Cited by 375Suicide and Self-Harm StudiesHomicide, Infanticide, and Child AbuseGrief, Bereavement, and Mental Health

Suicidal risk factors and completed suicide: meta-analyses based on psychological autopsy studies

Open access
Yoshimasu, Kouichi, Kiyohara, Chikako, Miyashita, Kazuhisa, The Stress Research Group of the Japanese Society for Hygiene·2008·Environmental Health and Preventive Medicine

Abstract

The purpose of the present review is to evaluate the effects of common risk factors for suicide by meta-analyses using data extracted from studies based on the psychological autopsy method. We focused on five common risk factors of suicide: substance-related disorders, mood disorders, adverse marital status, adverse employment status, and self-harm behaviors. A total of 24 articles were identified from MEDLINE in which the crude odds ratio (OR) could be calculated for the above five risk factors through 30 April 2007, using such search keywords as "suicide," "psychological autopsy," and "case-control study." Overall, both substance-related disorders [OR = 5.24; 95% confidence interval (CI) = 3.30-8.31] and mood disorders [OR = 13.42; 95% CI = 8.05-22.37] were strongly associated with suicidal risk. Suicidal attempt and deliberate self-harm, which can directly lead to completed suicide, have been shown to be very strongly associated with suicidal risk [OR = 16.33; 95% CI = 7.51-35.52]. Effects of social factors such as adverse marital and employment status were relatively small. As substance-related disorders and mood disorders were strongly associated with an increased risk of completed suicide, the comorbidity of these two disorders should be paid a maximum attention. The effective prevention of suicide depends on whether we can successfully incorporate these personal factors as well as social factors into an adequate multi-factorial model.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s12199-008-0037-x

Cites

44 of 44 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Previous reviews of psychological autopsy studies have been limited in scope (primarily focusing on mental disorders) and samples (including selected populations such as psychiatric patients).

    “To our knowledge, five previous reviews have quantitatively summarised findings from psychological autopsy studies,5–9 but these have been limited in scope (primarily focusing on mental disorders) and samples (including selected populations such as psychiatric patients).”
  • The inclusion of studies with controls who died by causes other than suicide is consistent with previous reviews of psychological autopsy studies.

    “The inclusion of studies with controls who died by causes other than suicide is consistent with previous reviews of psychological autopsy studies.5–9”
  • Bibliographical searches were complemented by manual searches of reference lists of included studies and previous systematic reviews.

    “Bibliographical searches were complemented by manual searches of reference lists of included studies and previous systematic reviews.5–9”
  • Previous reviews of psychological autopsy studies have not captured the breadth of individual-level risk factors for suicide and mainly focused on the contribution of mental disorders to suicide risk.

    “First, previous reviews of psychological autopsy studies5–9 have not captured the breadth of individual-level risk factors for suicide, and instead mainly focused on the contribution of mental disorders to suicide risk.”
  • Psychological autopsy studies indicate that mood disorders and substance use disorders are major risks for suicide.

    “Information collected on persons who have died by suicide (“psychological autopsy”) indicates that mood disorders and substance use disorders are the major risks.23”

    From Suicide (2020) · cites this paper as [23]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Sechter D, Bonin B, Bertschy G, Vandel S, Bizouard P. Predic- tion of suicide risk. Encephale. 1991;17:361-4.
  2. Takahashi Y. Risk factors of suicide. In: Suicide Risk. Tokyo: Kongo Press; 2006. pp 44-61. (Article in Japanese).

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Yoshimasu, K., Kiyohara, C., Miyashita, K., & The Stress Research Group of the Japanese Society for Hygiene
Affiliations
  • Wakayama Medical University (JP)
  • Kyushu University (JP)
Corresponding author
Yoshimasu, Kouichi
Venue
Environmental Health and Preventive Medicine
Published
2008-06-19
Volume
13
Issue
5
Pages
243-256
ISSN
  • 1342-078X (ISSN-L)
  • 1347-4715
OpenAlex
W2125833925
Cited by
375
References
44
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 21 · 2022: 32 · 2021: 28 · 2020: 56 · 2019: 18 · 2018: 37 · 2017: 26 · 2016: 19 · 2015: 18 · 2014: 19 · 2013: 21 · 2012: 17
FWCI
8.53
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Environmental Health and Preventive Medicine (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Suicide and Self-Harm Studies
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Homicide, Infanticide, and Child Abuse
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Grief, Bereavement, and Mental Health
Keywords
suicide mortality, suicide risk factors, psychological autopsy, substance-related disorders, mood disorders, self-harm, suicide attempts, comorbidities, suicide prevention

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review