The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The case for fruit quality: an interpretive review of consumer attitudes, and preferences for apples
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Development of a scale to measure the trait of food neophobia in humans
Pliner, P., & Hobden, K. (1992) · Appetite · doi:10.1016/0195-6663(92)90014-w · Cited by 2,137
DELIZA, R., & MacFIE, H. J. H. (1996) · Journal of Sensory Studies · doi:10.1111/j.1745-459x.1996.tb00036.x · Cited by 763
Longitudinal changes in sweet preferences in humans.
Desor, J. A., & Beauchamp, G. K. (1987) · Physiology & Behavior · doi:10.1016/0031-9384(87)90166-1 · Cited by 269
Cited by
Barrett, D. M., Beaulieu, J. C., & Shewfelt, R. (2010) · Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition · doi:10.1080/10408391003626322 · Cited by 874
Apple fruit quality: Overview on pre-harvest factors
Musacchi, S., & Serra, S. (2018) · Scientia Horticulturae · doi:10.1016/j.scienta.2017.12.057 · Cited by 527
Porat, R., Lichter, A., Terry, L. A., Harker, R., & Buzby, J. (2018) · Postharvest Biology and Technology · doi:10.1016/j.postharvbio.2017.11.019 · Cited by 420
Eating quality standards for apples based on consumer preferences
Harker, F. R., Kupferman, E. M., Marin, A. B., Gunson, F. A., & Triggs, C. M. (2008) · Postharvest Biology and Technology · doi:10.1016/j.postharvbio.2008.03.020 · Cited by 276
Self-citationEffects of the sound of the bite on apple perceived crispness and hardness
Demattè, M. L., Pojer, N., Endrizzi, I., Corollaro, M. L., Betta, E., Aprea, E., Charles, M., Biasioli, F., Zampini, M., & Gasperi, F. (2014) · Food Quality and Preference · doi:10.1016/j.foodqual.2014.05.009 · Cited by 95
Metadata
- Authors
- Harker, F. R., Gunson, F. A., & Jaeger, S. R.
- Venue
- Postharvest Biology and Technology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2003-06
- Volume
- 28
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 333-347
- ISSN
- 0925-5214 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2113457567
- Cited by
- 392
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 8.41
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The case for fruit quality: an interpretive review of consumer attitudes, and preferences for apples. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/s0925-5214(02)00215-6
- The paper
- Harker, F. R., Gunson, F. A., & Jaeger, S. R. (2003). The case for fruit quality: an interpretive review of consumer attitudes, and preferences for apples. Postharvest Biology and Technology. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0925-5214(02)00215-6
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
