Cited by 4Medication Adherence and ComplianceSchizophrenia research and treatmentPsychotherapy Techniques and Applications

Antipsychotic Adherence Intervention for Veterans over 40 with Schizophrenia: Results of a Pilot Study

Open access
Mittal, D., Owen, R., Lacro, J., Landes, R., Edlund, M., Valenstein, M., Jeste, D.·2009·European Psychiatry

Abstract

This pilot study tested the feasibility, acceptability, and effect-sizes of a multimodal, individual intervention designed to optimize antipsychotic medication use in patients ≥40 years of age with schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder. Methods: We randomized 40 patients into two groups: usual care (UC) or a nine-session, manualized, antipsychotic adherence intervention (AAI). the AAI attempted to improve adherence by combining three psychosocial techniques: a.education, b.skills training, and c.alliance building. Sessions employed a semi-structured format to facilitate open communication. the primary outcome was antipsychotic adherence at study end. We obtained qualitative data regarding patient preferences for the duration and modality for receiving the adherence intervention. Results: Compared to the UC group, a greater proportion of the AAI group was adherent post-intervention based on medication possession ratio, a commonly used measure of medication adherence (85% vs. 66.6%; OR=2.64), a difference that was statistically not significant. the entire AAI group reported that they intended to take medications, and 75% were satisfied with the intervention. Conclusions: The AAI was feasible and acceptable. Preliminary data on its effectiveness warrant a larger study. Qualitative data shows that patients prefer brief adherence interventions and accept telephone strategies.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0924-9338(09)71404-x

Cites

30 of 30 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 6

  1. [3]Lacro JP Dunn LB Dolder CR Leckband SG Jeste DV Prevalence of and risk factors for medication nonadherence inpatients with schizophrenia: A comprehensive review of recent literature J Clin Psychiatry 2002 63 10 892 909 12416599
  2. [9]Langdon PE Yágüez L Brown J Hope A Who walks through the ‘revolving-door’ of a British psychiatry hospital? Journal of Mental Health 2001 10 5 525 33
  3. [14]Caligiuri MR Jeste DV Lacro JP Antipsychotic-Induced movement disorders in the elderly: Epidemiology and treatment recommendations Drugs Aging 2000 17 5 363 84 11190417
  4. [19]Jeste DV Alexopoulos GS Bartels SJ Cummings J Gallo JJ Gottlieb GL Halpain MC Palmer BW Patterson TL Reynolds CF Consensus statement on the upcoming crisis in geriatric mental health: Research agenda for the next two decades Arch Gen Psychiatry 1999 56 848 53 12884891
  5. [23]Gilmer T Dolder C Lacro J Folsom D Lindamer L Garcia P Jeste DV Adherence to treatment with antipsychotic medication and health care costs among medicaid beneficiaries with schizophrenia Am J Psychiatry 2004 161 4 692 9 15056516
  6. [27]Kaplan RM Anderson JP Rosser R Walker SR The Quality of Well-Being scale: Rationale for a single quality of life index Quality of Life: Assessment and Application London MTP Press 1988 51 77

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Mittal, D., Owen, R., Lacro, J., Landes, R., Edlund, M., Valenstein, M., & Jeste, D.
Affiliations
  • Central Arkansas Veterans Healthcare System (US)
  • VA San Diego Healthcare System (US)
  • University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences (US)
  • United States Department of Veterans Affairs (US)
Venue
European Psychiatry
Published
2009-01
Volume
24
Issue
S1
Pages
S1171-S1171
ISSN
  • 0924-9338 (ISSN-L)
  • 1778-3585
OpenAlex
W3024050049
Cited by
4
References
30
Citations by year
2021: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 2
FWCI
0.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • European Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of Mental Health (P30MH080002)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Family Practice › Medication Adherence and Compliance
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Schizophrenia research and treatment
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications
Keywords
antipsychotic adherence, medication adherence interventions, schizophrenia, schizoaffective disorder, older adults, veterans, psychosocial interventions, patient education, skills training, alliance building, feasibility and acceptability, telephone-delivered intervention, patient satisfaction

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review