, G., Kim, C., & Turecki, G. (2004) · BMC Psychiatry · doi:10.1186/1471-244x-4-37 · Cited by 985
Ferrari, A. J., Norman, R. E., Freedman, G., Baxter, A. J., Pirkis, J. E., Harris, M. G., Page, A., Carnahan, E., Degenhardt, L., Vos, T., et al. (2014) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0091936 · Cited by 480
Suicidal risk factors and completed suicide: meta-analyses based on psychological autopsy studies
Yoshimasu, K., Kiyohara, C., Miyashita, K., & The Stress Research Group of the Japanese Society for Hygiene (2008) · Environmental Health and Preventive Medicine · doi:10.1007/s12199-008-0037-x · Cited by 375
Favril, L., Yu, R., Uyar, A., Sharpe, M., & Fazel, S. (2022) · Evidence Based Mental Health · doi:10.1136/ebmental-2022-300549 · Cited by 336
Metadata
- Authors
- Isometsä, E. T.
- Venue
- European Psychiatry
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press (CUP)
- Published
- 2001-11
- Volume
- 16
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 379-385
- ISSN
- 0924-9338 (ISSN-L)
- 1778-3585
- OpenAlex
- W2031495602
- Cited by
- 379
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 4.70
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.